the text of 14th section 3 says engaged in, or give aid or comfort to the insurrectionists.
But who determined it was an insurrection? The cotus didn’t determine it, it just says what the penalties are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the text of 14th section 3 says engaged in, or give aid or comfort to the insurrectionists.
The fact that some WERE charged with crimes doesn't make what I said untrue. Many former confederates were not charged. But they were still banned from public office under the 14th amendment.That’s not necessarily true. Jefferson Davis was going to go on trial for treason, and there were 37 other indictments that were dropped at the time Davis was deemed not to go to trial.
All other non indicted civil war conspirators were pardoned…..pardoned from what? If there were never going to be any charges, then pardons wouldn’t be necessary.
So, if no charge is necessary, then what are you going to use to remove him from the ballot?
Maybe…again, many of them were pardoned by the president. Had he not done that, who knows how many would have been charged.The fact that some WERE charged with crimes doesn't make what I said untrue. Many former confederates were not charged. But they were still banned from public office under the 14th amendment.
Sure glad we don't depend on you to determine a person's guilt in the US. That is clearly addressed in the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments concerning DUE PROCESS. There has been none.
Except Trump wasn't engaged in the civil war either.The fact that some WERE charged with crimes doesn't make what I said untrue. Many former confederates were not charged. But they were still banned from public office under the 14th amendment.
does somebody born in another country have due process for not being qualified to be on ballot for president? I think not.Sure glad we don't depend on you to determine a person's guilt in the US. That is clearly addressed in the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendments concerning DUE PROCESS. There has been none.
Being born out of the country is not a crime--participating in an insurrection is.does somebody born in another country have due process for not being qualified to be on ballot for president? I think not.
8 judges so far.Who said trump committed insurrection?
The fact that they were removed without criminal charges means criminal charges were not required. That's how legal precedent works. The President gave a blanket pardon against charges arising from the rebellion but former confederates were still barred from holding federal offices.Maybe…again, many of them were pardoned by the president. Had he not done that, who knows how many would have been charged.
The fact that they weren’t charged doesn’t mean it’s not required, it just means there was no need after the pardon.
We have different courts to decide different issues you dumb Bingo. You don't need a criminal trial to determine whether someone is disqualified from being on a ballot.Zero juries.
Zero charges for insurrection.
Banana Republic.
Zero ethicsZero juries.
Zero charges for insurrection.
Banana Republic.
The fact that some WERE charged with crimes doesn't make what I said untrue. Many former confederates were not charged. But they were still banned from public office under the 14th amendment.
If you are using the 14th the only entity who has enforcement power is Congress, Simp.We have different courts to decide different issues you dumb Bingo. You don't need a criminal trial to determine whether someone is disqualified from being on a ballot.
Can only Congress enforce article 2 section 1? Because States disqualify people from presidential ballots all the time.If you are using the 14th the only entity who has enforcement power is Congress, Simp.
Insurrection is act you fucking moron. That action can be prosecuted as a crime it can also disqualify you from being President.Insurrection is a federal crime, not a state civil court matter.
Can only Congress enforce article 2 section 1? Because States disqualify people from presidential ballots all the time.
Insurrection is act you fucking moron. That action can be prosecuted as a crime it can also disqualify you from being President.
Yes there were. But that is Irrelevant. The wording of the amendment itself is all that matters. The fourteenth amendment does not specify the act of congress or the president is required. Nor does it specify that only the federal government has the authority to enforce the fourteenth amendment. In fact there is no enforcement mechanism in the fourteenth amendment at all. Technically, it could be argued that enforcement of the fourteenth amendment falls under the tenth amendment, Because federal authority over the matter is not specified.There were congressional acts and Presidential proclamations that the Confederates were insurrectionists.
Have you ever read the fourteenth amendment because it doesn't say that. In fact it doesn't say anything about who has the authority two enforce it.Congress is the only entity given enforcement power for the 14th, Simp.
1. Says who?Congress is the only entity given enforcement power for the 14th, Simp.