Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. It won't because it makes a lot of money, even though it sucks. If it wasn't generating a lot of money, people thinking it is because it lean left because some people respond to trump or think it leans right because trump loves it, would not matter. As it is, it tries to accommodate both sides, and has no standards accept ROI.Twitter should ban the original poster but it won’t because Twitter leans left and is biased. Just sayin.Video was great, but did not go into political party, though. Just sayin.Any lie will do for democrats, the party of lies and misinformation.
Or anyone who works any customer service job. It's sad that a minimum wage Walmart cashier has more composure than your average cop.That bitch had a mouth her. What an asshole. A microcosm of what law enforcement faces on a daily basis in some places.
Nope. It leans very left.No. It won't because it makes a lot of money, even though it sucks. If it wasn't generating a lot of money, people thinking it is because it lean left because some people respond to trump or think it leans right because trump loves it, would not matter. As it is, it tries to accommodate both sides, and has no standards accept ROI.Twitter should ban the original poster but it won’t because Twitter leans left and is biased. Just sayin.Video was great, but did not go into political party, though. Just sayin.Any lie will do for democrats, the party of lies and misinformation.
LOL I guess you totally missed where the COPS noticed her BECAUSE she WAS driving and parked to avoid them?She REFUSED to provide ID, you get arrested for that when driving a car.Maybe he should have taken her keys and made her stay in the car while they impounded it.He asked her POLITELY 20 TIMES. How long was long enough to wait?I want to be very clear I think she handled this in a horrible way and her behavior is awful.
But I just think the cop could have done a few things to avoid yanking her out of the car.
My point being she didn't need to come out of the car. I've been stopped by the cops many times and never been asked to get out of the vehicle. He should have run the VIN, saw it was not reported stolen and then politely asked if she ever owned a 2003 Saturn.
For driving without insurance and improper plates? Yea. I mean had she handled this differently, explained the situation and had insurance, I'm pretty sure this would have ended far differently.
Wrong. 9th circuit disagrees:
Since she was NOT driving, she was a passenger. I've sat in the drivers seat of a parked car to try to diagnose a check engine light. I was not a driver at that time. She had a point about it being a parked car. It changes things.
LOL I guess you totally missed where the COPS noticed her BECAUSE she WAS driving and parked to avoid them?She REFUSED to provide ID, you get arrested for that when driving a car.Maybe he should have taken her keys and made her stay in the car while they impounded it.He asked her POLITELY 20 TIMES. How long was long enough to wait?I want to be very clear I think she handled this in a horrible way and her behavior is awful.
But I just think the cop could have done a few things to avoid yanking her out of the car.
My point being she didn't need to come out of the car. I've been stopped by the cops many times and never been asked to get out of the vehicle. He should have run the VIN, saw it was not reported stolen and then politely asked if she ever owned a 2003 Saturn.
For driving without insurance and improper plates? Yea. I mean had she handled this differently, explained the situation and had insurance, I'm pretty sure this would have ended far differently.
Wrong. 9th circuit disagrees:
Since she was NOT driving, she was a passenger. I've sat in the drivers seat of a parked car to try to diagnose a check engine light. I was not a driver at that time. She had a point about it being a parked car. It changes things.
Yea I saw it, but still, she was parked. Why why would they run her plates for pulling over?
Because she was acting suspicious. They noticed she pulled over because of them most likely, it is called good police work.LOL I guess you totally missed where the COPS noticed her BECAUSE she WAS driving and parked to avoid them?She REFUSED to provide ID, you get arrested for that when driving a car.Maybe he should have taken her keys and made her stay in the car while they impounded it.He asked her POLITELY 20 TIMES. How long was long enough to wait?I want to be very clear I think she handled this in a horrible way and her behavior is awful.
But I just think the cop could have done a few things to avoid yanking her out of the car.
My point being she didn't need to come out of the car. I've been stopped by the cops many times and never been asked to get out of the vehicle. He should have run the VIN, saw it was not reported stolen and then politely asked if she ever owned a 2003 Saturn.
For driving without insurance and improper plates? Yea. I mean had she handled this differently, explained the situation and had insurance, I'm pretty sure this would have ended far differently.
Wrong. 9th circuit disagrees:
Since she was NOT driving, she was a passenger. I've sat in the drivers seat of a parked car to try to diagnose a check engine light. I was not a driver at that time. She had a point about it being a parked car. It changes things.
Yea I saw it, but still, she was parked. Why why would they run her plates for pulling over?
Because she was acting suspicious. They noticed she pulled over because of them most likely, it is called good police work.LOL I guess you totally missed where the COPS noticed her BECAUSE she WAS driving and parked to avoid them?She REFUSED to provide ID, you get arrested for that when driving a car.Maybe he should have taken her keys and made her stay in the car while they impounded it.He asked her POLITELY 20 TIMES. How long was long enough to wait?I want to be very clear I think she handled this in a horrible way and her behavior is awful.
But I just think the cop could have done a few things to avoid yanking her out of the car.
My point being she didn't need to come out of the car. I've been stopped by the cops many times and never been asked to get out of the vehicle. He should have run the VIN, saw it was not reported stolen and then politely asked if she ever owned a 2003 Saturn.
For driving without insurance and improper plates? Yea. I mean had she handled this differently, explained the situation and had insurance, I'm pretty sure this would have ended far differently.
Wrong. 9th circuit disagrees:
Since she was NOT driving, she was a passenger. I've sat in the drivers seat of a parked car to try to diagnose a check engine light. I was not a driver at that time. She had a point about it being a parked car. It changes things.
Yea I saw it, but still, she was parked. Why why would they run her plates for pulling over?
Go away troll. You keep trying to make excuses for the inexcusable.Because she was acting suspicious. They noticed she pulled over because of them most likely, it is called good police work.LOL I guess you totally missed where the COPS noticed her BECAUSE she WAS driving and parked to avoid them?She REFUSED to provide ID, you get arrested for that when driving a car.Maybe he should have taken her keys and made her stay in the car while they impounded it.He asked her POLITELY 20 TIMES. How long was long enough to wait?I want to be very clear I think she handled this in a horrible way and her behavior is awful.
But I just think the cop could have done a few things to avoid yanking her out of the car.
My point being she didn't need to come out of the car. I've been stopped by the cops many times and never been asked to get out of the vehicle. He should have run the VIN, saw it was not reported stolen and then politely asked if she ever owned a 2003 Saturn.
For driving without insurance and improper plates? Yea. I mean had she handled this differently, explained the situation and had insurance, I'm pretty sure this would have ended far differently.
Wrong. 9th circuit disagrees:
Since she was NOT driving, she was a passenger. I've sat in the drivers seat of a parked car to try to diagnose a check engine light. I was not a driver at that time. She had a point about it being a parked car. It changes things.
Yea I saw it, but still, she was parked. Why why would they run her plates for pulling over?
Pulling your car to the side of the road is suspicious? ZOMG tell me it isn't so.
Because she was acting suspicious. They noticed she pulled over because of them most likely, it is called good police work.LOL I guess you totally missed where the COPS noticed her BECAUSE she WAS driving and parked to avoid them?She REFUSED to provide ID, you get arrested for that when driving a car.Maybe he should have taken her keys and made her stay in the car while they impounded it.He asked her POLITELY 20 TIMES. How long was long enough to wait?I want to be very clear I think she handled this in a horrible way and her behavior is awful.
But I just think the cop could have done a few things to avoid yanking her out of the car.
My point being she didn't need to come out of the car. I've been stopped by the cops many times and never been asked to get out of the vehicle. He should have run the VIN, saw it was not reported stolen and then politely asked if she ever owned a 2003 Saturn.
For driving without insurance and improper plates? Yea. I mean had she handled this differently, explained the situation and had insurance, I'm pretty sure this would have ended far differently.
Wrong. 9th circuit disagrees:
Since she was NOT driving, she was a passenger. I've sat in the drivers seat of a parked car to try to diagnose a check engine light. I was not a driver at that time. She had a point about it being a parked car. It changes things.
Yea I saw it, but still, she was parked. Why why would they run her plates for pulling over?
Pulling your car to the side of the road is suspicious? ZOMG tell me it isn't so.
