palin really is an idiot....

Oooooopsi. you PEOPLE on the Palin hate train are all phony frauds and should feel like a fool who can be led by nose by others

SNIP:
PETA Woman of the Year Posts Photo of a Child Standing on a Dog
Posted on January 02 2015 - 6:46 PM - Posted by: Whitney Pitcher | Follow on Twitter!




Yesterday, Governor Palin shared a seemingly benign "happy new year" Facebook post that included photos of her son Trig using their dog, Jill Hadassa, as a footstool of sorts. True to form, the media and the Left (pardon the redundancy) jumped at the opportunity to express their outrage. Animal rights groups also made their disapproval of the photos known as well, per POLITICO:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals called the post inappropriate.
“It’s odd that anyone — let alone a mother — would find it appropriate to post such a thing, with no apparent sympathy for the dog in the photo,” PETA President Ingrid Newkirk said in a statement to POLITICO.
It is odd, Ingrid, isn’t it? Let’s flashback to about six months ago to an image shared by Ellen Degeneres on her show’s Facebook page:

It’s odd that PETA did not make the same statement when Degeneres, their 2009 Woman of the Year, shared a similar photo with her more than 17 million Facebook friends this summer and received more than a quarter of a million likes. Wouldn’t PETA expect someone whom they honored to not condone such an action and photo, even if it didn’t not involve her or her child?

all of it here:
PETA Woman of the Year Posts Photo of a Child Standing on a Dog - Conservatives4Palin
 
Last edited:
if-i-had-a-dog.jpg
 
They should put that picture up on one of those sad neglected pet commercials.

God go get that poor dog out of there.
 
They should put that picture up on one of those sad neglected pet commercials.

God go get that poor dog out of there.

which one? Ellen's dog?



OR:
headexplodes.jpg

Sarah Palin. Making liberals heads explode since 2008.
 
Whiny, you're a CU*T and I don't take orders from a CU*T! Either show what you supposedly wrote, or you're a fucking LIAR... Balls in YOUR COURT, do it or STFU scumbag!
Who asked you to do anything, you flaming imbecile? You honestly think I give a flying fuck whether you believe me or not? :cuckoo:

So you're a fucking LIAR...we ALL knew that!
Wrong as usual, rightard. Just cause you're too lazy to find it doesn't mean I lied.

Besides, you're still stuck with the fact that the Republican led Congress failed to pass reform while they were in control. Your own link says so...

In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs.

Remind me again ... which party controlled Congress during those first 4 critical years?

What was interest rates and inflation rates in 1981? I'll keep asking you till you post it or run away.
WTF cares if you keep asking irrelevant questions? I gave you the NBER list of recessions and proved there was no recession. When Reagan be a me president.

Deal with it. Or don't. Who cares?

From the biased NY Times that full of shit.

What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.
 
:lmao: it's funny how you skip past 2003 ... no reform. 2004 ... no reform. Then you start in 2005 ... no reform. 2006 .... no reform.

But look! Even though :gay: vagisil :gay: found Republicans failed to pass reform for 4 years, Democrats are to blame because it took them a year and a half to get reform on Bush's desk.

:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:

They were held up by maneuvers in Congress...DIDN'T YOU READ THAT when you supposedly READ that article I posted a link to that the above timeline is from.... Here's the beginning of it for you whiny little bitch!

2001
  • April: The Administration's FY02 budget declares that the size of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is "a potential problem," because "financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity." (2002 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 142)
2002
  • May: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) calls for the disclosure and corporate governance principles contained in the President's 10-point plan for corporate responsibility to apply to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. (OMB Prompt Letter to OFHEO, 5/29/02)
2003
  • February: The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) releases a report explaining that unexpected problems at a GSE could immediately spread into financial sectors beyond the housing market.

  • September: Then-Treasury Secretary John Snow testifies before the House Financial Services Committee to recommend that Congress enact "legislation to create a new Federal agency to regulate and supervise the financial activities of our housing-related government sponsored enterprises" and set prudent and appropriate minimum capital adequacy requirements.

  • September: Then-House Financial Services Committee Ranking Member Barney Frank (D-MA) strongly disagrees with the Administration's assessment, saying "these two entities – Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – are not facing any kind of financial crisis … The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." (Stephen Labaton, "New Agency Proposed To Oversee Freddie Mac And Fannie Mae," The New York Times, 9/11/03)

  • October: Senator Thomas Carper (D-DE) refuses to acknowledge any necessity for GSE reforms, saying "if it ain't broke, don't fix it." (Sen. Carper, Hearing of Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 10/16/03)

  • November: Then-Council of the Economic Advisers (CEA) Chairman Greg Mankiw explains that any "legislation to reform GSE regulation should empower the new regulator with sufficient strength and credibility to reduce systemic risk." To reduce the potential for systemic instability, the regulator would have "broad authority to set both risk-based and minimum capital standards" and "receivership powers necessary to wind down the affairs of a troubled GSE." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Remarks At The Conference Of State Bank Supervisors State Banking Summit And Leadership, 11/6/03)
2004
  • February: The President's FY05 Budget again highlights the risk posed by the explosive growth of the GSEs and their low levels of required capital and calls for creation of a new, world-class regulator: "The Administration has determined that the safety and soundness regulators of the housing GSEs lack sufficient power and stature to meet their responsibilities, and therefore … should be replaced with a new strengthened regulator." (2005 Budget Analytic Perspectives, pg. 83)

  • February: Then-CEA Chairman Mankiw cautions Congress to "not take [the financial market's] strength for granted." Again, the call from the Administration was to reduce this risk by "ensuring that the housing GSEs are overseen by an effective regulator." (N. Gregory Mankiw, Op-Ed, "Keeping Fannie And Freddie's House In Order," Financial Times, 2/24/04)

  • April: Rep. Frank ignores the warnings, accusing the Administration of creating an "artificial issue." At a speech to the Mortgage Bankers Association conference, Rep. Frank said "people tend to pay their mortgages. I don't think we are in any remote danger here. This focus on receivership, I think, is intended to create fears that aren't there." ("Frank: GSE Failure A Phony Issue," American Banker, 4/21/04)

  • June: Then-Treasury Deputy Secretary Samuel Bodman spotlights the risk posed by the GSEs and calls for reform, saying "We do not have a world-class system of supervision of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), even though the importance of the housing financial system that the GSEs serve demands the best in supervision to ensure the long-term vitality of that system. Therefore, the Administration has called for a new, first class, regulatory supervisor for the three housing GSEs: Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banking System." (Samuel Bodman, House Financial Services Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations Testimony, 6/16/04)
You're too dumb for words, :gay: vagisil :gay:. Not only does that not cite a single "maneuver" which held up any bills .... it doesn't even cite any bills. All it does is show how Democrats were against reform.

But moron .... Democrats did not control the Congress between 2003 and 2006. Democrats did not control any of the committees. Republicans did and Frist sat on every reform bill. You said yourself he held them up like Reid held up bills.

Let me see I I can explain this to the forum, you're too fucking stupid to understand this.... Like the last Congress had Mclame, Graham, and a handful of other RINO Republican's that acted MUCH LIKE DemocRATS, the same people and others were involved in holding up legislation.... today we have.....

boehner-mcconnell.jpg


Need I say more, as I believe I got the correct message through to people with a 3 digit IQ.... Please PAWN, stop whining, you keep embarrassing yourself....as usual!
So now you've reduced your losing argument to RINO's held up the legislation??

What, the TRUTH too hard for you to believe? You've LIED so long you haven't got a clue what truth is anymore!
:gay: vagisil :gay:, you've proven here tonight that "truth" to you is whatever you can make up. This last piece of idiocy of yours proves it. You actually went from blaming Barney Frank to RINO's for failing to pass reform.

That highlights your insanity better than I ever could. By the eay, you lost this argument the moment you blamed Barney Frank. Was Barney Frank on the wrong side of the issue? Absofuckinglutely. Did Barney Frank kill any reform bills? No, he couldn't, you schvance. There were at least 5 bills attempting reform during those 5 Years between 2003 and 2007. One was originated in the House. Though Frank voted against it, he could not and did not prevent it from passing in the House. It died in the Senate because Senate leadership wouldn't put it on the legislative calendar for a full vote in the Senate. Two more bills originated in the Senate. Both made it out of committee but neither one was put to a full Senate vote. Again, House member Barney Frank could not and did not prevent either of those Senate bills from passing. The 4th bill was sponsored by Frank, so he clearly didn't prevent that one. The 5th was sponsored by Pelosi and Frank voted for it.
 
Imagine that pic of the Palin kid abusing that poor dog, Sarah laughing in the background and In The Arm of the Angel softly playing. That would bring in a lot!
 
This isn't over Stephanie. She did a very dumb thing posting that photo.
 
Imagine that pic of the Palin kid abusing that poor dog, Sarah laughing in the background and In The Arm of the Angel softly playing. That would bring in a lot!

oh Sarah, we already know you hate Palin so please give it rest.
 
This isn't over Stephanie. She did a very dumb thing posting that photo.

omg. so did Ellen. why is she let off the hook by you shallow political people in the democrat party? are you so out of anything to run on but petty shit on people? You all just lost all your power in congress because of STUFF like this. get a frikken clue and grow up
 
Even you must admit she fucked up. I know for sure you all would never allow your 7 year old (big) kid to stand on your dog like that.
 
Imagine that pic of the Palin kid abusing that poor dog, Sarah laughing in the background and In The Arm of the Angel softly playing. That would bring in a lot!

the only one laughing in this country is at people who follows PETA and the Lamestream media who posted this
Because as we see they as well as the Democrat base are just plain ole two faced HYPOCRITES
 
Even you must admit she fucked up. I know for sure you all would never allow your 7 year old (big) kid to stand on your dog like that.

what the hell Sarah. We've shown other pictures of kids standing on dogs. gawd get a life
 
This isn't political Steph. It's animal abuse and that asshole took a picture and posted it!
 
Who asked you to do anything, you flaming imbecile? You honestly think I give a flying fuck whether you believe me or not? :cuckoo:

So you're a fucking LIAR...we ALL knew that!
Wrong as usual, rightard. Just cause you're too lazy to find it doesn't mean I lied.

Besides, you're still stuck with the fact that the Republican led Congress failed to pass reform while they were in control. Your own link says so...

In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs.

Remind me again ... which party controlled Congress during those first 4 critical years?

What was interest rates and inflation rates in 1981? I'll keep asking you till you post it or run away.
WTF cares if you keep asking irrelevant questions? I gave you the NBER list of recessions and proved there was no recession. When Reagan be a me president.

Deal with it. Or don't. Who cares?

From the biased NY Times that full of shit.

What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.
Who asked you to do anything, you flaming imbecile? You honestly think I give a flying fuck whether you believe me or not? :cuckoo:

So you're a fucking LIAR...we ALL knew that!
Wrong as usual, rightard. Just cause you're too lazy to find it doesn't mean I lied.

Besides, you're still stuck with the fact that the Republican led Congress failed to pass reform while they were in control. Your own link says so...

In fact, it was Congress that flatly rejected President Bush's call more than five years ago to reform the GSEs.

Remind me again ... which party controlled Congress during those first 4 critical years?

What was interest rates and inflation rates in 1981? I'll keep asking you till you post it or run away.
WTF cares if you keep asking irrelevant questions? I gave you the NBER list of recessions and proved there was no recession. When Reagan be a me president.

Deal with it. Or don't. Who cares?

From the biased NY Times that full of shit.

What was the interest rate and inflation rate in 1981. This will point to a recession or not.
What the fuck does the New Times have to do with this?

Interest rates and inflation do not dictate recessions. Looking at inflation rates an interest rates during the Great Recession reveal that.

What do you think GDP has to do with recessions?

Regardless of your idiocy, I gave you a link to the NBER which shows there was no recession when Reagan became president; and you don't get to re-write history to fit into your biased partisan agenda.

Next?
 
This isn't political Steph. It's animal abuse and that asshole took a picture and posted it!

Sarah, that dog belongs to the child who has Downs Syndrome, as a special trained dog for the handicapped. get a frikken life.

As the Governor shared last Spring, the Palins received their beautiful dog from the Puppy Jake Foundation which trains dogs to be service animals for wounded warriors and others who need assistance. You can read more about the Foundation here.
 
That Downs kid can learn not to hurt the dog but with that idiot mother of his, maybe not...
 
That Downs kid can learn not to hurt the dog but with that idiot mother of his, maybe not...

Hate on. it's all you have inside you for Mrs. Palin. I hope you'll be able to sleep tonight because of this. I'm done over a frikken DOG WHEN you support abortion on demand.

Here's a cause you Palin haters can take up: you'd be more admired and be more Respected, that's for sure

 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top