Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 72,956
- 68,792
Why was he arrested for words?....I didn't think that was allowed in a free nation....he didn't shout fire in a crowded room...so what gives?....but we see people burn and loot to their hearts content and get out of jail with a slap on the wrist....so what are you talking about?...What the fuck are you talking about??NO...they should not face any charges...the man was breaking the law and he resisted arrest...case closed....we must reinstall law enforcement authority or this will keep on happening....I wouldn't think of resisting a cop in any way...never have and never will I don't care how wrong they are....I will retract revenge in court in necessary but I will never disobey an order from a cop...would you?....Big tech didn't arrest him...the police did...At least its legal today...free speech is not...apparently....just ask big tech....But would looting a store hurt the darkie in the way he wanted??He should have burned and looted a store instead....that's legal today...free speech is not....
I mean he was really upset at the fact that darkies exist....don't know if looting a store would help that out....
Maybe he can start an organization that is devoted to doing something about the existence of darkies....but I doubt any such group like that is even possible....what would they even call it?
But you didn't mention them...why is this?
Don't you agree the police should face charges for what they did to this man??
I said the guy whom you claim had his "free speech" violated by big tech wasn't arrested by big tech, he was arrested by the police...
Why aren't you addressing your anger with the ACTUAL GOVERNMENT AGENCY that arrested him?