Oregon Bakers: You get to pay 135,000 for being radical religious morons, Judge so orders!

Bodee is a moron if she buys what she said about the Sodom and Gommarah story. God destroyed those cities because of their filthy Faggotry and degeneracy plain as day, according to scripture.
 
If Government wants to dictate how a certain business is to be run, what goods and services it must offer, and to whom, then let government buy that business from its private owners, giving them just compensation for it. Until government does that, yes, that business is private property, subject to the will and rights of its private owners, and those parameters of how it is to be run are none of government's damn business.

Not really.

Businesses have to comply with all commerce laws. That means Mr. Wifebeater has to clean the pots and pans before he cooks something because hey, they have those oppressive sanitation laws.
 
And the owners chose to stay at the bakery and accept the consequences of breaking the law.

Why are there no consequences for the corrupt public officials who knowingly and willfully conspired with a pair of disgusting, immoral sex perverts to violate the Constitution, in order to deny these bakers their rights which are explicitly affirmed in the First Amendment?
So, you want Oregon officials punished for applying the law equally and not discriminating against a totally law-abiding, tax-paying gay couple. This is what we would look forward to in America if so-called RW christians had their way with their christian sharia? I guess so.
 
Bodee is a moron if she buys what she said about the Sodom and Gommarah story. God destroyed those cities because of their filthy Faggotry and degeneracy plain as day, according to scripture.

Okay, let's look at that.

The only reference to gay stuff is that the men of Sodom asked that the stranger be sent out so that they would "know" them (yadda in Hebrew). While yadda is used to imply sex in other parts of the bible, this is the only place where it is used to imply gay sex.

Meanwhile, Lot, the righteous guy that God JUST HAD TO SAVE!!! He offered his daughters up to the mob for gang rape.

He then went on to have drunken sex with his daughter after the city was destroyed.

This is the righteous guy GOD JUST HAD TO SAVE!!!
 
That's a good idea but as they are going to pursue this further, their legal costs go up. Win. lose or draw, this is going to cost them.

They are represented for free by a Christian Legal Advocacy Group so they don't have legal costs. If they win the case the group can petition a judgement against Oregon to pay reasonable attorney's fees.


>>>>
 
Bodee is a moron if she buys what she said about the Sodom and Gommarah story. God destroyed those cities because of their filthy Faggotry and degeneracy plain as day, according to scripture.

Okay, let's look at that.

The only reference to gay stuff is that the men of Sodom asked that the stranger be sent out so that they would "know" them (yadda in Hebrew). While yadda is used to imply sex in other parts of the bible, this is the only place where it is used to imply gay sex.

Meanwhile, Lot, the righteous guy that God JUST HAD TO SAVE!!! He offered his daughters up to the mob for gang rape.

He then went on to have drunken sex with his daughter after the city was destroyed.

This is the righteous guy GOD JUST HAD TO SAVE!!!
You forgot the part about the men rejecting the daughters and wanting the man.
 
The government grants business licenses. That would be their call.

But since we're speculating, let's say the dykes want to pave their driveway. They go to buy gravel and want a special gay gravel. Should the gravel guy be forced to produce this gay gravel for them? He doesn't sell gay gravel to anybody. He doesn't sell gay gravel at all. Force him to?

Please define the difference between "straight" gravel and "gay" gravel.


>>>>
 
The Dumb Democrat Bigots are against Freedom of Religion.

Keep it in your home, where you can be as mentally sick as you want to be, as you offer your kids to priest for fake lord love.
A home is private property
a bakery is also private property

therefore, you proved your support for the gay couple to be wrong.

congratulations.
That's cool....no business licenses no safety laws no health laws to follow now...all one has to do is state it's against their so-called religion.

This isn't a religious issue. It's far more fundamental. Unless they've signed a contract to the contrary, everyone, always, has the right to say "no".
 
The dykes demanded something he didn't offer for sale.


Yes they did offer Wedding Cakes, the bakers have agreed to this in court documents.

The problem was with who was purchasing the product not any difference in the recipe or production process.


>>>>
 
Bodee is a moron if she buys what she said about the Sodom and Gommarah story. God destroyed those cities because of their filthy Faggotry and degeneracy plain as day, according to scripture.

Okay, let's look at that.

The only reference to gay stuff is that the men of Sodom asked that the stranger be sent out so that they would "know" them (yadda in Hebrew). While yadda is used to imply sex in other parts of the bible, this is the only place where it is used to imply gay sex.

Meanwhile, Lot, the righteous guy that God JUST HAD TO SAVE!!! He offered his daughters up to the mob for gang rape.

He then went on to have drunken sex with his daughter after the city was destroyed.

This is the righteous guy GOD JUST HAD TO SAVE!!!
You're a moron. "Know" means sex period in the biblical sense. The fags wanted to fuck the angels. Sodom and Gommorah isn't even the only story. God ordered the homes of faggots to be destroyed because they were too close to His temple. You're a dipshit and have no leg to stand on.
 
They are represented for free by a Christian Legal Advocacy Group so they don't have legal costs. If they win the case the group can petition a judgement against Oregon to pay reasonable attorney's fees.>>>>
`
`

It's still going to cost, no matter who pays for it. If they lose, they can be sued for lawyers fees. However, first things first. I'll wait until the plaintiff actually files in court. That, in itself, should be interesting.
 
The government grants business licenses. That would be their call.

But since we're speculating, let's say the dykes want to pave their driveway. They go to buy gravel and want a special gay gravel. Should the gravel guy be forced to produce this gay gravel for them? He doesn't sell gay gravel to anybody. He doesn't sell gay gravel at all. Force him to?

Please define the difference between "straight" gravel and "gay" gravel.


>>>>
A special gravel the gravel man does not offer.

Here's the question all avoid: Should he be forced to sell something he doesn't want to, ie, do protective rights apply to products.
 

Forum List

Back
Top