Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the decision of the radical liberal court. There is no other conclusion. The SCOTUS says back alley abortions with coat hangers is scantioned by the Constitution of the United States. If that is law, then why do we need to have abortions made legal in law. Anybody can perform abortions, I'm thinking about hanging up a shingle and compete with PP for the abortions market. Not much overhead. A coat hanger and a bottle of alchohol. Maybe.No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations
Liar. The Texas law was clear. Liberals want coat hanger abortions.No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations
LOL- and by all of that- you mean the same level of regulation required for a colonoscopy? Or for child birth- both more dangerous than a legal abortion?
Why did Texas pass a law requiring far more stringent requirements for an abortion than for a colonoscopy- even though colonoscopies have 10 times the mortality rate of abortions?
Because this law was always about shutting down abortion clinics- and never was about women's health.
Texas is going to tell them to screw themselves.
Yep, and Gruber proved your dumb enough to believe everything Obama tells you.I would believe Texas before I would believe Obama or Hillary.I'm not as stupid to think making abortion clinics safer is a bad thing.A doctor doesn't have admitting privileges. So yes they won't be admitted as quickly if they did. Just ask joan river's daughter.
Don't expect you to answer, but I'll ask anyway:
Are you really this fuckin' stupid or are you just saying this to troll?
You are stupid enough to believe what Texas is telling you.
Of course you would believe anything Texas tells you.
My back alley abortion business will undercut your PP clinics.it means that women don't have to seek back alley abortions but can go to safe clinics in their area.
But if those regulations saved just one life. It would be worth it, right?Okay, I go with your reasoning. If there is a complication. There is no reason to do more. Then maybe you can save a life. Just let them die, so abortions will be super easy to get. Got it, dumbass.Okay you keep thinking that, but there is a reason it should done.
Which, in your ignorance, you cannot articulate with any greater specifics than "Uh.....cuz."
Is there a large record of cases of complication that couldn't be dealt with in places that don't have the requirements that Texas attempted to impose?
Texas was trying to unduly burden the exercise of a constitutional right and, oops, they got caught at it and spanked.
Liar. The Texas law was clear. Liberals want coat hanger abortions.No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations
LOL- and by all of that- you mean the same level of regulation required for a colonoscopy? Or for child birth- both more dangerous than a legal abortion?
Why did Texas pass a law requiring far more stringent requirements for an abortion than for a colonoscopy- even though colonoscopies have 10 times the mortality rate of abortions?
Because this law was always about shutting down abortion clinics- and never was about women's health.
My back alley abortion business will undercut your PP clinics.it means that women don't have to seek back alley abortions but can go to safe clinics in their area.
Libtards ignore this point 100% of the time.What..you haven't seceded yet? Leave already.Texas is going to tell them to screw themselves.
Texas still abides by the constitution. The people who want federally funded murder and who object to the constitution should be the ones who leave.
Or who are put away.
a woman's choice is not unconstitutional. Part of her life liberty and happiness.
a fetus is not a person till it is viable enough to survive outside the womb.
if a fetus had a right to life then even birth control, including the rhythm method, would be criminal.
many infants die within the first year from natural causes.
Many women miscarriage
Not for you to decide.
Only the woman can decide what is right for her.
worry about the millions of children that need good homes instead of trying to control a woman's freedom of choice
If a human fetus is not a person, why then doesn't the SCOTUS use that fact(sic) to overturn the Federal and (now more than 35) States "Fetal Homicide" laws which make it a crime of "murder" to kill a "child in the womb" in "ANY stage of development" during a criminal act?
Murder, by definition, is the criminal killing of one PERSON by another. Isn't it?
This is the decision of the radical liberal court. There is no other conclusion. The SCOTUS says back alley abortions with coat hangers is scantioned by the Constitution of the United States. If that is law, then why do we need to have abortions made legal in law. Anybody can perform abortions, I'm thinking about hanging up a shingle and compete with PP for the abortions market. Not much overhead. A coat hanger and a bottle of alchohol. Maybe.No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations
. Thanks. You've given me an idea for an additional income source.It means that women can have an abortion in someone's garage. performed by a person that learned how by watching you tube.
"Clinics" don't have to have the same standards of hospitals. That all I need to know. Coat hangers are medical instruments.Since you don't have the reading comprehension to understand what the Court ruled, it may be your only employment option.
What..you haven't seceded yet? Leave already.Texas is going to tell them to screw themselves.
Texas still abides by the constitution. The people who want federally funded murder and who object to the constitution should be the ones who leave.
Or who are put away.
a woman's choice is not unconstitutional. Part of her life liberty and happiness.
a fetus is not a person till it is viable enough to survive outside the womb.
if a fetus had a right to life then even birth control, including the rhythm method, would be criminal.
many infants die within the first year from natural causes.
Many women miscarriage
Not for you to decide.
Only the woman can decide what is right for her.
worry about the millions of children that need good homes instead of trying to control a woman's freedom of choice
If a human fetus is not a person, why then doesn't the SCOTUS use that fact(sic) to overturn the Federal and (now more than 35) States "Fetal Homicide" laws which make it a crime of "murder" to kill a "child in the womb" in "ANY stage of development" during a criminal act?
Murder, by definition, is the criminal killing of one PERSON by another. Isn't it?
Just try to sue a back alley abortionist. You'll have no standing.No need for regulations, no need for any sorts of restrictions, laws, basic oversight..and while we're at it, there's no need to let the women know what is being done to them in any detail, no need for education about the procedures, no need for any degree of professionalism that is required even in a VETERINARIAN'S OFFICE.
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations
Yes, that exactly what they said isn't it.
Yup.
"Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said the law "was an effort to improve minimum safety standards and ensure capable care for Texas women. It's exceedingly unfortunate that the court has taken the ability to protect women's health out of the hands of Texas citizens and their duly elected representatives."
Supreme Court strikes down Texas abortion clinic regulations
Ken Paxton is full of shit. There was only one purpose for these regulations.
Yes, to protect women.
Bullshit, and that's why the SC shut you fucks down. Deal widdit.
. Thanks. You've given me an idea for an additional income source.It means that women can have an abortion in someone's garage. performed by a person that learned how by watching you tube.
But if those regulations saved just one life. It would be worth it, right?
Licensed by whom?. Thanks. You've given me an idea for an additional income source.It means that women can have an abortion in someone's garage. performed by a person that learned how by watching you tube.
still have to be trained and licensed so no you can't just watch youtube
Especially abortion where 1/2 of the parties ends up dead and the other half is happy and in love with substandard care! I got it. Liberals are weird.Why are you concerned with birthing rooms. There won't be a birth, there will be an abortion.You would have a c section in a birthing room? My god.clinics have to be inspected a few times a year. these are licensed facilities for out patients.
They can preform vaginal exams, cancer test, biopsies and D&C but it must meet higher standards for an abortion?
C-sections can be done in birthing rooms and don't require a surgical theater.
Even a vasectomy does not require a surgical facility.
If there is a high risk a birth might be advised to a hospital. if there is a choice, the woman's life and needs comes first, always.
Many birthing rooms now do so. Many maturity wards also have pools and birthing chairs for childbirth as well. Midwives that do home births are able to do c-sections if paramedics can not respond in time. Not that major a procedure. Don't even need to be sedated. It is not brain surgery, you can be talked through it by 911 if need be.
the merits of over regulation for put patient procedures.
Surgical theaters are not necessary for all things.
