Poll: Who has enforcement authority of the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution?

Who does the 14th specify as having the authority to enforce the 14th?

  • Congress

    Votes: 27 93.1%
  • The Maine SOS

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • A civil court judge in Colorado.

    Votes: 2 6.9%

  • Total voters
    29
Hmm 🤔

You're fighting over the wording in the 14th, and you all continually mouth froth over the wording in the 2nd. Sounds like the constitution is not put together very well. Maybe Congress should start again and write a legible up-to-date version.
 
Hmm 🤔

You're fighting over the wording in the 14th, and you all continually mouth froth over the wording in the 2nd. Sounds like the constitution is not put together very well. Maybe Congress should start again and write a legible up-to-date version.
No the issue is coming from the leftists. They are falsely reinventing uses that never was intended.
The 14th amendment was created to control states. It wasn't written to give states authority.
As far as the second amendment goes. The words speak for themselves. And the federal government national guard doesn't have a second amendment right.
 
No the issue is coming from the leftists. They are falsely reinventing uses that never was intended.
The 14th amendment was created to control states. It wasn't written to give states authority.
As far as the second amendment goes. The words speak for themselves. And the federal government national guard doesn't have a second amendment right.
But the problem is, the Lefties and Righties have different opinions on the wording, and the Lefties argue the wording amongst themselves, and the Righties argue the wording amongst themselves, and then both argue the wording between themselves. There's no coherent constitution, it's fucked up.
 
But the problem is, the Lefties and Righties have different opinions on the wording, and the Lefties argue the wording amongst themselves, and the Righties argue the wording amongst themselves, and then both argue the wording between themselves. There's no coherent constitution, it's fucked up.
The only people having issues with the wording are leftists.
The 14 th amendment was created to reign in the states. It gives no authority or control to the states.
And the second amendment speaks for itself. Government doesn't have a second amendment right
 
The only people having issues with the wording are leftists.
The 14 th amendment was created to reign in the states. It gives no authority or control to the states.
And the second amendment speaks for itself. Government doesn't have a second amendment right
Of course it doesn't give control to the states because The Land of the Free marketing slogan is bollox.
 
There seems to be some confusion on this, so I will post the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution in it's entirety so all can read from beginning to end to find the answer. I will include a link so I can't be accused of altering the text.




Fourteenth Amendment​

Fourteenth Amendment Explained


Section 1​



All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.



Section 2​



Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice-President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.



Section 3​



No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.



Section 4​



The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.



Section 5​



The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.




BOOM!

The Supreme Court just ruled UNANIMOUSLY that Nostra is a genius.

:dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance::dance:
 
This unanimous ruling applies to all the rogue Dimtard states. Trump will be on all 50 ballots
:dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:
 
All 8 of those hacks just got bitchslapped by a unanimous Supreme Court Curried Goats

:dance: :dance: :dance:
Ok. And? When court rulings don't go the way I think they should you won't find me here crying about the deep state or Biden using the courts to persecute their political opponents. The courts rule and the Supreme Court is the final say. The only people who can't accept that when they lose is you lot. :dunno:
 
Ok. And? When court rulings don't go the way I think they should you won't find me here crying about the deep state or Biden using the courts to persecute their political opponents. The courts rule and the Supreme Court is the final say. The only people who can't accept that when they lose is you lot. :dunno:
Here's that crow that you were promised. Bon apetit!
 
Here's that crow that you were promised. Bon apetit!
I was wrong. But to put this into perspective, what I was wrong about was how much legal and political jeopardy your candidate was in. He's in slightly less political jeopardy at the moment but still very much in legal jeopardy. I guess that constitutes some sort of win for the GOP so..... congratulations? :dunno::lmao:
 
So Section 3 states that Congress can re-instate those that have been judged to be insurrectionists by (what you call idiot) civil courts that have ruled them ineligible.

No need for that of Congress has sole authority

Boom
Do you ever get tired of being wrong Lesh
 

Forum List

Back
Top