Over 70% Of Democrats Think Hillary Should Still Run Even If Indicted

[Carla_Danger]

Bill Mahr is a comedian, you boob.

In the same way Rush Limbaugh is, Cruella.

Where's his stand-up routine? Doesn't have one you say?

 

[paperview]

Legally she can't if indicted.

IF

Not even if --

The Constitution states clearly the qualifications for President.

No Federal law can change that.

Of course a federal law could change that.


"No party may nominate a candidate who is under federal investigation to fill ANY elected position."

Of course , such a law would mothball the Democratic Party, so that is unlikely to happen.

1. The law you propose is blatantly unconstitutional.
2. Stupid on stilts.

Unconstitional my ass. What kind of fucking moron thinks a law that keeps criminals out of office is unconstitutional? LOL

Are you this thick? An indictment is not a guilty verdict.

2. Congress can't pass laws about the nominating procedure for any respective party.

 

[HenryBHough]

What has she ever been indicted or convicted of?

Why am I not surprised that you find the word "if" so challenging?

 

[rdean]

Democrats want a known criminal in the White House. According to Rasmussen 71% of Democrat voters want her to keep running even if she's indicted. This is no surprise because Democrats have been putting criminals in office for decades. Half of all voters don't seem to mind for one reason or another. Seems the media has succeeded in dumbing down America.

50% Say Clinton Should Keep Running Even If Indicted

She would have to break the law to be indicted.

 

[mudwhistle]

Here's a question. If the FBI revokes her security clearance, what then? Can a person who can't qualify for a security clearance be President?

A president has security clearances. There are no qualifiers to the job of president besides what is spelled out in the US Constitution.

You obviously don't know how security clearances work. The FBI and the FBI alone decides who has security clearance, not even the POTUS can over ride their decision, though of course they could theoretically fire FBI Directors until they find one willing to grant clearance to someone who has previously been denied.

No. No.

and nono.

The FBI does not override the powers granted to a president, and that is a total and full automatic security clearance upon oath of office.

You'd have to be a doofus to think otherwise.

Which is precisely why she should never be president.

It's too dangerous. The risk that she'll do this again, or worse, and simply cover it up like she always does is too great.

 

[mudwhistle]

Democrats want a known criminal in the White House. According to Rasmussen 71% of Democrat voters want her to keep running even if she's indicted. This is no surprise because Democrats have been putting criminals in office for decades. Half of all voters don't seem to mind for one reason or another. Seems the media has succeeded in dumbing down America.

50% Say Clinton Should Keep Running Even If Indicted

She would have to break the law to be indicted.

Nope. You can indict a ham-sandwich.

Fact is, Hillary is too big to jail.

 

[bodecea]

Trump is with us on most issues. No matter though. A Presidency for him is "not in the cards," so to speak.

You hope, but polls show that isn't a fact. Hillary can't even beat Sanders in the Dem primary. I wouldn't count my chickens before they hatch.

Hillary is far ahead of Sanders. And as for counting chickens, the most important thing is who will be doing the counting

Son , you're a retard. But I'll say this, I'm glad that you never knew anyone who depended on classified material remaining classified to keep them safe. If you had , you wouldn't be so flippant about Hillary's crimes.

The crimes she's been indicted for?

Even your dumb ass knows that the investigation is ongoing and that lack of an indictment isn't an indication that crimes haven't been committed anyway.

Still waiting for that indictment we've been promised for months now.

 

[bodecea]

Here's a question. If the FBI revokes her security clearance, what then? Can a person who can't qualify for a security clearance be President?

A president has security clearances. There are no qualifiers to the job of president besides what is spelled out in the US Constitution.

You obviously don't know how security clearances work. The FBI and the FBI alone decides who has security clearance, not even the POTUS can over ride their decision, though of course they could theoretically fire FBI Directors until they find one willing to grant clearance to someone who has previously been denied.

No. No.

and nono.

The FBI does not override the powers granted to a president, and that is a total and full automatic security clearance upon oath of office.

You'd have to be a doofus to think otherwise.

A doofus is someone who doesn't ask questions. AKA a stupid partisan sheep.

As in the totally pathetic thing is, the woman belongs in prison and you doofuses are ready to elect her to be POTUS.

Based on what indictments and convictions?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

Where's his stand-up routine? Doesn't have one you say?

Really, I said that?

oh, you were just lying - DEMOCRAT.


Limbaugh used to do a monologue at the start of every show,

I haven't listened to him since the early 90's, but I suspect he still does.

Maher and Limbaugh are VERY similar in format.

 

[bodecea]

I take it you refused to read the 83-page report.

I take it you are enjoying your chase lounge as you drift down DENIAL RIVER.

Oh then you should have no problem telling us what crime she committed.

Did Where_r_my_brains ever answer your question about what crime Hillary committed?

Why would anyone waste their time answering your stupid questions? It's CLEAR that you'd vote for her if there was video of her killing another human being.

Meanwhile , Trump is an asshole for wanting to build a wall you liberals are retarded.

Ironically, that is the kind of thing that Drumpf brags about with HIS supporters.

This thread isn't about Trump, want to start one about the many stupid things he's said, go right ahead.

The difference is, I will go in and say "Yep Trump does and says stupid shit" you and the other idiotic liberals who defend Hillary at all costs on the other hand.

Continuing with the Irony.

 

[bodecea]

What has she ever been indicted or convicted of?

Why am I not surprised that you find the word "if" so challenging?

Still waiting for that long promised indictment.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Still waiting for that indictment we've been promised for months now.

You may be a troll shortbus, but goddamned are you fucking stupid...

I mean this with all sincerity.

 

[bodecea]

Democrats want a known criminal in the White House. According to Rasmussen 71% of Democrat voters want her to keep running even if she's indicted. This is no surprise because Democrats have been putting criminals in office for decades. Half of all voters don't seem to mind for one reason or another. Seems the media has succeeded in dumbing down America.

50% Say Clinton Should Keep Running Even If Indicted

She would have to break the law to be indicted.

Nope. You can indict a ham-sandwich.

Fact is, Hillary is too big to jail.

And yet....Hillary has not been indicted yet.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Forgive me of this is a dumb question, but can a person still run after being arrested?

God bless you always!!!

Holly

 

[Carla_Danger]

[

Where's his stand-up routine? Doesn't have one you say?

Really, I said that?

oh, you were just lying - DEMOCRAT.


Limbaugh used to do a monologue at the start of every show,

I haven't listened to him since the early 90's, but I suspect he still does.

Maher and Limbaugh are VERY similar in format.

Except one is funny and the other is a big fat ass drug addict.

 

[paperview]

Forgive me of this is a dumb question, but can a person still run after being arrested?

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Yes.

And the Q asked was should the candidate still run if indicted.

Flashback: When Rick Perry announced his bid for presidency last year --

he was


under indictment.

 

[Syriusly]

Here's a question. If the FBI revokes her security clearance, what then? Can a person who can't qualify for a security clearance be President?

A president has security clearances. There are no qualifiers to the job of president besides what is spelled out in the US Constitution.

You obviously don't know how security clearances work. The FBI and the FBI alone decides who has security clearance, not even the POTUS can over ride their decision, though of course they could theoretically fire FBI Directors until they find one willing to grant clearance to someone who has previously been denied.

No. No.

and nono.

The FBI does not override the powers granted to a president, and that is a total and full automatic security clearance upon oath of office.

You'd have to be a doofus to think otherwise.

A doofus is someone who doesn't ask questions. AKA a stupid partisan sheep.

As in the totally pathetic thing is, the woman belongs in prison and you doofuses are ready to elect her to be POTUS.

Once again- demonstrating my point:

Conservatives believe in guilty until proven innocent.

Liberals believe in innocent until proven guilty.

 

[Syriusly]

Forgive me of this is a dumb question, but can a person still run after being arrested?

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Yes.

And the Q asked was should the candidate still run if indicted.

Flashback: When Rick Perry announced his bid for presidency last year --

he was


under indictment.

LOL- I had forgotten that!

And yes- I felt the same way then.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Except one is funny and the other is a big fat ass drug addict.

I don't find either of them very funny.

Maher is bitter. Not quite Madcow bitter, but close.

Both are hacks, as are you.

 

[Syriusly]

Forgive me of this is a dumb question, but can a person still run after being arrested?

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Nothing in the Constitution would prevent it. Even a conviction would not prevent running. Though he might be impeached immediately upon election if he was convicted.