Oh And That BLM Violence?

[Lesh]

Really now, you were silent when your blm/antifart goons were trying to burn Portland cops alive.

That happened?

 

[westwall]

That happened?

Yeah, your goons sealed them in, then tried to burn them alive.

You should look it up.

 

[Roudy]

It’s all the evil whiteys fault.

 

[PoliticalChic]

doesn't matter what you say if all this golden goodies you are puking out here only went to the golden few, and that is exactly what happened. You have nothing but bullshit. Unless you can show somehow where anyone other then the golden few received any of the new massive wealth of this country since the trickle down lie since1981. This has nothing to do with Bush, Clinton the communist or all the rest of the nothing you are trying to throw out on the distribution of wealth since Reagan’s tax cut for the wealthy better known as the trickle down lie . That's the subject , the rest is just bullshit to camouflage you have no argument to the fact that only the golden few got any of the new wealth in this country since the trickle down lie . If you want to respond that the only subject that I'm talking about. The most common bullshit when someone has been hammered is trying to change the subject . I won't let you.

No vulgarity.....no matter how thoroughly I've destroyed your screeds.

 

[PoliticalChic]

PoliticalChic won't respond, she will just try to change the subject. I comment about Reagan and somehow these clowns thinks that something about Clinton or Obama or anything else has something to do with Reagan. These Micro minds think that somehow the actions of their hate party heroes can somehow be justified by what someone else does. They are a comedy act. that goes nowhere.​

Reagan???


The finest President in a century????


The one who ended the threat of the Democrat-endorsed Bolsheviks, without firing a shot????


That Reagan????


And this:

Reaganomics Beats Obama’s ‘Middle Class Economics’ By A Country Mile​

In the first five years of the Reagan recovery, the economy grew 4.6% a year on average. Under Obama, it’s been a paltry 2.2%.

Employment had climbed more than 18% by this point in Reagan’s recovery. Under Obama, it’s a mere 7.2%.

Looked at another way, the growth gap between Obama’s economic policies and Reagan’s is now $2.4 trillion in lost GDP and a stunning 14.4 million in lost jobs.

Obama hasn’t just underperformed Reagan, he’s underperformed every president since the Great Depression.

Consider the fact that in the past five years, real annual GDP growth hasn’t once reached 3% — which is the average growth rate, including recessions, from 1945 through 2009. If you strip out years when the economy contracted, the average growth rate is more than 4%.

Reaganomics Beats Obama's 'Middle Class Economics' By A Country Mile

Growth: President Obama has taken to touting his "middle class economics" as a big success. That's difficult to believe, given the latest GDP numbers, and impossible when you look at... Read More

www.investors.com

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

"Crooks and Liars?" Impressive big gun in the journalism world.

What does Daily Kos say about this all?

 

[jbander]

Reagan???


The finest President in a century????


The one who ended the threat of the Democrat-endorsed Bolsheviks, without firing a shot????


That Reagan????


And this:

Reaganomics Beats Obama’s ‘Middle Class Economics’ By A Country Mile​

In the first five years of the Reagan recovery, the economy grew 4.6% a year on average. Under Obama, it’s been a paltry 2.2%.

Employment had climbed more than 18% by this point in Reagan’s recovery. Under Obama, it’s a mere 7.2%.

Looked at another way, the growth gap between Obama’s economic policies and Reagan’s is now $2.4 trillion in lost GDP and a stunning 14.4 million in lost jobs.

Obama hasn’t just underperformed Reagan, he’s underperformed every president since the Great Depression.

Consider the fact that in the past five years, real annual GDP growth hasn’t once reached 3% — which is the average growth rate, including recessions, from 1945 through 2009. If you strip out years when the economy contracted, the average growth rate is more than 4%.

Reaganomics Beats Obama's 'Middle Class Economics' By A Country Mile

Growth: President Obama has taken to touting his "middle class economics" as a big success. That's difficult to believe, given the latest GDP numbers, and impossible when you look at... Read More

www.investors.com

Told you she wouldn't respond to Reagan's handing over of every drop of new wealth to the golden few at the top/

The right won't respond to this , I can come up with dozens of pieces from both Liberal and conservative media showing what a disaster Reagan was for this country as far as handing it all to him and his cronies., Add in the fact that all the weapons of mass destruction we were all worried about in Iraq were all handed over to Saddam from the piece of shit Reagan. Not only hundreds of tons of weapons of mass destruction but he sent over scientist to show them how to make all they wanted to also. The man was a piece of shit like every republican president back to Eisenhower.

 

[Lesh]

Yeah, your goons sealed them in, then tried to burn them alive.

You should look it up.

A. I don't have goons

B. Found nothing

 

[jbander]

Reagan???


The finest President in a century????


The one who ended the threat of the Democrat-endorsed Bolsheviks, without firing a shot????


That Reagan????


And this:

Reaganomics Beats Obama’s ‘Middle Class Economics’ By A Country Mile​

In the first five years of the Reagan recovery, the economy grew 4.6% a year on average. Under Obama, it’s been a paltry 2.2%.

Employment had climbed more than 18% by this point in Reagan’s recovery. Under Obama, it’s a mere 7.2%.

Looked at another way, the growth gap between Obama’s economic policies and Reagan’s is now $2.4 trillion in lost GDP and a stunning 14.4 million in lost jobs.

Obama hasn’t just underperformed Reagan, he’s underperformed every president since the Great Depression.

Consider the fact that in the past five years, real annual GDP growth hasn’t once reached 3% — which is the average growth rate, including recessions, from 1945 through 2009. If you strip out years when the economy contracted, the average growth rate is more than 4%.

Reaganomics Beats Obama's 'Middle Class Economics' By A Country Mile

Growth: President Obama has taken to touting his "middle class economics" as a big success. That's difficult to believe, given the latest GDP numbers, and impossible when you look at... Read More

www.investors.com

No one is arguing about how well the economy did , that's not even the point , THE POINT AND THE ONLY THING THAT COUNTS WAS EVERY DIME OF THAT NEW WEALTH WENT TO THE SMALLEST BLOCK OF PEOPLE < as in REAGAN AND HIS BUDDY"S ---you are are loser just like all right wingers. .You live in the world of bullshit. Like all the rest of you hate party members.

 

[jknowgood]

Right-Wing Militia Plotted 2020 Cop Attacks To Pin On Left

A violent right-wing extremist group called The Grizzly Scouts plotted to attack law enforcement officers last summer, intending to blame the left. Magistrates have freed most of them on bond, saying they're not a threat to the community.

crooksandliars.com

Turns out some of the most violent and deadly was perpetrated by WHITE Supremacists. Including cop killers

So it took you loons over a year to come up with someone to blame? You're losing your touch. Lol

 

[jknowgood]

A. I don't have goons

B. Found nothing

No actually your boys did.

 

[jbander]

Who are the gainers of tax rates in this country.
This says it all

 

[westwall]

A. I don't have goons

B. Found nothing

Then you didn't look

 

[Lesh]

Then you didn't look

I did. But hey. Post a link

 

[PoliticalChic]

Told you she wouldn't respond to Reagan's handing over of every drop of new wealth to the golden few at the top/ View attachment 548528
The right won't respond to this , I can come up with dozens of pieces from both Liberal and conservative media showing what a disaster Reagan was for this country as far as handing it all to him and his cronies., Add in the fact that all the weapons of mass destruction we were all worried about in Iraq were all handed over to Saddam from the piece of shit Reagan. Not only hundreds of tons of weapons of mass destruction but he sent over scientist to show them how to make all they wanted to also. The man was a piece of shit like every republican president back to Eisenhower.

You poor little government school simpleton......

Compare this with the Reagan recovery:

"During this seven-year recovery, the economy grew by almost one-third, the equivalent of adding the entire economy of West Germany, the third-largest in the world at the time, to the U.S. economy. In 1984 alone real economic growth boomed by 6.8%, the highest in 50 years. Nearly 20 million new jobs were created during the recovery, increasing U.S. civilian employment by almost 20%. Unemployment fell to 5.3% by 1989.



Real per-capita disposable income increased by 18% from 1982 to 1989, meaning the American standard of living increased by almost 20% in just seven years. The poverty rate declined every year from 1984 to 1989, dropping by one-sixth from its peak. The stock market more than tripled in value from 1980 to 1990, a larger increase than in any previous decade."

Reaganomics Vs. Obamanomics: Facts And Figures

By every statistical measure the Reagan recovery outshines Obama's.

www.forbes.com

Why do you suppose Reagan won in a landslide?

Why do you suppose your Democrat masters hate and fear him?



You probably still believe Clinton ever produced a surplus.

 

[Meathead]

Right-Wing Militia Plotted 2020 Cop Attacks To Pin On Left

A violent right-wing extremist group called The Grizzly Scouts plotted to attack law enforcement officers last summer, intending to blame the left. Magistrates have freed most of them on bond, saying they're not a threat to the community.

crooksandliars.com

Turns out some of the most violent and deadly was perpetrated by WHITE Supremacists. Including cop killers

BLM's was mostly peaceful violence. I saw it on CNN.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Who are the gainers of tax rates in this country.
This says it all
View attachment 548531

Pictures are your chosen entertainment, it seems.....

Let's see if words have any effect:

Here, in America, there is no perennial class of 'the rich.'

"...economic mobility. About 60 percent of the households that were in the lowest income quintile in 1999 were in a higher quintile ten years later. During the same decade, almost 40 percent of the richest households fell to a lower quintile. This is a nation where you can rise or fall. It is a nation where you can climb the economic ladder based not on who you are born to, or what class you are born into, but based on your talents, your passion, your perseverance, and the content of your character." https://imprimisarchives.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_05_Imprimis.pdf




See if this hurts:


There is no perpetual 'Elite Wealthy Class' in America.

There is no 'Rich Class.'

The hypostetical construct is a useful image ginned up by the Left.
You seem to have fallen for it.

"Intellectuals often make the mistake of basing political analysis on clichés that misrepresent reality. Sowell shows, for instance, how debates about income distribution in the United States have been distorted by a preoccupation with statistical categories.

a. Journalists and academics alike endlessly repeat that the rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer. What these discussions ignore is that people move with some frequency from category to category over time. Only 5 percent of Americans who were in the bottom quintile of income earners in 1975 were still there in 1991. Only 25 percent of the super-rich in 1996 (the top 1/100th of 1 percent of income earners) remained in that category in 2005.

b. Over half of the poor earning at or near the minimum wage are between the ages of 16 and 24. As Sowell wryly notes, these individuals cannot remain from 16 to 24 years of age indefinitely, though that age category can of course continue indefinitely, providing many intellectuals with data to fit their preconceptions.

c. Abstract talk about inequities in income distribution presupposes a social problem, where strictly speaking one may not exist at all. Sowells analysis helps us understand why intellectuals so often call for government to promote economic redistribution."
An Independent Mind by Daniel J. Mahoney, City Journal 18 June 2010




Clearly you are the result of public school indoctrination, and appear unable to shake off the lies.
So sad.
If Americans do not wrest the schools back from the Democrats/Liberals the way earlier Republicans pried their slave away from them, this nation is doomed.

 

[westwall]

Pictures are your chosen entertainment, it seems.....

Let's see if words have any effect:

Here, in America, there is no perennial class of 'the rich.'

"...economic mobility. About 60 percent of the households that were in the lowest income quintile in 1999 were in a higher quintile ten years later. During the same decade, almost 40 percent of the richest households fell to a lower quintile. This is a nation where you can rise or fall. It is a nation where you can climb the economic ladder based not on who you are born to, or what class you are born into, but based on your talents, your passion, your perseverance, and the content of your character." https://imprimisarchives.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_05_Imprimis.pdf




See if this hurts:


There is no perpetual 'Elite Wealthy Class' in America.

There is no 'Rich Class.'

The hypostetical construct is a useful image ginned up by the Left.
You seem to have fallen for it.

"Intellectuals often make the mistake of basing political analysis on clichés that misrepresent reality. Sowell shows, for instance, how debates about income distribution in the United States have been distorted by a preoccupation with statistical categories.

a. Journalists and academics alike endlessly repeat that the rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer. What these discussions ignore is that people move with some frequency from category to category over time. Only 5 percent of Americans who were in the bottom quintile of income earners in 1975 were still there in 1991. Only 25 percent of the super-rich in 1996 (the top 1/100th of 1 percent of income earners) remained in that category in 2005.

b. Over half of the poor earning at or near the minimum wage are between the ages of 16 and 24. As Sowell wryly notes, these individuals cannot remain from 16 to 24 years of age indefinitely, though that age category can of course continue indefinitely, providing many intellectuals with data to fit their preconceptions.

c. Abstract talk about inequities in income distribution presupposes a social problem, where strictly speaking one may not exist at all. Sowells analysis helps us understand why intellectuals so often call for government to promote economic redistribution."
An Independent Mind by Daniel J. Mahoney, City Journal 18 June 2010




Clearly you are the result of public school indoctrination, and appear unable to shake off the lies.
So sad.
If Americans do not wrest the schools back from the Democrats/Liberals the way earlier Republicans pried their slave away from them, this nation is doomed.

There used to be no rich class. The political class has been working for decades to subvert the COTUS so that they can set themselves up to be our perpetual masters.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There used to be no rich class. The political class has been working for decades to subvert the COTUS so that they can set themselves up to be our perpetual masters.

While my basic statement remains the fact...it's hard to argue with the point you are making.


Did you see this?

"Democrats hiding $50,000/year journalist tax credit in “infrastructure” bill​

House Democrats are seeking to reward the mainstream media for their assistance over the past several years by including a $50,000 per year tax break hidden deep inside the ridiculously named $3.5 trillion “infrastructure” plan, the Washington Times reports.


Republicans slammed the proposal, saying that it is basically a giveaway to the “mainstream news media,” which strongly favors Democrats and takes great pleasure in excoriating Republicans.

“Freedom of the press does not contemplate government funding of it,” Johnson said. "

Revealed: Democrats hiding $50,000/year journalist tax credit in "infrastructure" bill​

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) slammed inclusion of the tax credit buried deep in the $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill, claiming the relationship could be exploited for propaganda purposes, called it a "dangerous precedent"

www.lawenforcementtoday.com





Pretty much the sort of association we call Fascism.

 

[westwall]

While my basic statement remains the fact...it's hard to argue with the point you are making.


Did you see this?

"Democrats hiding $50,000/year journalist tax credit in “infrastructure” bill​

House Democrats are seeking to reward the mainstream media for their assistance over the past several years by including a $50,000 per year tax break hidden deep inside the ridiculously named $3.5 trillion “infrastructure” plan, the Washington Times reports.


Republicans slammed the proposal, saying that it is basically a giveaway to the “mainstream news media,” which strongly favors Democrats and takes great pleasure in excoriating Republicans.

“Freedom of the press does not contemplate government funding of it,” Johnson said. "

Revealed: Democrats hiding $50,000/year journalist tax credit in "infrastructure" bill​

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) slammed inclusion of the tax credit buried deep in the $3.5 trillion infrastructure bill, claiming the relationship could be exploited for propaganda purposes, called it a "dangerous precedent"

www.lawenforcementtoday.com





Pretty much the sort of association we call Fascism.

Yup. The next few years are going to interesting.....but veeeery dangerous.

Quite literally the Right to be free is in question.