TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
- Mar 30, 2013
- 50,213
- 13,592
You proved nothing. Your only proof is "because I say so".
I proved everything.
Your denial blinds you, utterly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You proved nothing. Your only proof is "because I say so".
Go for it.This is amusing. I'll just keep this thread watched while you melt into pure and complete delirium.
Maybe you folks should stop making everything about race. That would lower the temp of the rhetoric and the trend toward radicalization on both/all sides?It isn't a cop out when your argument repeatedly returns to political parties (of which, by the way, I have none) and mine does not.
This particular issue is more accurately viewed in terms of radicalization. It isn't just ISIS any more who utilizes the internet to suck in vulnerable people. Multiple times we have seen killers form their extremist views from the internet, whether it's connecting with like minded, getting recruited into extremist ideologies, etc. You blame "the other side" for these extremists, because that is your own bias, but the truth is hatred of "the other", scapegoating, preying upon fears of cultural extinction to promote violence have been around for ever.
You think that is comparable to Jim Crowe?
Maybe you folks should stop making everything about race. That would lower the temp of the rhetoric and the trend toward radicalization on both/all sides?
What's wrong with just being Americans for a change?
The sentiment is the same, therefore comparable.You think that is comparableto Jim Crow?
Let me know when you’re ready to answer a simple question, coward.
Ah yes, pretending that you answered a question already instead of, oh I don’t know, just answering it.Are you too lazy to go through the quote chain? Seriously?
Alright. I guess that's too much to ask of a coward.
You do realize the KKK were conservatives right?Oh. We're going there.
White supremacists and the KKK consisted majorly of Democrats in their heyday. Neo-Nazism is a relatively recent invention.
But thanks for buttressing my position.
The rhetoric from the extremist left drove the extremist right to come up with the rhetoric that drove this kid to murder. Even history is on my side.
I proved everything.
Your denial blinds you, utterly.
It will of course never happen or they'd lose their biggest political cudgel.That would be an impressive step.
It would make me sit up and take notice.
No they weren't, they had little to nothing in common with the modern conservative movement that only began in earnest in the seventies and eighties.You do realize the KKK were conservatives right?
That is a hell of convoluted way of absolving both the extreme right and the killer.
Unreal.
View attachment 645230
When I stated my position in this thread, and presented the data (the links on CRT), you flatly dismissed them.
And thus, my point is made and my answer is final. Stop trying to save face by feigning ignorance. You will fail.
How hard is it for you to scroll through my responses?You do realize the KKK were conservatives right?
That is a hell of convoluted way of absolving both the extreme right and the killer.
Unreal.
View attachment 645230
Conservative Democrats, yes.You do realize the KKK were conservatives right?
That is a hell of convoluted way of absolving both the extreme right and the killer.
Unreal.
View attachment 645230
Because my response to your question are my responses to you. The links in particular you so readily dismissed.Ah yes, pretending that you answered a question already instead of, oh I don’t know, just answering it.
Your coward tactics aren’t working, sorry.
So, yes, says the jelly brained coward.Ah yes, pretending that you answered a question already instead of, oh I don’t know, just answering it.
Your coward tactics aren’t working, sorry.
Which means what exactly? That the southern dem branch was conservative at the time. The fact that they were rightwingers remains.Conservative Democrats, yes.
The fact they were Democrats however, remains.
Which means what exactly? That the southern dem branch was conservative at the time. The fact that they were rightwingers remains.
That didn't stop them from being Democrats. Nor does it stop it from being part of the party's political heritage.Which means what exactly? That the southern dem branch was conservative at the time. The fact that they were rightwingers remains.
Good grief. You really can't see it can you? Both sides? No. And you are still completely missing the point because all you can do is hammer down on the left over and over and over...I'm not falling for that.
I have taken sides on both ends of the spectrum, whereas you have taken only one. Consistently.
What drove the radicalism?
Radicalism from the other side.
It is a vicious cycle, one I place blame squarely on the left for in this circumstance.