Originalism, which Amy Coney Barrett espouses, simply means the words of the Constitution are the law.

[meaner gene]

I went over it. Citizens united gave corporations the rights normally held for individuals. Such as contributing to political candidates.

Um, Unions have been contributing to candidates for decades, you blithering nincompoop.

Only from funds contributed separately from union dues.

 

[Nostra]

Please quote the part of the Constitution that says "If you have X number of people together, the individual right to exercise your freedom of religion is denied".

I'll await your dumbass spin..................

I'm going with OKtexas that the 1st amendment is an individual right.

I accept your concession you can't quote the part of the Constitution that backs up your lies.

I'm shocked!

 

[Nostra]

You're getting slow with that shit. I already posted the case 15 minutes before you asked for a link.

That link didn't back up your bullshit. Get a real one, Moron.

It does. But you have to read it.

It doesn't. Maybe you should read it...........or have a third grader read it for you and explain it to you.

 

[Nostra]

Are you saying unions should have their income taxed like they are corporations? If not, why not?

They don't make a profit, so like Trump they wouldn't pay taxes anyway. That provision only allows them to carry money past the fiscal year.

They don't make a profit??????????????????????

They produce nothing and take in millions, Idiot

 

[Nostra]

I went over it. Citizens united gave corporations the rights normally held for individuals. Such as contributing to political candidates.

Um, Unions have been contributing to candidates for decades, you blithering nincompoop.

Only from funds contributed separately from union dues.

Unions FORCE working folks to pay dues, which they take and donate to Dimwingers without asking members if that is what they want.

Corporations donate to politicians. If their investors don't like where they donate their money they are free to take their money elsewhere to invest. Unions offer no such option.

 

[meaner gene]

I accept your concession you can't quote the part of the Constitution that backs up your lies.

I'm shocked!

You won't find the right to vote in the constitution either.

 

[Nostra]

I accept your concession you can't quote the part of the Constitution that backs up your lies.

I'm shocked!

You won't find the right to vote in the constitution either.

Not sure how your post has any bearing on the lie you were caught in.

 

[meaner gene]

Are you saying unions should have their income taxed like they are corporations? If not, why not?

They don't make a profit, so like Trump they wouldn't pay taxes anyway. That provision only allows them to carry money past the fiscal year.

They don't make a profit??????????????????????

They produce nothing and take in millions, Idiot

Union dues may be used to support a wide variety of programs or activities, including paying the salaries and benefits of union leaders and staff; union governance; legal representation; legislative lobbying; pension, health, welfare and safety funds and the union strike fund.

 

[Nostra]

Are you saying unions should have their income taxed like they are corporations? If not, why not?

They don't make a profit, so like Trump they wouldn't pay taxes anyway. That provision only allows them to carry money past the fiscal year.

They don't make a profit??????????????????????

They produce nothing and take in millions, Idiot

Union dues may be used to support a wide variety of programs or activities, including paying the salaries and benefits of union leaders and staff; union governance; legal representation; legislative lobbying; pension, health, welfare and safety funds and the union strike fund.

Sounds like profits they are using to me....................

You lose again, Halfwit.

 

[meaner gene]

Um, Unions have been contributing to candidates for decades, you blithering nincompoop.

Unions FORCE working folks to pay dues, which they take and donate to Dimwingers without asking members if that is what they want.

.Mar 4, 2005
Makes it illegal for labor organizations to make contributions to, or expenditures on behalf of, a political candidate or committee from union dues


Using Union Dues for Political Purposes
www.cga.ct.gov › rpt

 

[Nostra]

Um, Unions have been contributing to candidates for decades, you blithering nincompoop.

Unions FORCE working folks to pay dues, which they take and donate to Dimwingers without asking members if that is what they want.

.Mar 4, 2005
Makes it illegal for labor organizations to make contributions to, or expenditures on behalf of, a political candidate or committee from union dues
Using Union Dues for Political Purposes
www.cga.ct.gov › rpt

Not sure why you think a useless South Carolina law has any bearing on the discussion, Simpleton.

 

[meaner gene]

Not sure how your post has any bearing on the lie you were caught in.

Revisit US V Miler. It said that bank records were not "personal" records, and had no 4th amendment protections.

 

[Nostra]

Not sure how your post has any bearing on the lie you were caught in.

Revisit US V Miler. It said that bank records were not "personal" records, and had no 4th amendment protections.

Once again... Not sure how your post has any bearing on the lie you were caught in.

 

[meaner gene]

They don't make a profit??????????????????????

They produce nothing and take in millions, Idiot

Union dues may be used to support a wide variety of programs or activities, including paying the salaries and benefits of union leaders and staff; union governance; legal representation; legislative lobbying; pension, health, welfare and safety funds and the union strike fund.

Sounds like profits they are using to me....................

You lose again, Halfwit.

They also sound like the US Government. Which you are now classifying as a profit making business.

 

[OKTexas]

I accept your concession you can't quote the part of the Constitution that backs up your lies.

I'm shocked!

You won't find the right to vote in the constitution either.

See Article 1 Section 2, the 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments

.

 

[Nostra]

They don't make a profit??????????????????????

They produce nothing and take in millions, Idiot

Union dues may be used to support a wide variety of programs or activities, including paying the salaries and benefits of union leaders and staff; union governance; legal representation; legislative lobbying; pension, health, welfare and safety funds and the union strike fund.

Sounds like profits they are using to me....................

You lose again, Halfwit.

They also sound like the US Government. Which you are now classifying as a profit making business.

Once again you have nothing to diminish the fact you were caught in yet another lie.

Keep digging, Simpleton.

 

[OKTexas]

Not sure how your post has any bearing on the lie you were caught in.

Revisit US V Miler. It said that bank records were not "personal" records, and had no 4th amendment protections.

No it said a banks compliance with a duly issued subpoena didn't violate the 4th Amendment rights of the individual. Learn how to read.

.

 

[MarcATL]

Adhering to "originalism" would result in this woman not being where she is in life.

She would have been relegated to a life in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant.

 

[meaner gene]

Um, Unions have been contributing to candidates for decades, you blithering nincompoop.

Unions FORCE working folks to pay dues, which they take and donate to Dimwingers without asking members if that is what they want.

.Mar 4, 2005
Makes it illegal for labor organizations to make contributions to, or expenditures on behalf of, a political candidate or committee from union dues
Using Union Dues for Political Purposes
www.cga.ct.gov › rpt

Not sure why you think a useless South Carolina law has any bearing on the discussion, Simpleton.

The Supreme Court decision called the Communication Workers of America v. Beck acknowledged that unions do not have the right to use for political purposes the dues of workers or non-members who object to those political activities.

 

[Zorro!]

Adhering to "originalism" would result in this woman not being where she is in life.

She would have been relegated to a life in the kitchen barefoot and pregnant.

Fake News. Neither Constitution Nor Law prevents the Notorious ACB from being the wonderful successful woman she is. And she is GOING TO THE SUPREME COURT!