Sheriff's department.How the hell do you know any of that? Were you there? Did you talk to him?He was walking in a manner that seemed deisgned to attract attention. He also edited his video to suggest something that wasnt there.No. When you distort what happened by saying "he was merely walking with his hands in his pockets" you commit an injustice against the truth. It's like saying Oswald was only out for some target practice. Or Nixon was merely taping something.We just have different viewpoints on this. Try to remember we're on the same side, friend.Wrong and wrong.
I guess I found out the answer to my question. The answer is No, you cannot represent things truthfully.
The truth is the guy was acting in a suspicious manner.
I agree with everything you've said up until this point.
It was intentional and he wanted to attract police attention to provoke an incident.
This part, on the other hand, is nothing more than your supposition. How do you know what his "intentions" were?
The video that was posted was an edited version of the whole situation and cut out the Deputy fully explaining as to why 911 was called on him, and ended with this person agreeing that the police should respond. The 911 call received by the Oakland County Dispatch Center originated from a nearby business that had been a victim , as well as its employees, of seven robberies. The caller and his employees were concerned about the individual who had walked by the front window of the business five or six times, while looking inside with his hands in his pockets. Fearing for their safety, the business dialed 911 and the Deputy responded.
In the unedited version of the event, the individual stated that if he had called the police on a suspicious person, he would expect the police to respond, check the area, and talk to the suspicious person being called about. The Deputy did not detain or pat down the individual and considering the nature of the call responded in a very restrained and professional manner.
]