Not2BSubjugated
Callous Individualist
Paul Ryan says American women need to have more babies
"I did my part, but we need to have higher birth rates in this country," said the father of three.
Aaron Rupar Dec 14, 2017, 4:33 pm
During a news conference on Thursday, House Speaker Paul Ryan urged American women to have more babies, saying their lack of procreation was stunting economic growth.
“People — this is going to be the new economic challenge for America. People,” Ryan said, in response to a question about entitlement reform.
Alluding to the fact that he’s a father of three, Ryan added, “I did my part, but we need to have higher birth rates in this country. Meaning, baby boomers are retiring, and we have fewer people following them in the work force.”
“We have something like a 90 percent increase in the retirement population in America, but only a 19 percent increase in the working population in American,” the Speaker continued. “So what do we have to do? Be smarter, more efficient, more technology — still going to need more people. And when we have tens of millions of people right here in this country falling short of their potential — not working, not looking for a job, or not in school getting a skill to get a job — that’s a problem.”
Paul Ryan says American women need to have more babies
Ryan is right. Any economist will tell you that we need a larger population in order to have robust economic growth.
And since prosperous nations tend to have declining birth rates, then the obvious solution is to increase immigration.
You hit the nail on the head.Why not allow in more immigrants? Maybe go to 2 million per year!
Ryan is NOT a millennial.
Why make a comparison when there is none?
If you are trying to make a point, try again because you are creeping up on Epic FAIL status.
....
Seriously?
I've made my point already, pretty clearly. It's not my fault that you're not getting it. I'm not sure how it's possible not to, but ... I guess it's not really my problem.
Why are you comparing apples to oranges? If you are trying to say millennials cannot afford to have children, then just say it! Why bring bullshit about Ryan's finances into the discussion?
I have three children who are all millennials. The older two already have children of their own. How did they manage to pull off the impossible?
He's saying we need to have more children when most of us can't and he can.
That's it. That's the ultra-super-complex point (apparently) that I've been making.
It's not "impossible" to have kids as a millennial, but it's a lot harder when you have college debt. Not everyone has said debt and that's cool, good for those people, but when tuition is as insane as it is right now, don't sit there with your millions and tell people to have kids that they can't afford.
Because if they do, and need government assistance at any point, you know damn well you'd condemn them for that as well.
Simple solution! Don't go into debt to go to college! DUH!
Ryan's Dad died when he was 16. He saved his Social Security payments to go to college.
My youngest daughter just graduated from college last spring. Her college debt? Zero dollars and zero cents.
That's nice man. But a lot of people do end up with debt, so ... I guess people aren't perfect? ,Maybe not everyone grows up at the same rate, or has parents who teach them about this stuff? Shit happens. College expenses have increased by, what, at least 500 % since our parents went to college, adjusted for inflation? We were disadvantaged in that sense from day 1. The boomers don't realize how much more expensive and difficult things have become for young people, especially in the years after 2008. That's why it's so easy for them to sit there and complain that we're not starting families and act like all we want to do is sit around in our parents' basements.
The last place most kids in their parents' basements want to be in is in their parents' basement.
We should be investing in education in our current children.
We do. But academic studies show that education outcome to be primarily driven by parental involvement.
With sky rocketing illegitimacy, we are going to have a problem with education.
Not to mention possible race based achievement gaps.
anti-choice, anti-birth control religious zealots really shouldn't talk about illegitimacy. but it's a choice that most millennials are making.
the best contraindicator of unwed motherhood is education. you want women not to have kids out of wedlock, send them to college.
Why Are So Many Millennials Having Children Out of Wedlock?
1. Your partisan spin is noted and dismissed.
2. Are the girls having children out of wedlock because of no college or because that is what their mothers did and it is seen as normal?
3. From your linked article.
The study also found a correlation between an area’s high unemployment rates and a greater likelihood that a man would have a child out of wedlock. For both men and women, the larger the availability of medium-skilled jobs, the more likely they were to marry before having their first child. Why exactly, does the economy play a role in marriage decisions? The researchers give this explanation: Men without well-paying jobs are not seen as marriage material. “These men would be less desirable as marriage partners because of their reduced earning potential,”
We need better jobs for medium skilled workers, or semi skilled. And for that matter, low skilled.
4. Better than more colleges is reforms to reduce unreasonable demands for degrees for low paying jobs. I've seen too many jobs that demand college while not offering the pay to justify the expense.
Says one of the most base partisans on the board. Having read your screeds, I'm going to wager you have never voted for any democrat in any race.
And I never said that a four year college was for everyone. I am also a proponent of trade high schools.
But the disdain the radical right has for education is pathetic and based on resentment that educated people don't believe in either your revisionist history or science denial.
In other words, they're smart and educated and the women don't have to be tethered to a stove for some guy to pay for them while they remain barefoot and pregnant.
So let's tell the truth about what Paul Ryan and the rabid right really want.
And there is the basis of the anti science, anti education, misogynist stupidity of the trump era which leads the randian loon Paul Ryan to say oh white women need to make more babies.
Women make fewer babies when they're educated. Why? We go to school. We work. We get great jobs. And when we're ready for our first child (sometimes only as in my case), we're about 30, not 22 like my mother.
Oh, is immigration the obvious solution? Could you cite me an example of a country that became economically prosperous to the point that birth rates declined into negative growth territory, who then had a large influx of migrant workers and became a powerhouse once more?
Fuck me, I love that people could consider an unproven hypothesis as an OBVIOUS answer to a problem as complex as macroeconomics