Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you saw Ashli Babbitt bearing arms against the US? You're a liar. The punishment for trespassing is not murder/summary execution. You talk out both sides of your big mouth--George Floyd, a violent criminal/drug addict dies during an arrest and you advocate riots for the better part of a year, but let a veteran break a window, heaven forbid, and we MUST BURN HER AT THE STAKE. GFY, nobody else will.i believe my own eyes & ears witnessing what happened live on TV.
you believe in a fantasy portrayed by failed reality 'star'.
You are totally right and IGNORE is a proper and useful option for dealing with mentallySo you saw Ashli Babbitt bearing arms against the US? You're a liar. The punishment for trespassing is not murder/summary execution. You talk out both sides of your big mouth--George Floyd, a violent criminal/drug addict dies during an arrest and you advocate riots for the better part of a year, but let a veteran break a window, heaven forbid, and we MUST BURN HER AT THE STAKE. GFY, nobody else will.
100% confirmed even by her.
I put no one on ignore because I love seeing how stupid their stupid shit really is.You are totally right and IGNORE is a proper and useful option for dealing with mentally
unbalanced rodents looking for attention.
I would suggest using it as I have. Works for me.
Some historic society guy jabbering on means ZeroFact checking Rep. Jordan’s claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6
By Tara Subramaniam and Holmes Lybrand, CNN
Published 8:19 PM EDT, Wed July 21, 2021
Jane L. Campbell, president and CEO of the US Capitol Historical Society, told CNN that “the Speaker of the House does not oversee security of the US Capitol, nor does this official oversee the Capitol Police Board.”
Pelosi also cannot unduly influence who is appointed to the Board, which consists of the House and Senate Sergeants at Arms, the Architect of the Capitol and the Chief of the Capitol Police. The Sergeants at Arms are elected and must be confirmed by their respective chambers and the Architect must be confirmed by both chambers of Congress.
And according to testimony from the former Capitol Police chief, Pelosi was not involved in the decisions made ahead of January 6 regarding the National Guard. In his testimony before the Senate in February, former US Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said that he approached both Sergeants at Arms on the House and Senate side on January 4 to request the National Guard through an Emergency Declaration from the Capitol Police Board.
Fact checking Rep. Jordan's claim that Speaker Pelosi was responsible for US Capitol security on January 6
Posts falsely cite Pelosi as responsible for security during Capitol insurrection
By BEATRICE DUPUYJanuary 20, 2021
Posts falsely cite Pelosi as responsible for security during Capitol insurrection
Fact check: U.S. Capitol Police Board oversees the force, along with congressional committees
PolitiFact - No, Capitol security is not only Pelosi’s responsibility, but she bears some
She should have done it this way in the first place.Looks like Pelosi is moving forward with her select committee.
Adam Kinzinger will be on the committee.
Pelosi only needs to appoint one more republican.
The committee is supposed to start their work next week.
Pelosi appoints 2nd GOP critic of Trump to Jan. 6 committee
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Sunday named a second Republican critic of Donald Trump, Rep. Adam Kinzinger, to a special committee investigating the Capitol riot and pledged that the Democratic-majority panel will “get to the truth.” Kinzinger said he “humbly accepted” the appointment even as...www.aol.com
The House has no powers of enforcement and if you bothered to read what you posted, when someone ignores those petty windbags, they are referred to DoJ. Many people have simply ignored Congress, and nothing happens to them. Go ahead and take the totalitarian path, please, oh please, set that precedent.
IF????
they are investigating as well. as they should. but certainly not alone.
lol....
Investigations & Oversight
Origins
The constitutional framers assumed that Congress would conduct investigations as the British House of Commons conducted them. James Wilson of Pennsylvania, a future Supreme Court Justice and Convention delegate, wrote in a 1774 essay that members of the Commons were considered “grand inquisitors of the realm. The proudest ministers of the proudest monarchs have trembled at their censures; and have appeared at the bar of the house, to give an account of their conduct, and ask pardon for their faults.” When the U.S. House convened in 1789, it established an early set of select committees, such as Rules and Ways and Means, to structure the legislative process including investigations.
Subpoena Power and Contempt
The House has compelled the attendance of witnesses since 1795, when it investigated an attempt to bribe Members. Indeed, early cases of congressional subpoena and contempt powers focused on the abuse or discredit of the House itself. Robert Randall, a real estate speculator, had tried to purchase what is now Michigan from the federal government and share the proceeds with Members of Congress who approved the sale. As a result, Randall was the first individual held in contempt of Congress. The House Sergeant-at-Arms was authorized to arrest him and bring him before the House, where he was reprimanded and placed in a local jail for a week.
The House reformed and routinized its subpoena and contempt powers during the 19th century. Initially, it had authorized the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest those disregarding the orders of the House and bring them before its Membership. After an 1857 case involving a reporter for the New York Times who was held in contempt for not divulging his sources for a report concerning potential bribery of House Members, Congress passed the forbearer to the current law on contempt (2 USC §194). In that law, the failure of a witness to answer “any question pertinent” to a congressional investigation would prompt an investigation by the Department of Justice, as well as potential fines and jail time.
Investigations & Oversight | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives
you're welcome for the education.
So you saw Ashli Babbitt bearing arms against the US?
You're a liar.
The punishment for trespassing is not murder/summary execution.
You talk out both sides of your big mouth--George Floyd, a violent criminal/drug addict dies during an arrest and you advocate riots for the better part of a year, but let a veteran break a window, heaven forbid, and we MUST BURN HER AT THE STAKE. GFY, nobody else will.
The House has no powers of enforcement and if you bothered to read what you posted, when someone ignores those petty windbags, they are referred to DoJ. Many people have simply ignored Congress, and nothing happens to them. Go ahead and take the totalitarian path, please, oh please, set that precedent.
So anyone with a cell phone taking pictures is now considered dangerous and violent? You're a moron, does your hubby know that you are posting this nonsense?she was showing behavior that was dangerous & violent.
He's not a SCOTUS justice either, eh, plaything?uh-huh. merrick garland isn't bill barr.
The stupid bitch got shot attacking the capital. No one knew if she was armed or not so she got her silly ass blasted.So you saw Ashli Babbitt bearing arms against the US?
That's DoJ, just proving how utterly toothless those pansy Democrats really are.uh-huh. merrick garland isn't bill barr.
I have at least a dozen on ignore. It feels great, I have to say.I put no one on ignore because I love seeing how stupid their stupid shit really is.
As opposed to the fixed Ukraine hearings? Puh-leeze!All Trump Haters. No surprise. I'm sure their partisan Trump hating report will be seen as garbage.
Adam Kinzinger.As opposed to the fixed Ukraine hearings? Puh-leeze!
As the President says, everyone knows that if the vast majority of those insurrectionists were black, you would have had a very different out come.....and I guarantee that 5 or 6 deaths would have been a best case scenario.America needs to get over it and let it all go. It's only damaging to America's image to the rest of the world.
And to be completely frank about it: The police should have shot and killed enough of the protesters to send the unmistakable message that it's democracy would be defended.
Then very quickly brought in enough military force to maintain government control.
The lives of 5 or 6 protesters would have been a very small sacrifice paid for upholding America's image as a strong and secure democracy.
The Big Lie was concocted long before trump lost the election. Just saying it over and over and over does not make it true. There is NO evidence of the "massive voter fraud" that the Liar in Chief claims. The only real change that trump has created is the lack of confidence in our electoral system, particularly among the repub part. The repubs should have won the two seats in Georgia. trump screwed them over with his rhetoric. He has even admitted that.ZERO proof. ZERO.
To be fair, no democratic president prompted a riotous mob to storm the Capital because he lost an election.nothing could make usa hating democrats respectable
No different than all those thugs that suicided by cop in our urban hellholes, like that Floyd loser, or Michael Brown, or whichever thug was the flavor of the week when folks just needed a new big screen.The stupid bitch got shot attacking the capital. No one knew if she was armed or not so she got her silly ass blasted.
