Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Denial. Not a river in Egypt.You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?
You poor thing.
too bad they did nothing of the sort.
You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
Denial. Not a river in Egypt.You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?
You poor thing.
too bad they did nothing of the sort.
We have emails from her to Chelsea saying it was a terrorist attack.
We have her public statements saying it was not a terrorist attack.
Only one can be true. Did she lie to Chelsea or did she lie to the American people?
Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
LOL!!! Deep in denial, stuck on stupid, posing poseur. Your life must suck.You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
they presented nothin, you poor demented loser.
Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
True, she is not the target of the fbi investigation, I read they are investigating whether the current state dept are releasing her emails properly for the FOIA REQUESTS, with redaction on emails that were LATER deemed classified...Are you saying that the FBI is investigating Hillary without probable cause?
Pretty much. also they've said she iisn't a target, but don't worry, this will blow up on your face, too.
And the State dept and fbi are duking out what is classified and what is not. The State dept has final say on classification.
LOL!!! Deep in denial, stuck on stupid, posing poseur. Your life must suck.You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
they presented nothin, you poor demented loser.
LOL PLease show where she retracted her view it was a terrorist attack. She knew it was. SHe had been told by the Libyans and the Egyptians it was.Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
he hasn't had a rational thought in years
True, she is not the target of the fbi investigation, I read they are investigating whether the current state dept are releasing her emails properly for the FOIA REQUESTS, with redaction on emails that were LATER deemed classified...Are you saying that the FBI is investigating Hillary without probable cause?
Pretty much. also they've said she iisn't a target, but don't worry, this will blow up on your face, too.
And the State dept and fbi are duking out what is classified and what is not. The State dept has final say on classification.
This is why Clinton releasing classified information is a joke. It is her dept which says if it is classified or not.
The big thing we have learnt about these emails is how dysfunctional the classified / non classified works.
Clinton could release the name of every agent in the CIA and she still would have not broken the law. A lot of agents would die but it would not be illegal.
It turns out that CIA and State Dept has been having bun fights for decades...
So scooter Libby was innocent?True, she is not the target of the fbi investigation, I read they are investigating whether the current state dept are releasing her emails properly for the FOIA REQUESTS, with redaction on emails that were LATER deemed classified...Are you saying that the FBI is investigating Hillary without probable cause?
Pretty much. also they've said she iisn't a target, but don't worry, this will blow up on your face, too.
And the State dept and fbi are duking out what is classified and what is not. The State dept has final say on classification.
This is why Clinton releasing classified information is a joke. It is her dept which says if it is classified or not.
The big thing we have learnt about these emails is how dysfunctional the classified / non classified works.
Clinton could release the name of every agent in the CIA and she still would have not broken the law. A lot of agents would die but it would not be illegal.
It turns out that CIA and State Dept has been having bun fights for decades...
NOPE, not lying, you just did not watch the hearing and are uninformed on the other hearings on this....Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
Of course she did. She sent classified intel to Sidney Blumenthal and many others on a non secure server. This isnt even in debate. Even she doesnt deny that. What she says is "it wasnt marked classified" which is true but irrelevant.True, she is not the target of the fbi investigation, I read they are investigating whether the current state dept are releasing her emails properly for the FOIA REQUESTS, with redaction on emails that were LATER deemed classified...Are you saying that the FBI is investigating Hillary without probable cause?
Pretty much. also they've said she iisn't a target, but don't worry, this will blow up on your face, too.
And the State dept and fbi are duking out what is classified and what is not. The State dept has final say on classification.
This is why Clinton releasing classified information is a joke. It is her dept which says if it is classified or not.
The big thing we have learnt about these emails is how dysfunctional the classified / non classified works.
Clinton could release the name of every agent in the CIA and she still would have not broken the law. A lot of agents would die but it would not be illegal.
It turns out that CIA and State Dept has been having bun fights for decades...
she didn't "release" classified information.
that would be the committee which outed a CIA agent.
poor dears.
The buck will forever stop at her desk.
LOL PLease show where she retracted her view it was a terrorist attack. She knew it was. SHe had been told by the Libyans and the Egyptians it was.Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
he hasn't had a rational thought in years
Making shit up is what gets you ignored.
Everyone who doesn't live under a rock knows they tried to cover it up with a Lie...............The video did it.............
At the same time, the investigation after investigation wasn't going to lead to any dang thing........
Now Hillary can play the innocent VICTIM STATUS............how they didn't lie.............
Politically, it was stupid to continue this, knowing the DOJ and current administration would do a dang thing for the violations of email protocol....................................
Were they a failure before and after Benghazi..........You Betcha....................Did they attempt a cover up.........aka a Lie.......Darn Right You Betcha........................will the extra investigations do a dang thing about it..............Nope.
Hillary Triumphant dudeOf course she did. She sent classified intel to Sidney Blumenthal and many others on a non secure server. This isnt even in debate. Even she doesnt deny that. What she says is "it wasnt marked classified" which is true but irrelevant.
Your surrender here is noted. You have some floor to sweep or ashtray to empty? Go at it. Spare the rest ofus your stupidity and snark.LOL PLease show where she retracted her view it was a terrorist attack. She knew it was. SHe had been told by the Libyans and the Egyptians it was.Your dreaming, or living in this right wing propaganda bubble....You dont think presenting proof Hillary lied about the incident to the American people is nailing her?I'm kind of curious as to who is so delusional that they think the GOP "nailed" Hillary or benefitted from the so-called "hearings"
You poor thing.
They provided no proof, what so ever that she lied about the attack, none, zero, zip.
A terrorist wannabe al-Qaeda group took credit for the attack, she talked to Chelsea, the following day, this terrorist group reneged, retracted their responsibility for the attack....the admin also received 21 action reports from various Intelligence agencies that attributed the incident to the video.
It was changing by the minute, fluid.....
No one lied.
he hasn't had a rational thought in years
Making shit up is what gets you ignored.
sorry imbecile... there's no discussion to be had on this subject.
you're simply delusional and misogynist and pathetic.
but that's nothing new.
and now i have to get to work. you know, something you don't do.
