- Thread starter
- #101
Having had, in recent weeks, some interesting, mostly cordial but also a few contentious exchanges over matters of faith:
I have to believe that those who are convinced that others of us are false teachers, false witnesses, false prophets are speaking from sincere conviction.
I have to believe those who are convinced that others of us are headed straight for hell are speaking from sincere conviction.
I have to believe that those who are convinced that some of the rest of us are not 'saved' are speaking from sincere conviction.
I have to believe the fundamentalists and Bible literalists who are convinced that other interpretations are error, heresy, and/or evil are speaking from sincere conviction.
I have to believe the agnostics and non-religious who enjoy joining in religious discussions are sincere in their interest.
And I have to believe the Atheist, non-religionist, non-believer who come to religious threads are also speaking from conviction, at least conviction they want validated.
So. . . .
So are those who cannot put their intellect, reason, and logic aside in matters of belief, conscience, faith, and their understanding of the Scriptures all to be considered infidels? Delusional? Heretics? False prophets? False teachers? False witnesses?
Is there no room for differences of opinion? Different interpretations? Different understandings? To believe something that doesn't jive with our childhood teachings? Must we all believe exactly the same in order to be orthodox or the real deal or to love or worship the one true God?
I am of the school that faith, from whatever tradition, is blessed and used by God. And I also believe our intelligence, our ability to study and understand, to research, to embrace deeper truths, to reason and apply logical conclusions to evidence are also gifts of God that can bless us and will be used for his purposes. We do not have to put logic, common sense, and the evidence before us on the back burner in order to be children of God.
It is that last concept that I would like to discuss - cordially and without rancor please - in this thread.
In the words of the prophet Isaiah, "Come let us reason together."
But fox, what you ask for works only if one portion of those you described puts their beliefs on the back burner to accommodate others' opinions. Our belief includes not doing that. Christians aren't called to compromise their positions so as to consider the beliefs of others, or even to tell you, "To each his own". For us, in this area, it is the opposite. We believe your life depends on Christ.
When John the Baptist was in the dungeon screaming at the top of his lungs for the King to leave his brother's wife alone, it CERTAINLY wasn't for John's benefit. His concern was for the man that was about to cut John's head off. It is that important to us.
I could say to you, faith, in any form is all good. Or that as long as you believe in something that's all that matters, and if it works for you, God will honor it. The school that taught you that did you a grave disservice. The Biblical God never, never included faith in idol worship, or any other God before Him as acceptable, no matter how strong your faith in the idol is. According to you, those who believe that the sun is God, will be blessed by the Biblical God of Abraham for their trust in sunshine. (if that's the God you are referring to as the one who will accept any form of faith) The opposite is true. He will leave your fate to the sun.
Christians are followers of Christ, We are called to inform the world of His faith in us. Not the other way around. On any other subject I would welcome any knowledge you have to offer. When it comes to your salvation however, I can't be compelled to consider any other alternative except that which places your eternal soul safely in the hands of our Father. You're my sister. I'm rigid in that regard.![]()
But Irish, whatever gave you the idea that I EVER said that the "Sun is God?" Or that it was okay to believe that? Or that it is okay to believe whatever you wish? What did I say that gave that impression? I need to know so I am careful not to say it again.
I can say absolutely with strong conviction that the Son is God because he said that he was. So if he is not, then Jesus of Nazareth was delusional and a false prophet himself and faith in him would be of no value to anybody.
At the same time, I can't believe that God would condemn somebody because their belief is that Jesus was divine and the messiah and by his life, death, and resurrection he offers us eternal life - BUT - the Christ is a separate being from the Father. So whether we believe One God in three persons, or three persons = one God, I just don't think God puts a great deal of importance on such technicalities.
Such concepts--especially those of doctrines of the Trinity--tore the church asunder for centuries. Obviously, if you read the words of Chuckt and Jeremiah here, such technicalities still do.
I am of the school that I put my life and future in Jesus's hands and trust him to do what is best with that. And, as he leads, I am given opportunity to introduce him to others who need to know how much he loves them and the eternal life that he offers.
And he sometimes finds the dangest ways to make that happen. I am not given authority to save anybody. Just license to arrange the meeting with somebody who is.
But where you and I might find an area to amicably fuss about, is whether that Sun (sun not son) worshipper or others who do not yet know the living Christ are blessed by God. Are loved by God. Regardless of their beliefs at the time, God has sure called a lot of really wierd and strange people into his service. I like to think I am one of them.
Last edited: