Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet black unemployment has fallen to lowest levels in history under the organe hero. Why couldnt the brown buffoon do this? Oh yeah, he was too busy pushing his division and racisim.
Interesting..so your assumption..right off the bat...is that Trump would lie....and get caught...so he should assert Executive Privilege to avoid the "trap".Mueller wants to get him on a process crime.If he answers the questions , he needs to do it in person, not in writing.
He'll question him several times and then charge him with lying.
If I was Trump I'd claim Executive Privilege and tell him to go fuck himself.
And yet black unemployment has fallen to lowest levels in history under the organe hero. Why couldnt the brown buffoon do this? Oh yeah, he was too busy pushing his division and racisim.
eternal MORON.......
In November 2016 under Obama, the unemployment rate for blacks was 7.6%....
In November 2017 under Trump, the unemployment rate for blacks was 7.4%...
Do you "think" that blacks should erect an orange statue to your hero???....LOL
And yet black unemployment has fallen to lowest levels in history under the organe hero. Why couldnt the brown buffoon do this? Oh yeah, he was too busy pushing his division and racisim.
eternal MORON.......
In November 2016 under Obama, the unemployment rate for blacks was 7.6%....
In November 2017 under Trump, the unemployment rate for blacks was 7.4%...
Do you "think" that blacks should erect an orange statue to your hero???....LOL
Man, you really are dumb and ignorant. We're pulling for you though, bubba.
"The rate of job growth per month for blacks under Trump has so far been 40 percent higher than the monthly average under Obama. Trump has averaged nearly 30,000 new black jobs per month. That's especially remarkable because Obama was elected when employment was way down."
Man, you really are dumb and ignorant. We're pulling for you though, bubba.
"The rate of job growth per month for blacks under Trump has so far been 40 percent higher than the monthly average under Obama. Trump has averaged nearly 30,000 new black jobs per month. That's especially remarkable because Obama was elected when employment was way down."
Moron.....Trump has done NOTHING to help blacks and their unemployment rate.....He is riding on Obama's steady monthly improvement of employment....
Go play with yourself somewhere else. You're too fucking stupid to be posting your ignorance........LOL
(Your BrownNose is turning orangy......)
You're wrong again and you're mad and seething because O failed. We get it.
thanks for the thread's bump........Your ONLY worth on this forum.....LOL
I'm sure he thinks the presidency is a continuation of his wrestling career.I would pay to see Trump testify on pay per view
Which law are you speaking of?The President is NOT above the lawWith Trump in the WH, this may be the optimum time to finally settle the issue that was poorly addressed by our founding fathers. The question is a rather simple one, but with far-reaching repercussions in defining a social democratic republic:
Do we elect someone who is above the legal standards of all other citizens, or do we elect someone who is a temporary holder of a high executive position, subject to the same standards of any other?
In a monarchy, there has always been this myth that the position of royalty is a "divine disposition"(as Louis XIV asserted, l'etat est moi.) But our wise founding fathers revolted against such a form of government. Nonetheless, they did not precisely restrict the powers invested in a POTUS.
With the advent and ascendancy of a Trump, this issue has reached the point of better defining what the role of a president should be in upholding the tenets of a free democratic republic.
So, let Trump defy the subpoena and let BOTH the people's will and the courts' judicial opinions finally settle this issue. (we had a partial assertion on this issue in the SCOTUS ruling in Nixon v.U.S.)
He doesent have to per the constitution...he is the president and we have three separate branches of government
Trump lawyers anticipate Mueller interview request and want to limit its ...Which law are you speaking of?The President is NOT above the lawWith Trump in the WH, this may be the optimum time to finally settle the issue that was poorly addressed by our founding fathers. The question is a rather simple one, but with far-reaching repercussions in defining a social democratic republic:
Do we elect someone who is above the legal standards of all other citizens, or do we elect someone who is a temporary holder of a high executive position, subject to the same standards of any other?
In a monarchy, there has always been this myth that the position of royalty is a "divine disposition"(as Louis XIV asserted, l'etat est moi.) But our wise founding fathers revolted against such a form of government. Nonetheless, they did not precisely restrict the powers invested in a POTUS.
With the advent and ascendancy of a Trump, this issue has reached the point of better defining what the role of a president should be in upholding the tenets of a free democratic republic.
So, let Trump defy the subpoena and let BOTH the people's will and the courts' judicial opinions finally settle this issue. (we had a partial assertion on this issue in the SCOTUS ruling in Nixon v.U.S.)
He doesent have to per the constitution...he is the president and we have three separate branches of government
FYI, the president cannot be forced to testify.
Trumpcouldn't be forced to speak directly to Mueller or the FBI; he could only be compelled to testify before a grand jury.
trump would wet his pants interviewing with MuellerTrump refuses to commit to Mueller interview
1st prove a crime was ever committed warranting a Special Counsel Witch Hunt...er, Investigation!
Based on WHAT?The execution of Mary Queen of Scots settled this matter. No one, not even the government itself embodied in the person of the King or Queen, is above the law.
This is grade-school stuff, to the OP I get your point, but Trump will lose this battle all the same (which I understand is your hope).
I didn't qualify whether or not there are laws broken only that Trump is as culpable to their application as any private citizen.Based on WHAT?The execution of Mary Queen of Scots settled this matter. No one, not even the government itself embodied in the person of the King or Queen, is above the law.
This is grade-school stuff, to the OP I get your point, but Trump will lose this battle all the same (which I understand is your hope).
After a year Democrats can not even prove a crime was committed warranting an Investigation.
Trump refuses to commit to Mueller interview
The only way they can compel him to testify is if they have probable cause he committed a crime. They cannot do that at this time. They're trying to entrap him.Trump lawyers anticipate Mueller interview request and want to limit its ...Which law are you speaking of?The President is NOT above the lawWith Trump in the WH, this may be the optimum time to finally settle the issue that was poorly addressed by our founding fathers. The question is a rather simple one, but with far-reaching repercussions in defining a social democratic republic:
Do we elect someone who is above the legal standards of all other citizens, or do we elect someone who is a temporary holder of a high executive position, subject to the same standards of any other?
In a monarchy, there has always been this myth that the position of royalty is a "divine disposition"(as Louis XIV asserted, l'etat est moi.) But our wise founding fathers revolted against such a form of government. Nonetheless, they did not precisely restrict the powers invested in a POTUS.
With the advent and ascendancy of a Trump, this issue has reached the point of better defining what the role of a president should be in upholding the tenets of a free democratic republic.
So, let Trump defy the subpoena and let BOTH the people's will and the courts' judicial opinions finally settle this issue. (we had a partial assertion on this issue in the SCOTUS ruling in Nixon v.U.S.)
He doesent have to per the constitution...he is the president and we have three separate branches of government
FYI, the president cannot be forced to testify.
www.cnn.com/2018/01/08/politics/trump-lawyers-mueller-interview.../index.html
1 day ago - Lawyers for President Donald Trump are anticipating a request for the President to talk to special counsel Robert Mueller and are discussing how to define the parameters of any ... Trumpcouldn't be forced to speak directly to Mueller or the FBI; he could only be compelled to testify before a grand jury.
