OFFICIAL: Kavanaugh Hearings Thread

[jc456]

REPUBLICANS FIRE THEIR PROSECUTOR RACHEL MITCHELL AFTER SHE CORROBORATES FORD’S STORY EVEN WHILE TREATING FORD AS A HOSTILE WITNESS!!!

The RePukes hiring a female sex crime prosecutor is about as smart as Bart O'Kavanagh providing his calendar from 1982 & his collection of dried semen.

Professor ford, did you provide a copy of your doctor’s notes? I can’t remember! Yeah what a loser

 

[caddo kid]

This dude Azgog claims that Maryland can prosecute the Kavanaugh case even though they said themselves they cant. Then he provided a link that says email and texts should do away with the very same statutes Azgog claims never existed. I was like WTF?

"But Manger and McCarthy noted that prosecution was unlikely in Maryland because authorities would have to apply the law that existed at the time of the offense, not the law that exists now,"

“For example, in 1982, assault and attempted rape were both misdemeanors and subject to a one-year statute of limitations,”

Did you not watch the testimony? He can be prosecuted. I could Be wrong. I dont think I am.

You’re insane, so just accept you’re wrong and move on.

Now you know how all logical people feel when it comes to the Kavanaugh case. No proof. Just incoherent ramblings. Thank you.

some folks like Dr. Ford have cred.

some folks Like Kavanaugh have drunken rants.

Some folks that go by some bullshit internet balh blah like the Defiler have a lot of defiling to do & you have certainly defiled USMB with your bloviation of utter bullshit.

congrats; you must be in what, 3rd grade, or is it 1st?

Wasn’t she supposedly drinking at age 15? Her own admission! Now that sounds like a drunk!

The only crew is that she’s a woman

a lot of American kids were drinking at age 15 but that doesn't mean they needed to go around gang raping teenage girls like they are in the GOP, does it?

I bought my first beer when I was 13; big shit.

 

[protectionist]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

 

[Ame®icano]

REPUBLICANS FIRE THEIR PROSECUTOR RACHEL MITCHELL AFTER SHE CORROBORATES FORD’S STORY EVEN WHILE TREATING FORD AS A HOSTILE WITNESS!!!

The RePukes hiring a female sex crime prosecutor is about as smart as Bart O'Kavanagh providing his calendar from 1982 & his collection of dried semen from the attempted rape he did to Dr. Ford.

What leftists would do or say if Republicans didn't do it, and asked her questions themselves?

Mitchell did fine job by showing respect to a "victim", making her feeling comfortable, and opening many holes in her testimony.

 

[jc456]

Did you not watch the testimony? He can be prosecuted. I could Be wrong. I dont think I am.

You’re insane, so just accept you’re wrong and move on.

Now you know how all logical people feel when it comes to the Kavanaugh case. No proof. Just incoherent ramblings. Thank you.

some folks like Dr. Ford have cred.

some folks Like Kavanaugh have drunken rants.

Some folks that go by some bullshit internet balh blah like the Defiler have a lot of defiling to do & you have certainly defiled USMB with your bloviation of utter bullshit.

congrats; you must be in what, 3rd grade, or is it 1st?

Wasn’t she supposedly drinking at age 15? Her own admission! Now that sounds like a drunk!

The only crew is that she’s a woman

a lot of American kids were drinking at age 15 but that doesn't mean they needed to go around gang raping teenage girls like they are in the GOP, does it?

I bought my first beer when I was 13; big shit.

No, no, if I say so they are drunks, you can’t single out one guy!

 

[caddo kid]

REPUBLICANS FIRE THEIR PROSECUTOR RACHEL MITCHELL AFTER SHE CORROBORATES FORD’S STORY EVEN WHILE TREATING FORD AS A HOSTILE WITNESS!!!

The RePukes hiring a female sex crime prosecutor is about as smart as Bart O'Kavanagh providing his calendar from 1982 & his collection of dried semen from the attempted rape he did to Dr. Ford.

What leftists would do or say if Republicans didn't do it, and asked her questions themselves?

Mitchell did fine job by showing respect to a "victim", making her feeling comfortable, and opening many holes in her testimony.

Bart O'Kavanaugh was trying to open some holes back in 1982; yeah.

 

[Faun]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

 

[Ame®icano]

REPUBLICANS FIRE THEIR PROSECUTOR RACHEL MITCHELL AFTER SHE CORROBORATES FORD’S STORY EVEN WHILE TREATING FORD AS A HOSTILE WITNESS!!!

The RePukes hiring a female sex crime prosecutor is about as smart as Bart O'Kavanagh providing his calendar from 1982 & his collection of dried semen from the attempted rape he did to Dr. Ford.

What leftists would do or say if Republicans didn't do it, and asked her questions themselves?

Mitchell did fine job by showing respect to a "victim", making her feeling comfortable, and opening many holes in her testimony.

Bart O'Kavanaugh was trying to open some holes back in 1982; yeah.

You think someone popular as he was needed to use force to do it?

 

[eagle1462010]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

Yet they demand investigations of the allegations even though they already stated they will never vote for him anyway..........

She is accusing Kav of a crime............period.............but since it's all public opinion and not a court of law...........then we should vote already and say the hell with any further investigation.........

You got the investigation only because a few RINO's balked.

 

[Ame®icano]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

That is correct.

Leftists rejected him before he was even nominated.

The whole accusations and show was to get few more voted from the opposing side.

 

[caddo kid]

REPUBLICANS FIRE THEIR PROSECUTOR RACHEL MITCHELL AFTER SHE CORROBORATES FORD’S STORY EVEN WHILE TREATING FORD AS A HOSTILE WITNESS!!!

The RePukes hiring a female sex crime prosecutor is about as smart as Bart O'Kavanagh providing his calendar from 1982 & his collection of dried semen from the attempted rape he did to Dr. Ford.

What leftists would do or say if Republicans didn't do it, and asked her questions themselves?

Mitchell did fine job by showing respect to a "victim", making her feeling comfortable, and opening many holes in her testimony.

Bart O'Kavanaugh was trying to open some holes back in 1982; yeah.

You think someone popular as he was needed to use force to do it?

I have no idea but it sounds like Bart got really drunk & his penis got away from him

 

[Ame®icano]

REPUBLICANS FIRE THEIR PROSECUTOR RACHEL MITCHELL AFTER SHE CORROBORATES FORD’S STORY EVEN WHILE TREATING FORD AS A HOSTILE WITNESS!!!

The RePukes hiring a female sex crime prosecutor is about as smart as Bart O'Kavanagh providing his calendar from 1982 & his collection of dried semen from the attempted rape he did to Dr. Ford.

What leftists would do or say if Republicans didn't do it, and asked her questions themselves?

Mitchell did fine job by showing respect to a "victim", making her feeling comfortable, and opening many holes in her testimony.

Bart O'Kavanaugh was trying to open some holes back in 1982; yeah.

You think someone popular as he was needed to use force to do it?

I have no idea but it sounds like Bart got really drunk & his penis got away from him

According to someone who can't remember when, where, and whose witnesses don't agree with her, hearing that sounds deserve visitation to the shrink.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

To the brain-dead right, saying Hitler killed 6 million Jews means you’re a Holocaust denier.

​

This dude Azgog claims that Maryland can prosecute the Kavanaugh case even though they said themselves they cant. Then he provided a link that says email and texts should do away with the very same statutes Azgog claims never existed. I was like WTF?

"But Manger and McCarthy noted that prosecution was unlikely in Maryland because authorities would have to apply the law that existed at the time of the offense, not the law that exists now,"

“For example, in 1982, assault and attempted rape were both misdemeanors and subject to a one-year statute of limitations,”

Did you not watch the testimony? He can be prosecuted. I could Be wrong. I dont think I am.

You’re insane, so just accept you’re wrong and move on.

Now you know how all logical people feel when it comes to the Kavanaugh case. No proof. Just incoherent ramblings. Thank you.

some folks like Dr. Ford have cred.

some folks Like Kavanaugh have drunken rants.

Some folks that go by some bullshit internet balh blah like the Defiler have a lot of defiling to do & you have certainly defiled USMB with your bloviation of utter bullshit.

congrats; you must be in what, 3rd grade, or is it 1st?

Some folks like you believe in Santa Clause. Because you are a dumbass. See how erratic you’re being from an unproven accusation from me? Imagine how Kav feels as his family is torn apart by an uncorroborated accusation. You stupid Lefitst fool.

 

[Faun]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

Yet they demand investigations of the allegations even though they already stated they will never vote for him anyway..........

She is accusing Kav of a crime............period.............but since it's all public opinion and not a court of law...........then we should vote already and say the hell with any further investigation.........

You got the investigation only because a few RINO's balked.

Republicans run the Senate. They could have called for the vote at anytime. There is no burden of proof that needs to be met. Rightard media is dumbing down the right.

 

[Faun]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

That is correct.

Leftists rejected him before he was even nominated.

The whole accusations and show was to get few more voted from the opposing side.

Seems to be working.

 

[Ame®icano]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

That is correct.

Leftists rejected him before he was even nominated.

The whole accusations and show was to get few more voted from the opposing side.

Seems to be working.

Soooo, the end justify the means?

 

[eagle1462010]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

Yet they demand investigations of the allegations even though they already stated they will never vote for him anyway..........

She is accusing Kav of a crime............period.............but since it's all public opinion and not a court of law...........then we should vote already and say the hell with any further investigation.........

You got the investigation only because a few RINO's balked.

Republicans run the Senate. They could have called for the vote at anytime. There is no3 burden of proof that needs to be met. Rightard media is dumbing down the right.

3 bolted from the vote without the FBI investigation.........Flake leading the charge.....forcing the delay..........it's what it is................................

 

[Faun]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

That is correct.

Leftists rejected him before he was even nominated.

The whole accusations and show was to get few more voted from the opposing side.

Seems to be working.

Soooo, the end justify the means?

It did for Republicans, why not for Democrats?

 

[Faun]

Nope. Burden of proof is a legal bar which must be overcome in a courtroom. No Senator is bound by such legal theory when casting their vote to confirm or reject; so there is no such burden on Ford.

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

Yet they demand investigations of the allegations even though they already stated they will never vote for him anyway..........

She is accusing Kav of a crime............period.............but since it's all public opinion and not a court of law...........then we should vote already and say the hell with any further investigation.........

You got the investigation only because a few RINO's balked.

Republicans run the Senate. They could have called for the vote at anytime. There is no3 burden of proof that needs to be met. Rightard media is dumbing down the right.

3 bolted from the vote without the FBI investigation.........Flake leading the charge.....forcing the delay..........it's what it is................................

So? McConnell’s in charge. He could have called for the vote.

 

[eagle1462010]

Burden of proof is ALWAYS on the accuser, ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE, 24/7. It is a fundamental rock of our CULTURE, and way of life. Demonrats calling it as only applying to courtrooms, is just another example of their dishonest, sewer politics.

EVERYONE in America is bound by the principle of presumption of innocence. This is a standard that we live and breathe by. You are innocent, until the accuser proves you guilty. That is ANY accuser, anywhere, including Senate Demonrats and their puppet stooge, Christine B. Ford.

Amazing to see lowlifes rejecting this heart and soul concept of our nation. Maybe it's because they don't feel like they are part of this nation, but instead are open borders GLOBALISTS, who kneel during our national anthem, and are constantly talking about what THE WORLD thinks.

You’re an idiot. Burden of proof applies only in law, not in the court of public opinion.

Want proof of that? No Senator has to find Ford met a burden of proof in order to reject Kavanaugh.

Yet they demand investigations of the allegations even though they already stated they will never vote for him anyway..........

She is accusing Kav of a crime............period.............but since it's all public opinion and not a court of law...........then we should vote already and say the hell with any further investigation.........

You got the investigation only because a few RINO's balked.

Republicans run the Senate. They could have called for the vote at anytime. There is no3 burden of proof that needs to be met. Rightard media is dumbing down the right.

3 bolted from the vote without the FBI investigation.........Flake leading the charge.....forcing the delay..........it's what it is................................

So? McConnell’s in charge. He could have called for the vote.

With 3 out and not a dem breaking ranks..............what for............so you can claim a victory..........He needs those 3 votes and they vote no without the fbi................

aka.............not enough votes without them.