POLL: Does the left want to end capitalism?

[bripat9643]

Yep. The screamingly obvious point of equilibrium here is effective and efficient regulation. But the libertarians controlling the GOP and the left wingers controlling the Dems have other ideas.
.

Mac, you need to learn what terms mean before tossing them about.

{
What is 'Economic Equilibrium '
Economic equilibrium is a condition or state in which economic forces are balanced. In effect, economic variables remain unchanged from their equilibrium values in the absence of external influences.

Economic equilibrium may also be defined as the point at which supply equals demand for a product, with the equilibrium price existing where the hypothetical supply and demand curves intersect.}

Economic Equilibrium

Just because you hear a term doesn't mean you should use it with no understanding of it's meaning.

Um, I didn't use the term "Economic Equilibrium".

Maybe read my post one more time.

Then you can try again.
.

Pathetic Mac.

Equilibrium is an economic term and concept, which you deployed in a discussion on economics.

Weaseling out of your obvious faux paus is unbecoming.

Under the Monarchy we paid 5% of our income in taxes. Under democracy we pay 50%. Taxation with representation is far worse than taxation without representation.

Under the Monarchy the serfs paid 100% of their income in taxes. They were the property of the land holders who were agents of the state. The Nobility under Henrey the VIII paid a rate of 75% of ll acquired estates to the king. Often the crown would confiscate the lands of an out of favor noble and grant them to a more favored noble. The new steward was then to remit 75% of the land back to the crown. In this way the crown stole land en masse, but maintained an aire of legality.

Serfdom was ended by the enclosure movement starting in the 17th century. So was Feudalism, which is the system that existed at the time of Henry VIII. By the 18th Century. Almost all land in Britain was privately owned. The common people either worked on their own farms, worked for someone else's private farm or worked in factories in the city. Feudal lords weren't able to confiscate their income.

The bottom line is that colonial Americans only paid about 5% of their income in taxes to the crown, and they went to war over that.

 

[edward37]

I'm a liberal that likes a healthy portion of socialism with my well regulated capitalism. That is the recipe that makes a vibrant middle class.

It does nothing of the sort. All it does is create a class of parasites. You will keep voting for more portions of socialism until there's no capitalism left. Ask a "liberal" how much socialism do they want and they will always say "more."

Bri what do you suggest we do with all these ""parasites"' Let them starve or give them a quick death??

I suggest all the caring left wingers can write them a check, or are you admitting you wouldn't lift a finger to help them?

Eddie Munster is willing to have the state rob his neighbor on behalf of "da po."

Eddie is a Communist, he firmly believes that charity begins in the pocket of your neighbor...

UN how come you're not at the WH with your people?

 

[bripat9643]

It's my opinion that the left wing is not an opponent of capitalism. What do you think?

That is a rather complicated question. For you see, you have the naïve moonbats of the Left who follow the demagogues of the Left.

Take the two socialists in American politics who are Bernie Sanders and the next Sarah Palin of politics, you know, Crazy eyes. (please don't make me spell her name)

Both say they are socialists but neither are advocating a complete government takeover of industry, which is the traditional definition of socialist. No, both just want to give a bunch more free stuff to people as they live a lavish lifestyle that the common man cannot.

Are they serious? Who knows? All I know is that they are dangerous.

The sad thing is many of the younger generation have no clue and just do the feel good follow along cause its hip.
They snack on tide pods while dancing next to moving cars ffs

In total 37 idiot teenagers ate Tide Pods. Right wingers judge an entire generation based on 37 kids out of an entire generation. But hey, it’s what you asshats do.

All liberals are commies. All Muslims want to kill you. All blacks hate white people. You find the most egregious examples of idiocy you can find and then paint everyone you don’t like in that light.

It’s not reality. Not even close.

All Republicans are racist, sexist, homophobic bigots who want to starve children and take us back to the 1950s. Who does that remind you of?

Trump when he was a Dem??

That point flew right over your head, dumbass.

 

[edward37]

Um, I didn't use the term "Economic Equilibrium".

Maybe read my post one more time.

Then you can try again.
.

Pathetic Mac.

Equilibrium is an economic term and concept, which you deployed in a discussion on economics.

Weaseling out of your obvious faux paus is unbecoming.

Under the Monarchy we paid 5% of our income in taxes. Under democracy we pay 50%. Taxation with representation is far worse than taxation without representation.

You pay 50%?? Get a new CPA

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
I give more than my share I'm not a republican anymore And if I had a fuk I wouldn't give it if you don't believe me

Since Republicans give about 95% of all charity in America, the fact that you are not a Republican would indicate you wouldn't give a nickle to a dying man to help him buy a crust of bread. You'll just demand the state rob your neighbor.

But Comrade, surely as a board leftist you make hundreds of millions of dollars every hour. You must live in a house the size of Iowa, with 80 or 90 thousand rooms. Why not just have the poor come stay with you?

I mean, since you're so rich and all...

 

[Wry Catcher]

The capitalist system provides us with a ruling class. The objective of the socialist system is to eliminate it.

That is astoundingly ignorant. That is the epitome of ignorant. First of all, capitalism does not create a “ruling class”. Everybody is completely free to do whatever the fuck they want - including starting their own business.

Secondly, socialism oppressed the people through an awful ruling class. It doesn’t seek to “eliminate” a ruling class. It seeks to control everything and everyone.

Capitalism destroys the ruling class. Free and unfettered markets are a ladder of success that any person with talent and ambition can climb. This threatens the position of the ruling elite, hence the fabrication of idiocy such as Marxism, which is just Monarchist rule repackaged to appeal to the stupid and lazy.


The point of Marxism is to destroy the bourgeoisie, the middle class of merchants and entrepreneurs, so as to destroy the path of economic freedom and put the yolk of serfdom back on the masses. The goal is to protect the wealth, power, and position of the ruling elite from the usurpers who climb above their station.

Marx was a student of Hegel, Hegelian thought revolves around, in fact is consumed with the desire to restore the Monarchy and roll back the enlightenment. Hegel termed absolute and unquestioning obedience to the crown, or state, to be an "ethical life." Liberty in any form, questioning of the absolute rule of the monarchy or state was therefor immoral and unethical.

Wow. Did Trump study "Hegelian thought"? Demanding loyalty and making laws via EO's and "justice", i.e. "lock her up, seems to be a good fit with your last paragraph.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Mac, you need to learn what terms mean before tossing them about.

{
What is 'Economic Equilibrium '
Economic equilibrium is a condition or state in which economic forces are balanced. In effect, economic variables remain unchanged from their equilibrium values in the absence of external influences.

Economic equilibrium may also be defined as the point at which supply equals demand for a product, with the equilibrium price existing where the hypothetical supply and demand curves intersect.}

Economic Equilibrium

Just because you hear a term doesn't mean you should use it with no understanding of it's meaning.

Um, I didn't use the term "Economic Equilibrium".

Maybe read my post one more time.

Then you can try again.
.

Pathetic Mac.

Equilibrium is an economic term and concept, which you deployed in a discussion on economics.

Weaseling out of your obvious faux paus is unbecoming.

Under the Monarchy we paid 5% of our income in taxes. Under democracy we pay 50%. Taxation with representation is far worse than taxation without representation.

Under the Monarchy the serfs paid 100% of their income in taxes. They were the property of the land holders who were agents of the state. The Nobility under Henrey the VIII paid a rate of 75% of ll acquired estates to the king. Often the crown would confiscate the lands of an out of favor noble and grant them to a more favored noble. The new steward was then to remit 75% of the land back to the crown. In this way the crown stole land en masse, but maintained an aire of legality.

Serfdom was ended by the enclosure movement starting in the 17th century. So was Feudalism, which is the system that existed at the time of Henry VIII. By the 18th Century. Almost all land in Britain was privately owned. The common people either worked on their own farms, worked for someone else's private farm or worked in factories in the city. Feudal lords weren't able to confiscate their income.

The bottom line is that colonial Americans only paid about 5% of their income in taxes to the crown, and they went to war over that.

Yes, the renaissance altered the division of assets and labor in England. This is why the Marxists exist, they seek to reverse the renaissance and return to feudalism.

 

[edward37]

[
I give more than my share I'm not a republican anymore And if I had a fuk I wouldn't give it if you don't believe me

Since Republicans give about 95% of all charity in America, the fact that you are not a Republican would indicate you wouldn't give a nickle to a dying man to help him buy a crust of bread. You'll just demand the state rob your neighbor.

But Comrade, surely as a board leftist you make hundreds of millions of dollars every hour. You must live in a house the size of Iowa, with 80 or 90 thousand rooms. Why not just have the poor come stay with you?

I mean, since you're so rich and all...

The only truth to your post is I am on the left Everything else is exaggerated by a sick republican mind

 

[kaz]

The capitalist system provides us with a ruling class. The objective of the socialist system is to eliminate it.

That is astoundingly ignorant. That is the epitome of ignorant. First of all, capitalism does not create a “ruling class”. Everybody is completely free to do whatever the fuck they want - including starting their own business.

Secondly, socialism oppressed the people through an awful ruling class. It doesn’t seek to “eliminate” a ruling class. It seeks to control everything and everyone.

Capitalism destroys the ruling class. Free and unfettered markets are a ladder of success that any person with talent and ambition can climb. This threatens the position of the ruling elite, hence the fabrication of idiocy such as Marxism, which is just Monarchist rule repackaged to appeal to the stupid and lazy.


The point of Marxism is to destroy the bourgeoisie, the middle class of merchants and entrepreneurs, so as to destroy the path of economic freedom and put the yolk of serfdom back on the masses. The goal is to protect the wealth, power, and position of the ruling elite from the usurpers who climb above their station.

Marx was a student of Hegel, Hegelian thought revolves around, in fact is consumed with the desire to restore the Monarchy and roll back the enlightenment. Hegel termed absolute and unquestioning obedience to the crown, or state, to be an "ethical life." Liberty in any form, questioning of the absolute rule of the monarchy or state was therefor immoral and unethical.

Wow. Did Trump study "Hegelian thought"? Demanding loyalty and making laws via EO's and "justice", i.e. "lock her up, seems to be a good fit with your last paragraph.

Trump's EOs undid laws made up by Obama. Don't let facts get in the way of a good rant though. Don't let that you're another leftist who doesn't know how to use quote marks get in the way either

 

[Uncensored2008]

Pathetic Mac.

Equilibrium is an economic term and concept, which you deployed in a discussion on economics.

Weaseling out of your obvious faux paus is unbecoming.

Under the Monarchy we paid 5% of our income in taxes. Under democracy we pay 50%. Taxation with representation is far worse than taxation without representation.

You pay 50%?? Get a new CPA

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

 

[edward37]

Under the Monarchy we paid 5% of our income in taxes. Under democracy we pay 50%. Taxation with representation is far worse than taxation without representation.

You pay 50%?? Get a new CPA

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

That wasn't trump releasing his only return where he paid???

 

[Uncensored2008]

The capitalist system provides us with a ruling class. The objective of the socialist system is to eliminate it.

That is astoundingly ignorant. That is the epitome of ignorant. First of all, capitalism does not create a “ruling class”. Everybody is completely free to do whatever the fuck they want - including starting their own business.

Secondly, socialism oppressed the people through an awful ruling class. It doesn’t seek to “eliminate” a ruling class. It seeks to control everything and everyone.

Capitalism destroys the ruling class. Free and unfettered markets are a ladder of success that any person with talent and ambition can climb. This threatens the position of the ruling elite, hence the fabrication of idiocy such as Marxism, which is just Monarchist rule repackaged to appeal to the stupid and lazy.


The point of Marxism is to destroy the bourgeoisie, the middle class of merchants and entrepreneurs, so as to destroy the path of economic freedom and put the yolk of serfdom back on the masses. The goal is to protect the wealth, power, and position of the ruling elite from the usurpers who climb above their station.

Marx was a student of Hegel, Hegelian thought revolves around, in fact is consumed with the desire to restore the Monarchy and roll back the enlightenment. Hegel termed absolute and unquestioning obedience to the crown, or state, to be an "ethical life." Liberty in any form, questioning of the absolute rule of the monarchy or state was therefor immoral and unethical.

Wow. Did Trump study "Hegelian thought"? Demanding loyalty and making laws via EO's and "justice", i.e. "lock her up, seems to be a good fit with your last paragraph.

No idea, dullard.

Oh, and you fucking liar, Obama used EO's at 7 times the frequency that Trump does. Further, the main use of EO's by Trump is to roll back the illegal acts of your god-emperor.

Here's how many executive orders Trump signed in his first 200 days compared to Obama, Bush, and Clinton
Chart: Donald Trump's first 12 days of executive orders
.

 

[edward37]

Under the Monarchy we paid 5% of our income in taxes. Under democracy we pay 50%. Taxation with representation is far worse than taxation without representation.

You pay 50%?? Get a new CPA

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

Trump’s return demonstrates why preserving the A.M.T. is essential. More immediately, it also raises the question of who leaked it. During Maddow’s show, Johnston suggested that the documents could possibly have come from Trump himself, or someone acting at his direction. "With Donald, you never know," he said. Obviously, this is just speculation, but there are a number of reasons why the theory that someone connected to Trump may have been the leaker is far from implausible.

For one thing, the leak didn't include the bulk of Trump's tax return or the supporting appendices. These materials would have provided information about any loans he had taken out and details of any income he received from overseas. It is also curious that the return is for 2005, which was a particularly good year for Trump's business. He "sold two properties, one on Manhattan’s west side and one in San Francisco, to Hong Kong investors," a report at the Daily Beast pointed out.

 

[FA_Q2]

Is this really in question anymore?

Every rising star on the left that generates any real excitement is an open socialist. Clearly they want an end to capitalism.

 

[Uncensored2008]

You pay 50%?? Get a new CPA

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

That wasn't trump releasing his only return where he paid???

????

What lie are you attempting to get away with?

Trump didn't release anything. Obama illegally leaked Trump's tax return in an attempt to corrupt the presidential election.

Donald Trump's tax returns leaked, reveals he DID pay tax | Daily Mail Online

The Obama regime was furiously rigging the election, this was just one small act. They also climbed in bed with Moscow to get a fabricated dossier that Obama's FSB used as the basis for a perjured FISA warrant so they could spy on the opposition candidate and try to find ways to stage a coup.

 

[kaz]

You pay 50%?? Get a new CPA

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

Trump’s return demonstrates why preserving the A.M.T. is essential. More immediately, it also raises the question of who leaked it. During Maddow’s show, Johnston suggested that the documents could possibly have come from Trump himself, or someone acting at his direction. "With Donald, you never know," he said. Obviously, this is just speculation, but there are a number of reasons why the theory that someone connected to Trump may have been the leaker is far from implausible.

For one thing, the leak didn't include the bulk of Trump's tax return or the supporting appendices. These materials would have provided information about any loans he had taken out and details of any income he received from overseas. It is also curious that the return is for 2005, which was a particularly good year for Trump's business. He "sold two properties, one on Manhattan’s west side and one in San Francisco, to Hong Kong investors," a report at the Daily Beast pointed out.

Trump paying $38 million wasn't enough for you, comrade? How much should he have paid?

 

[edward37]

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

That wasn't trump releasing his only return where he paid???

????

What lie are you attempting to get away with?

Trump didn't release anything. Obama illegally leaked Trump's tax return in an attempt to corrupt the presidential election.

Donald Trump's tax returns leaked, reveals he DID pay tax | Daily Mail Online

The Obama regime was furiously rigging the election, this was just one small act. They also climbed in bed with Moscow to get a fabricated dossier that Obama's FSB used as the basis for a perjured FISA warrant so they could spy on the opposition candidate and try to find ways to stage a coup.

Trump didn't release anything ?? lol and he never called a radio station making believe he was some one else and pigs fly?

 

[edward37]

Your boy trump is like crime ,,,he doesn't pay

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

Trump’s return demonstrates why preserving the A.M.T. is essential. More immediately, it also raises the question of who leaked it. During Maddow’s show, Johnston suggested that the documents could possibly have come from Trump himself, or someone acting at his direction. "With Donald, you never know," he said. Obviously, this is just speculation, but there are a number of reasons why the theory that someone connected to Trump may have been the leaker is far from implausible.

For one thing, the leak didn't include the bulk of Trump's tax return or the supporting appendices. These materials would have provided information about any loans he had taken out and details of any income he received from overseas. It is also curious that the return is for 2005, which was a particularly good year for Trump's business. He "sold two properties, one on Manhattan’s west side and one in San Francisco, to Hong Kong investors," a report at the Daily Beast pointed out.

Trump paying $38 million wasn't enough for you, comrade? How much should he have paid?

what about the other 20 or so years .....?

 

[kaz]

Doesn't pay what, fucking liar?

When Obama released Trump's tax returns as part of the government plot to rig the election, we found that Trump pays MILLIONS in taxes.

{In 2005, Donald Trump paid $38 million -- or about 25.3 percent -- in taxes on income of over $150 million, }

Donald Trump tax returns - portion of 2005 form 1040 released

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

Trump’s return demonstrates why preserving the A.M.T. is essential. More immediately, it also raises the question of who leaked it. During Maddow’s show, Johnston suggested that the documents could possibly have come from Trump himself, or someone acting at his direction. "With Donald, you never know," he said. Obviously, this is just speculation, but there are a number of reasons why the theory that someone connected to Trump may have been the leaker is far from implausible.

For one thing, the leak didn't include the bulk of Trump's tax return or the supporting appendices. These materials would have provided information about any loans he had taken out and details of any income he received from overseas. It is also curious that the return is for 2005, which was a particularly good year for Trump's business. He "sold two properties, one on Manhattan’s west side and one in San Francisco, to Hong Kong investors," a report at the Daily Beast pointed out.

Trump paying $38 million wasn't enough for you, comrade? How much should he have paid?

what about the other 20 or so years .....?

What about them?

 

[edward37]

That was ONE Think he got a refund the following year ?

No you don't, you're just lying.

Obama illegally released the 2005 return to try and corrupt the election. He did not illegally release further returns. Maybe the risk of his treason was too great? Why is Lois Lerner not in prison for that? Releasing the taxes of the opposition candidate for President? Yet she remains free and walking around? Where the fuck is the Grand Inquisitor? You want election tampering? There it is - no way to refute it.

Trump’s return demonstrates why preserving the A.M.T. is essential. More immediately, it also raises the question of who leaked it. During Maddow’s show, Johnston suggested that the documents could possibly have come from Trump himself, or someone acting at his direction. "With Donald, you never know," he said. Obviously, this is just speculation, but there are a number of reasons why the theory that someone connected to Trump may have been the leaker is far from implausible.

For one thing, the leak didn't include the bulk of Trump's tax return or the supporting appendices. These materials would have provided information about any loans he had taken out and details of any income he received from overseas. It is also curious that the return is for 2005, which was a particularly good year for Trump's business. He "sold two properties, one on Manhattan’s west side and one in San Francisco, to Hong Kong investors," a report at the Daily Beast pointed out.

Trump paying $38 million wasn't enough for you, comrade? How much should he have paid?

what about the other 20 or so years .....?

What about them?

Why hide them after showing the ONE where he paid ,,, that still left out much info?