Why would she lose? Because the Republican senate is covering for a criminal president who obstructed justice, and in the meantime, Republicans in the Senate can continue to trash their oath of office? Answer, that's exactly why they would do it.All 'Jabba-Jerry' needs to do is go to Nancy and lay out the 'proof' and then Nancy will call for Trump's impeachment right?That's once again by all these Trump toads a lie. Nadler presented concrete proof of obstruction via Mueller's own words. 1000 prosecutors agree with Mueller. Game over and the bs ends. You can keep pedaling the same lies but it is too late.I'm not complaining about the price tag but rather noting that much time and treasure were expended by many highly qualified DOJ & FBI professionals.The $35 million dollar investigation didn't cost that after Manafort surrendered all his assets. You must not have understood my answer when you asked the first time? Are you acting like a child, or are you deliberately holding out on us? You know, the part where it saysYou remain bitterly delusional. Dems have held a House majority since January and the Mueller Report since March. They still haven't even started formal impeachment because after The Muel Team's exhaustive, 2yr $35 million witch-hunt they just don't have evidence of criminality.On both counts you are wrong. "Collusion" was found, but Mueller didn't feel he had enough for criminal conspiracy. Obstruction based on Mueller's findings and testimony do reveal textbook obstruction. He didn't render the decision because he can't, based on the rules. But Congress can. And 1000 prosecutors now say Trump obstructed. There is no further need to question obstruction, because it was found.
You'd have to be either a liar, or totally misinformed on what obstruction is, an infant child, or totally retarded, not to conclude Trump obstructed justice, based on Mueller's own words in the report.
Yanno, nothing else anyone says trumps the fact that The Muel Team found no criminality on the part of the President.You do know you aren't a child who thinks he can hide the jar of candy in the kitchen under the bed right? We assume you aren't a child with the mind of one, right?
Did you just happen to forget to tell us the other part of what Mueller told us, or were you just mocking a child?
We do not prosecute and should not persecute anyone for crimes they have not committed. Don't you agree?
And you never answered my question: what do you suppose Mueller meant by "...this report does not find that the President committed a crime...?"
they didn't find where he didn't commit a crime either?
Now once more for the Brain-dead: a prosecutorial witch-hunt does not seek evidence of innocence but rather evidence of criminality which, as we all know, the Muel Team DID NOT FIND. No crimes by the POTUS.
I am relieved to know our prez is neither a criminal nor a Russian agent. You seem infuriated by the revelation.
The crazy bitch KNOWS the DEMs will lose if she tries to impeach Trump.
Wait for the IG's report comes out. Then you'll have a couple of years worth of posting inane defenses against all the DEMs going to prison.