Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Certainly stronger than they are today. Even slave families. Look at it this way. The families of slaves could be ripped apart at any moment. Fathers taken from children, children taken from families and sold to strangers. How awful. Can anyone contemplate a worse way of living?Okay- with that I am out of discussing Roy Moore's possible sex abuse of a 14 year old girl.
I will discuss Moore's bizarre claim that America's families were strongest- when America owned slaves.
Compared with today. Black men walking out on their women. They don't know who their children are. Women have no idea who impregnated them, they rely on the Slave master, excuse me, the government to feed and clothe them.
At least when these unfortunate people were unfortunate slaves, they wanted their family. Which automatically gives them a stronger family value than they have today.
It's still not an admission of collusion dumbass.
Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
You were asking that question to a "star". That's the only way to sign "scads" of books and programs. They were autographs, obviously.It's still not an admission of collusion dumbass.
Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
You were asking that question to a "star". That's the only way to sign "scads" of books and programs. They were autographs, obviously.Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
Signing autographs - the work of "stars".
You mean like Flynn's admission gives credence to the widely held belief that the Trump administration colluded with Russia?
No, what did Flynn admit to? Did he admit to colluding? Learn something for once.
clearly you're too stupid to understand what a plea deal is.
just wait till he testifies to his proffer.
It's still not an admission of collusion dumbass.
Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
I certainly can't- its suspicious as hell.No one can answer this simple question: Why won't Allred allow the yearbook to be examined?
Of course no one can answer why Trump won't allow his income taxes be examined either.
And that is suspicious as hell.
The InternetDid that happen? Yes. Was it commonplace? No.
The Old South plantation idea of slavery depicted in popular books and movies did not generally exist in the South. Most slave owners had few slaves and those slaves worked in the fields or in the homes alongside their owners. Mistreating them made no sense to the owners.
Who exactly was doing all of that to the slaves while the men had gone off to fight in the War or the Northern Aggression?
Sorry Tory .. but it was indeed commonplace. Northern aggression? LoL
Slave Punishments
Slaves Were Often Tortured to Death! Examples…
Edjumucate thyself
Stupidity run amuck!
How about a source not written by some obvious whack job?
Remember "Uncle Tom's Cabin"? It was in reality a work of fiction. The author had never ventured south of northern Kentucky. So what did she base her extensive writing on?
Because it gives credence to the widely held belief that it’s all a scam by the democrats.
You mean like Flynn's admission gives credence to the widely held belief that the Trump administration colluded with Russia?
No, what did Flynn admit to? Did he admit to colluding? Learn something for once.
Flynn pled guilty to lying to the FBI. And Flynn is actually connected to the Trump Administration- he was part of it.
If you want to pretend that this one woman- completely unrelated to any of the other women- somehow taints the rest of them- then Flynn's confession by that standard- clearly taints the honesty of the Trump candidate.
We were talking about collusion. Flynn admitting to lying to the FBI. There's no connection from that to collusion. It doesn't exist. Flynn's admission is irrelevant.
And you were talking about collusion between the women against Moore. The one woman hasn't even admitted to lying- and there is no connection from that to any of the women. This one woman's admission is irrelevant to the other woman's accusations.
Well it would be if you were consistent and not a hypocrite.
Do I really think that Flynn's confession of lying taints the entire Administration- not by itself. But I also don't think that this one woman writing the date and place where Moore signed the yearbook taints the rest of the accusations.
Because I am consistent- and not hypocritical.
clearly you're too stupid to understand what a plea deal is.
just wait till he testifies to his proffer.
It's still not an admission of collusion dumbass.
Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
As for the other eight- they have their first hand accounts. You don't have to believe any of them if you don't want to. But there are still 9 first hand accusations by women willing to identify themselves.
I am hoping Moore sues them all. How about you?
Get Moore and these women up on the stand to testify with the threat of perjury.
You were asking that question to a "star". That's the only way to sign "scads" of books and programs. They were autographs, obviously.Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
Signing autographs - the work of "stars".
Still trying to get this thread back to the topic- Moore's bizarre opinion that America was at its best with families when there was slavery in America.
Actually, that is what he saidYou were asking that question to a "star". That's the only way to sign "scads" of books and programs. They were autographs, obviously.You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
Signing autographs - the work of "stars".
Still trying to get this thread back to the topic- Moore's bizarre opinion that America was at its best with families when there was slavery in America.
That’s not what he said at all. It’s a lie.
The InternetDid that happen? Yes. Was it commonplace? No.
The Old South plantation idea of slavery depicted in popular books and movies did not generally exist in the South. Most slave owners had few slaves and those slaves worked in the fields or in the homes alongside their owners. Mistreating them made no sense to the owners.
Who exactly was doing all of that to the slaves while the men had gone off to fight in the War or the Northern Aggression?
Sorry Tory .. but it was indeed commonplace. Northern aggression? LoL
Slave Punishments
Slaves Were Often Tortured to Death! Examples…
Edjumucate thyself
Stupidity run amuck!
How about a source not written by some obvious whack job?
Remember "Uncle Tom's Cabin"? It was in reality a work of fiction. The author had never ventured south of northern Kentucky. So what did she base her extensive writing on?
It's still not an admission of collusion dumbass.
Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
One would have to look at why Moore was signing yearbooks. He certainly wasn't a student. For example, as a guest dignitary, I suspect he signed several.
So now the story is that he did sign it?Nor is the one woman's admission that one part of the yearbook was written by her- an admission of forgery- nor of course is it an admission of collusion with the other 8 women.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
One would have to look at why Moore was signing yearbooks. He certainly wasn't a student. For example, as a guest dignitary, I suspect he signed several.
Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
One would have to look at why Moore was signing yearbooks. He certainly wasn't a student. For example, as a guest dignitary, I suspect he signed several.
A guest dignitary? Holy fuck how did you come up with that? Or was that in the GOP email talking points for the day?
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
One would have to look at why Moore was signing yearbooks. He certainly wasn't a student. For example, as a guest dignitary, I suspect he signed several.
A guest dignitary? Holy fuck how did you come up with that? Or was that in the GOP email talking points for the day?
Why was he signing yearbooks?
So now the story is that he did sign it?Well, since Allred won't release the yearbook to an independent source for analysis, one can easily assume that Moore signed the yearbook, and the accuser wrote the rest.
As for the other eight, they have no more proof than the first.
You do realize that if Moore did sign the yearbook- that means he knew her well enough to sign her yearbook- which establishes a connection- and would mean that Moore is lying.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
One would have to look at why Moore was signing yearbooks. He certainly wasn't a student. For example, as a guest dignitary, I suspect he signed several.
Shrug. I've signed books and programs for scads of people I don't know. It means nothing.
How many high school yearbooks have you signed for someone you don't know?
One would have to look at why Moore was signing yearbooks. He certainly wasn't a student. For example, as a guest dignitary, I suspect he signed several.
A guest dignitary? Holy fuck how did you come up with that? Or was that in the GOP email talking points for the day?
Why was he signing yearbooks?
Because he was a 32 year old perv that was trying to get into the pants of the 14-16 year olds.
