Oregon Bakers: You get to pay 135,000 for being radical religious morons, Judge so orders!

[Aba Incieni]

Where in the constitution does it say one has to provide goods and services? There is a supreme court precedent regarding anti-discrimination, based on xyz, yet no direct verbiage in the constitution. So maybe its the courts that need to interpret law not write and create law.
Ore-gone, nothing more needs to be said.

One has to ask themselves why didn't they just find another baker? or is it they wanted to ram their lifestyle down the throats of people they knew in advance help strong religious beliefs?

The couple could have went elsewhere, but they wanted to make a spectacle of the situation, and they wanted to ruin the Kleins.
So much could have been avoided here if the couple would have simply honored the Klein's religious beliefs and gone elsewhere. Instead, taxpayers have been out money with the court cases, a family has been financially ruined, and there's been a lot of hate spewed back and forth.

The bakery could have just baked the cake, but they wanted to make a spectacle of the situation, and they wanted to insult the couple buying the cake. So much could have been avoided here if the bakery would have simply honored the couples wishes and baked the cake. Instead, taxpayers have been out money with the court cases, a family has been financially ruined, and there's been a lot of hate spewed back and forth. Luckily, it was the ones who caused the problem that were ruined, so they kinda deserved it.

Well, the fat lady ain't sung yet.

Perhaps not, but she just got $135,000 for showing up.

No she didn't. The couple were ordered to pay and they will now appeal to a higher court.

 

[Baz Ares]

'In a pertinent twist one of the owners of Sweet Cakes bakery became very ill and as there was only one doctor within 100 miles they went to him. Unfortunately the doctor refused to help the poor soul because it was against his religion to treat her and his freedom of religion protects his right to discriminate against people in his business as he sees fit. The couple hurriedly got in their car to speed to the next large city where they could find a hospital but having stopped for gasoline found the owner of the gas station refused to sell them gasoline based on his religion. The harried couple then called a cab driver who showed up wearing a turban and the husband could be heard saying to his wife, "oh shit we're screwed. Let us pray". They prayed hard and the wife died at the side of the road.' - This has been theater of the mind. No persons were hurt during it's creation or telling. -

Thankfully the religion of each of these people was not infringed.

Indeed. However their cheerleaders on here would think it a price worth paying.

They offer their kids freely to be raped by godly appointed PRIEST STILL TODAY!
They still protect their priest from man's many laws around these issues. The offering of
their kids and others are the deposable price, and godly not too much a price to pay
for their lordy godly love needs.

 

[BULLDOG]

Where in the constitution does it say one has to provide goods and services? There is a supreme court precedent regarding anti-discrimination, based on xyz, yet no direct verbiage in the constitution. So maybe its the courts that need to interpret law not write and create law.
Ore-gone, nothing more needs to be said.

One has to ask themselves why didn't they just find another baker? or is it they wanted to ram their lifestyle down the throats of people they knew in advance help strong religious beliefs?

The couple could have went elsewhere, but they wanted to make a spectacle of the situation, and they wanted to ruin the Kleins.
So much could have been avoided here if the couple would have simply honored the Klein's religious beliefs and gone elsewhere. Instead, taxpayers have been out money with the court cases, a family has been financially ruined, and there's been a lot of hate spewed back and forth.

The bakery could have just baked the cake, but they wanted to make a spectacle of the situation, and they wanted to insult the couple buying the cake. So much could have been avoided here if the bakery would have simply honored the couples wishes and baked the cake. Instead, taxpayers have been out money with the court cases, a family has been financially ruined, and there's been a lot of hate spewed back and forth. Luckily, it was the ones who caused the problem that were ruined, so they kinda deserved it.

Yes, a lot could have been avoided had they baked the fucking cake.
They should have known the LGBT bully gestapo would work to ruin them instead of taking the high road and gone elsewhere.

Yes. How dare those mean LGBT bullies demand the law be followed. They should know religious nuts are exempt from any laws.

 

[toobfreak]

Court rules against Oregon bakers who refused to make gay wedding cake
The Oregon Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld a $135,000 fine against two Christian bakers who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

The case began back in January 2013, when Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of the since-closed Sweet Cakes by Melissa bakery just outside Portland, Oregon, cited their religious beliefs when declining to make a wedding cake for Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer.

Following the incident, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries found the Kleins in violation of a 2007 state law that protects the rights of LGBTQ people in employment, housing and public accommodations. In 2015, the couple was ordered to pay the Bowman-Cryers emotional distress damages.
Court rules against Oregon bakers who refused to make gay wedding cake

Happy New Years too, THESE LOSER MENTAL ANAL RELIGIOUS BOY RAPE SUPPORTER BAKER MORONS. As you will always bake cakes for raper priest klans roaming our streets. Following fake gods, does suck folks, as shown here by these losers. And costly as well. For what in the end? Just to show others
who are the sickest mental thinkers, walking the planet are.

Melissa and Aaron Klein have been ordered to pay $135,000 to a lesbian couple the bakers declined to make a cake for. (Courtesy Sweet Cakes by Melissa)
“Support Sweet Cakes by Melissa”, which raised over $100,000 before it was shut down by GoFundMe, who stated that the campaign was not compatible with their terms of service.

WOW? The cake would have made them a few bucks. But they wanted to give them a 135K Cash wedding gift..LOL!

BTW: Really, these folks still follow gods after the church paid out 600-1.3 billion in damages for raping kids. WTF is with that? Preist ASSAULT on children (rape) okay
and still follows fake lords. but if, two adults, legal ones, and their personal sexual relationship is not to be allowed, and protested by mentally sick bakers. WTF is with THAT?

I think the smarter thing to do would have been just to make the cake for the stupid Queers and put a little "surprise" in the frosting for them since they are too uppity simply to walk down the street and take their business to the next place!

 

[Baz Ares]

Yeah, like some ass wipe is gonna die if a cake is not baked. You lefties are freaking morons!

RAW Eggs carries the salmonella deadly virus. Does that count?

 

[BULLDOG]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Tell that to a Muslim bakery.

Make up your mind. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

 

[Aba Incieni]

Court rules against Oregon bakers who refused to make gay wedding cake
The Oregon Court of Appeals on Thursday upheld a $135,000 fine against two Christian bakers who refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex couple.

The case began back in January 2013, when Aaron and Melissa Klein, owners of the since-closed Sweet Cakes by Melissa bakery just outside Portland, Oregon, cited their religious beliefs when declining to make a wedding cake for Rachel and Laurel Bowman-Cryer.

Following the incident, the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries found the Kleins in violation of a 2007 state law that protects the rights of LGBTQ people in employment, housing and public accommodations. In 2015, the couple was ordered to pay the Bowman-Cryers emotional distress damages.
Court rules against Oregon bakers who refused to make gay wedding cake

Happy New Years too, THESE LOSER MENTAL ANAL RELIGIOUS BOY RAPE SUPPORTER BAKER MORONS. As you will always bake cakes for raper priest klans roaming our streets. Following fake gods, does suck folks, as shown here by these losers. And costly as well. For what in the end? Just to show others
who are the sickest mental thinkers, walking the planet are.

Melissa and Aaron Klein have been ordered to pay $135,000 to a lesbian couple the bakers declined to make a cake for. (Courtesy Sweet Cakes by Melissa)
“Support Sweet Cakes by Melissa”, which raised over $100,000 before it was shut down by GoFundMe, who stated that the campaign was not compatible with their terms of service.

WOW? The cake would have made them a few bucks. But they wanted to give them a 135K Cash wedding gift..LOL!

BTW: Really, these folks still follow gods after the church paid out 600-1.3 billion in damages for raping kids. WTF is with that? Preist ASSAULT on children (rape) okay
and still follows fake lords. but if, two adults, legal ones, and their personal sexual relationship is not to be allowed, and protested by mentally sick bakers. WTF is with THAT?

I think the smarter thing to do would have been just to make the cake for the stupid Queers and put a little "surprise" in the frosting for them since they are too uppity simply to walk down the street and take their business to the next place!

I always thought they should've made a cake with some guy with turds all over his mouth suckling his partner. Take it or leave it. There is no law that says you must serve a GOOD homo cake.

 

[Baz Ares]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Tell that to a Muslim bakery.

Make up your mind. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

They only follow the lords laws. Or the rape priest made up ones on Sunday for some reason.

btw: If you really dig into them, you find out most are not 100%ers believing fully in the almighty. WTF is THAT SHIT?

 

[BULLDOG]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Nowhere in the Constitution is there anything that even hints at the idea that government ought to have the power to compel anyone to waive any of his essential Constitutional rights as a condition of being allowed to make an honest living.

You're absolutely right. However, laws governing how businesses treat their customers are constitutional. The business was sued, and the owners are responsible for the actions of their business.

 

[WillowTree]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Tell that to a Muslim bakery.

Make up your mind. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

Obama ignored the law did you rant about that?

 

[BULLDOG]

Where in the constitution does it say one has to provide goods and services? There is a supreme court precedent regarding anti-discrimination, based on xyz, yet no direct verbiage in the constitution. So maybe its the courts that need to interpret law not write and create law.
Ore-gone, nothing more needs to be said.

One has to ask themselves why didn't they just find another baker? or is it they wanted to ram their lifestyle down the throats of people they knew in advance help strong religious beliefs?

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

IT'S THEIR PRIVATE PROPERTY.

if you go there, YOU have to follow their rules.

Criminal leftists don't recognize anybody's private property. You'll never get him to acknowledge it exists. They think everything is theirs.

The owners of that private property are responsible for the business operated on that property. The business broke the law.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Where in the constitution does it say one has to provide goods and services? There is a supreme court precedent regarding anti-discrimination, based on xyz, yet no direct verbiage in the constitution. So maybe its the courts that need to interpret law not write and create law.
Ore-gone, nothing more needs to be said.

One has to ask themselves why didn't they just find another baker? or is it they wanted to ram their lifestyle down the throats of people they knew in advance help strong religious beliefs?

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

IT'S THEIR PRIVATE PROPERTY.

if you go there, YOU have to follow their rules.

Criminal leftists don't recognize anybody's private property. You'll never get him to acknowledge it exists. They think everything is theirs.

The owners of that private property are responsible for the business operated on that property. The business broke the law.

The case is still being adjudicated.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

RAW Eggs carries the salmonella deadly virus. Does that count?

Salmonella is caused by a bacteria, not a virus.

 

[Baz Ares]

Where in the constitution does it say one has to provide goods and services? There is a supreme court precedent regarding anti-discrimination, based on xyz, yet no direct verbiage in the constitution. So maybe its the courts that need to interpret law not write and create law.
Ore-gone, nothing more needs to be said.

One has to ask themselves why didn't they just find another baker? or is it they wanted to ram their lifestyle down the throats of people they knew in advance help strong religious beliefs?

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

IT'S THEIR PRIVATE PROPERTY.

if you go there, YOU have to follow their rules.

Criminal leftists don't recognize anybody's private property. You'll never get him to acknowledge it exists. They think everything is theirs.

The owners of that private property are responsible for the business operated on that property. The business broke the law.

I guess the way to handle thangs in the Great Douche new world order...

" Employee goes to work. Say what? No Satan car parts sold here" Or no Cross over the stalls WTF? Could be a reason why.

4 people dead, including gunman, in shooting at SW Houston mechanic shop, police say- KPRC
Former mechanic shop employee kills two employees, himself, police say

I'm not sure who was the 4th dead? Maybe he shot the image of the sick asshole jesus?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

However, laws governing how businesses treat their customers are constitutional. The business was sued, and the owners are responsible for the actions of their business.

A law that directly contradicts the Constitution, and which violates rights which the Constitution explicitly affirms, is not Constitutional, no matter how you can get any corrupt judge or court to rule.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The owners of that private property are responsible for the business operated on that property. The business broke the law.

The Constitution is the highest law. It is government which is breaking the law, when it attempts to enact and enforce lesser laws which overtly violate the Constitution.

 

[BULLDOG]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Tell that to a Muslim bakery.

Make up your mind. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

They only follow the lords laws. Or the rape priest made up ones on Sunday for some reason.

btw: If you really dig into them, you find out most are not 100%ers believing fully in the almighty. WTF is THAT SHIT?

That's interesting, but it doesn't answer the question. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

 

[BULLDOG]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Tell that to a Muslim bakery.

Make up your mind. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

Obama ignored the law did you rant about that?

Did Obama have a Bakery? This thread is about the homophobic bakery.

 

[Aba Incieni]

Nowhere in the constitution does it say anyone has to open a business supplying goods and/or services. However, if they do, there are certain rules they must follow.

Tell that to a Muslim bakery.

Make up your mind. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

They only follow the lords laws. Or the rape priest made up ones on Sunday for some reason.

btw: If you really dig into them, you find out most are not 100%ers believing fully in the almighty. WTF is THAT SHIT?

That's interesting, but it doesn't answer the question. Do you think religious nuts should be able to ignore the law or not?

Do cities get to ignore the law?

 

[Baz Ares]

RAW Eggs carries the salmonella deadly virus. Does that count?

Salmonella is caused by a bacteria, not a virus.

I say its both. The organisms can be transferred from person to person by both direct saliva, fecal/oral spread, by way of a kissing.
Viruses can infect all types of life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.