Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
I get it ...you aren't bright enough to understand what I said ...all of this non-sense of yours about political operatives, and denouncing .... I clearly pointed out that she can't see these emails that she had released, until it is released by the courts ... only the courts get to say what is released not hillary ... hence she can't have political operatives spin, or have them denouncing them yet why??? because they haven't seen them yet ... you make all this opinions of yours whats should happen but for some political reason they won't happen ... you can't seem to grasp she can't do anything if there is a violation ... you can't understand that .. ... I get it ... stupid comes to mindyou sure do like to make shit up ... the courts made the release dates, not clinton ... nor does she have any access to any of the emails being released, the courts have to determine if they are classified that she was ordered to release ... she was ordered to show 55,000 emails ... she has given 45,000 emails so far none of them were consider classified when she receive them ... and who cares if you mark your words, your words are nothing more then a conservatives hating a dam/liberal thats it ... all you allegations here are just that allegations or opinion ... what you think it is compared to your biased opinion base on your opinion of dems/liberals not what is realityOVER 1,000 classified documents mis-handled, illegally sent/received/stored, destroyed, perjury, etc.... I just do not see how this can all be made to go away without criminal charges or some legal repercussions....or an Obama pen/phone pardon. Anythi g short of it all going away, though, damages her chances of winning in 2016.
No matter what, she has already proven she can't be trusted with classified / our national security. Even her own staff, at the very least, has described her as 'often confused' and 'technology challenged' .... just what we need as President.
![]()
It goes away like this, launch an investigation, float out stories about how the law was broken, and make it stretch out over a couple of months. This allows the political operatives to denounce those questioning the ethics of what she did and to put doubt into people's head. It also allows for people to just get tired of hearing about the story.
Then those doing the investigation report their is nothing that raises to the level of being charged with a crime. Then the political operatives crow about how it was all nothing more then a witch hunt. So it goes from being a political negative to a political positive and this is what is going to happen with Mrs. Clinton. Mark my words and i hope by May you are throwing them back in my face, but I seriously doubt that will happen.
It helps if the political operatives find someone else on the other side who has done something similar thus diluting the situation with BS. But that is not really required just icing on the cake.
None of what you posted is counter to what I posted, matter of fact you support exactly what I posted. Hey, you are right though, I do hate people that openly lie to us.
And you double down. None of what you posted makes a hill of beans and counters nothing that I posted, matter of fact you are doing exactly what I said political operatives would do. YOU admit to not seeing some alleged emails so how in the hell can you be so sure in what they say or their classification, you can't.
I will also point out something to you, when i make a factual claim there is something called a link included. So if you want to make factual claims we need verification and source. Even though it will more then likely be the dailykos.