Mac1958
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #81
You'd think, but everyone is afraid they won't get re-elected and lose their cushy gubmit job.That's my point, the party is too divided to effectively govern.They may not be monolithic, but it's time to govern now. If they can't do anything about something as big as the ACA, that sure isn't a good sign.We were promised for eight (8) years the the GOP had the alternative to the ACA, if we'd only just elect them.
Well, they now have control of the White House, the House, the Senate and State Houses, and it's my understanding that the current Dog Catcher population is primarily GOP as well.
First, as we know, it turns out they never had a plan.
Second, as we know, the "plan" they're trying to roll out is not Repeal & Replace, it's Tweak. That's the best they can do, tweak.
Third, it's 50/50 at best that this "plan" will make it to the President's desk, since the party can't seem to bring its disparate factions together on a deal.
What does the above say about the GOP?
.
It says the GOP is not monolithic like the Dims.
.
Oh please!
You have Collins and her gang that are RINOs on social issues, and you have the Rand Paul and his gang that will not spend a dime on any social issues, and you have the same setup in the House. There are plenty of Republicans in the middle, but not enough to win out over Dims obstruction. If 50 votes are required, that gives you room enough for 1 to vote no because they want to repeal, 1 to vote no because they want to replace, and any more in either category means it will not fly!
Trying to get those disparate factions to agree will be a feat for political historians to talk about for centuries.
.
No. They can govern, but somebody has got to give in.
.