Poll: Who's going to win the election?

The way things stand now, who do you think will win the the election?

  • Trump

  • Hillary

  • Other


Results are only viewable after voting.
MP ignores that the Red States have the highest welfare rates in the nation. We could have all the money we need if we would cut back on the military-industrial complex we support.

BTM, I read it or heard 1 of 4 last week. Let me do some digging, but I believe it based on what I am hearing in west Texas and Salt Lake City among Republican women. They don't like Hillary but Trump's comments about women horrify many of them.
 
interesting that you put it that way.
Had you been talking about hillary, you would have said she had 75% support from white women.
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™

57% of people think Hillary won debate, 30% Trump, 13% unsure

If Donnie keeps dissing on and pissing off women, Clinton will win handily.
I sure hope so. She's up and he's down. We need that trend to stay just like that till election day.
What exactly is it that causes people like you to want to see this country fail?
Why would you want to destroy something that has worked for so many years for so many.
Fail? Clinton won't make it fail. Like her husband we'll see it start rolling again, even beyond Obama. And neither Clinton nor anyone else, especially someone like Trump, can fix its underlying ills. For that you need to start a new nation, something that should have been done long ago. Three nations would be good and we can let you idiots go off and starve and poison yourselves until you learn what you refuse to learn from us and from history.
you couldnt survive without us. We are the ones that pay the tax that is then rerouted to the welfare system for you to suck off of.
We would take with us the majority of jobs, the majority of workers, industry food.
You would end up with a majority looking to be cared for by others.
Clinton is not going to make the country stronger by increasing social welfare. What we need is someone that is willing to cut back on social expenses, cut back on foreign aide, reduce business taxes and stimulate the economy instead. The government is not able to produce revenue, corporations create revenue. The soon you and yours understand that and realize where the money comes from, the sooner we start recovery.
Clinton will move us closer to one of the failing third world countries that the U.S used to help.

You pay the tax? Did you miss the debate? Comrade Trump pays NO TAX cause he is "smart." Try again...,
 
MP ignores that the Red States have the highest welfare rates in the nation. We could have all the money we need if we would cut back on the military-industrial complex we support.

BTM, I read it or heard 1 of 4 last week. Let me do some digging, but I believe it based on what I am hearing in west Texas and Salt Lake City among Republican women. They don't like Hillary but Trump's comments about women horrify many of them.
now lets look at where that welfare goes. to the cities in those red states that produce a high democrat vote.
Do you think the red parts of that red state would rather not pay for the democrats?
Why do you think the welfare scum find their ways to the red states. Its because there is more money in the government for social services. To refuse services would create human rights lawsuits.
 
Hillary will win, Trump cant even get republicans to support him
I was interested in Hill's speech in NH today. Here's a picture.
Fleischer: Clinton running to Sanders isn't genuine

There probably 100+ people. Last night's Trump rally had 9,000 and left 6,500 outside, according to police.

So, you say Trump can't get Republicans to support him? LMAO

It is really interesting the throngs of people who show up at the clown's rallies compared to the relatively few who come to listen to the bulldyke cackle. It appears that his supporters are more zealous, and hers will say they are going to vote for her, but she certainly does not inspire them.

Or is something amok in the polling data? Could there be a huge November surprise? I don't know, but the rallies don't match the polls.

On the other hand, Obama drew large crowds in areas where he did not do well in actually voting.

How Do Trump Crowd Sizes Really Compare to Obama’s 2008 Crowds?

Just as Trump has drawn big crowds in Democratic states, Obama got 20,000 for a rally in Austin in September 2007 in the lead up to the Democratic primary, which he lost to Hillary Clinton. He also lost the state to 2008 Republican nominee John McCain in the general election. In December 2007, Obama drew 29,000 at a Columbia, South Carolina, rally. He won the state’s Democratic primary but lost in the general.

Apparently crowd size at rallies is not a great indicator of election results.
 
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™

57% of people think Hillary won debate, 30% Trump, 13% unsure

If Donnie keeps dissing on and pissing off women, Clinton will win handily.
I sure hope so. She's up and he's down. We need that trend to stay just like that till election day.
What exactly is it that causes people like you to want to see this country fail?
Why would you want to destroy something that has worked for so many years for so many.
Fail? Clinton won't make it fail. Like her husband we'll see it start rolling again, even beyond Obama. And neither Clinton nor anyone else, especially someone like Trump, can fix its underlying ills. For that you need to start a new nation, something that should have been done long ago. Three nations would be good and we can let you idiots go off and starve and poison yourselves until you learn what you refuse to learn from us and from history.
you couldnt survive without us. We are the ones that pay the tax that is then rerouted to the welfare system for you to suck off of.
We would take with us the majority of jobs, the majority of workers, industry food.
You would end up with a majority looking to be cared for by others.
Clinton is not going to make the country stronger by increasing social welfare. What we need is someone that is willing to cut back on social expenses, cut back on foreign aide, reduce business taxes and stimulate the economy instead. The government is not able to produce revenue, corporations create revenue. The soon you and yours understand that and realize where the money comes from, the sooner we start recovery.
Clinton will move us closer to one of the failing third world countries that the U.S used to help.

You pay the tax? Did you miss the debate? Comrade Trump pays NO TAX cause he is "smart." Try again...,
dont care what Donald Trump pays personally. What do his business ventures and his employees contribute? in the end exactly how much revenue is generated for the government through Donald Trump.
Now lets look at what your whore hillary contributes or is responsible for when it comes to generating revenue.
Trump wins.
 
Hillary will win, Trump cant even get republicans to support him
I was interested in Hill's speech in NH today. Here's a picture.
Fleischer: Clinton running to Sanders isn't genuine

There probably 100+ people. Last night's Trump rally had 9,000 and left 6,500 outside, according to police.

So, you say Trump can't get Republicans to support him? LMAO

It is really interesting the throngs of people who show up at the clown's rallies compared to the relatively few who come to listen to the bulldyke cackle. It appears that his supporters are more zealous, and hers will say they are going to vote for her, but she certainly does not inspire them.

Or is something amok in the polling data? Could there be a huge November surprise? I don't know, but the rallies don't match the polls.

On the other hand, Obama drew large crowds in areas where he did not do well in actually voting.

How Do Trump Crowd Sizes Really Compare to Obama’s 2008 Crowds?

Just as Trump has drawn big crowds in Democratic states, Obama got 20,000 for a rally in Austin in September 2007 in the lead up to the Democratic primary, which he lost to Hillary Clinton. He also lost the state to 2008 Republican nominee John McCain in the general election. In December 2007, Obama drew 29,000 at a Columbia, South Carolina, rally. He won the state’s Democratic primary but lost in the general.

Apparently crowd size at rallies is not a great indicator of election results.
as I have said many times. there is only one poll that is going to count.
that one comes in November
 
MP ignores that the Red States have the highest welfare rates in the nation. We could have all the money we need if we would cut back on the military-industrial complex we support.

BTM, I read it or heard 1 of 4 last week. Let me do some digging, but I believe it based on what I am hearing in west Texas and Salt Lake City among Republican women. They don't like Hillary but Trump's comments about women horrify many of them.
now lets look at where that welfare goes. to the cities in those red states that produce a high democrat vote.
Do you think the red parts of that red state would rather not pay for the democrats?
Why do you think the welfare scum find their ways to the red states. Its because there is more money in the government for social services. To refuse services would create human rights lawsuits.

Think again Sherlock

Welfare Hypocrisy: Red States Are The Real Freeloaders - The Ring of Fire - The Ring of Fire Network
 
Hillary will win, Trump cant even get republicans to support him
I was interested in Hill's speech in NH today. Here's a picture.
Fleischer: Clinton running to Sanders isn't genuine

There probably 100+ people. Last night's Trump rally had 9,000 and left 6,500 outside, according to police.

So, you say Trump can't get Republicans to support him? LMAO

It is really interesting the throngs of people who show up at the clown's rallies compared to the relatively few who come to listen to the bulldyke cackle. It appears that his supporters are more zealous, and hers will say they are going to vote for her, but she certainly does not inspire them.

Or is something amok in the polling data? Could there be a huge November surprise? I don't know, but the rallies don't match the polls.

On the other hand, Obama drew large crowds in areas where he did not do well in actually voting.

How Do Trump Crowd Sizes Really Compare to Obama’s 2008 Crowds?

Just as Trump has drawn big crowds in Democratic states, Obama got 20,000 for a rally in Austin in September 2007 in the lead up to the Democratic primary, which he lost to Hillary Clinton. He also lost the state to 2008 Republican nominee John McCain in the general election. In December 2007, Obama drew 29,000 at a Columbia, South Carolina, rally. He won the state’s Democratic primary but lost in the general.

Apparently crowd size at rallies is not a great indicator of election results.
Thank you for the comment. It will be interesting to see the turnout numbers for each. However, there are other factors at play such as driving people to the polls (doubt if Trump is working on that), getting dead people up to vote, and early voting. Will the armed forces have their mail in ballots early enough to make any kind of impact?
 
MP ignores that the Red States have the highest welfare rates in the nation. We could have all the money we need if we would cut back on the military-industrial complex we support.

BTM, I read it or heard 1 of 4 last week. Let me do some digging, but I believe it based on what I am hearing in west Texas and Salt Lake City among Republican women. They don't like Hillary but Trump's comments about women horrify many of them.
now lets look at where that welfare goes. to the cities in those red states that produce a high democrat vote.
Do you think the red parts of that red state would rather not pay for the democrats?
Why do you think the welfare scum find their ways to the red states. Its because there is more money in the government for social services. To refuse services would create human rights lawsuits.

Think again Sherlock

Welfare Hypocrisy: Red States Are The Real Freeloaders - The Ring of Fire - The Ring of Fire Network
yes, Im going to believe a site that is so far socialist that you almost have to speak a foreign language to read. Anything that has Ed Schultz as a contributing member is nothing but pure anti-american garbage
and I cant speak for the rest of the states but Maryland should certainly be in that high welfare list. Maryland is so out of control that the last governor had to steal the road funds to cover his illegal piece of shit friends.
The chart is wrong.
 
Hillary will win, Trump cant even get republicans to support him
I was interested in Hill's speech in NH today. Here's a picture.
Fleischer: Clinton running to Sanders isn't genuine

There probably 100+ people. Last night's Trump rally had 9,000 and left 6,500 outside, according to police.

So, you say Trump can't get Republicans to support him? LMAO

It is really interesting the throngs of people who show up at the clown's rallies compared to the relatively few who come to listen to the bulldyke cackle. It appears that his supporters are more zealous, and hers will say they are going to vote for her, but she certainly does not inspire them.

Or is something amok in the polling data? Could there be a huge November surprise? I don't know, but the rallies don't match the polls.

On the other hand, Obama drew large crowds in areas where he did not do well in actually voting.

How Do Trump Crowd Sizes Really Compare to Obama’s 2008 Crowds?

Just as Trump has drawn big crowds in Democratic states, Obama got 20,000 for a rally in Austin in September 2007 in the lead up to the Democratic primary, which he lost to Hillary Clinton. He also lost the state to 2008 Republican nominee John McCain in the general election. In December 2007, Obama drew 29,000 at a Columbia, South Carolina, rally. He won the state’s Democratic primary but lost in the general.:

Apparently crowd size at rallies is not a great indicator of election results.

:lame2:
 
White House Watch - Rasmussen Reports™

57% of people think Hillary won debate, 30% Trump, 13% unsure

If Donnie keeps dissing on and pissing off women, Clinton will win handily.
I sure hope so. She's up and he's down. We need that trend to stay just like that till election day.
What exactly is it that causes people like you to want to see this country fail?
Why would you want to destroy something that has worked for so many years for so many.
Fail? Clinton won't make it fail. Like her husband we'll see it start rolling again, even beyond Obama. And neither Clinton nor anyone else, especially someone like Trump, can fix its underlying ills. For that you need to start a new nation, something that should have been done long ago. Three nations would be good and we can let you idiots go off and starve and poison yourselves until you learn what you refuse to learn from us and from history.
you couldnt survive without us. We are the ones that pay the tax that is then rerouted to the welfare system for you to suck off of.
We would take with us the majority of jobs, the majority of workers, industry food.
You would end up with a majority looking to be cared for by others.
Clinton is not going to make the country stronger by increasing social welfare. What we need is someone that is willing to cut back on social expenses, cut back on foreign aide, reduce business taxes and stimulate the economy instead. The government is not able to produce revenue, corporations create revenue. The soon you and yours understand that and realize where the money comes from, the sooner we start recovery.
Clinton will move us closer to one of the failing third world countries that the U.S used to help.

You pay the tax? Did you miss the debate? Comrade Trump pays NO TAX cause he is "smart." Try again...,
Paying "no" taxes IS smart and fine if you are willing to take lower incentives for investments. BTW, he did not say he paid "no" tax.
 
I sure hope so. She's up and he's down. We need that trend to stay just like that till election day.
What exactly is it that causes people like you to want to see this country fail?
Why would you want to destroy something that has worked for so many years for so many.
Fail? Clinton won't make it fail. Like her husband we'll see it start rolling again, even beyond Obama. And neither Clinton nor anyone else, especially someone like Trump, can fix its underlying ills. For that you need to start a new nation, something that should have been done long ago. Three nations would be good and we can let you idiots go off and starve and poison yourselves until you learn what you refuse to learn from us and from history.
you couldnt survive without us. We are the ones that pay the tax that is then rerouted to the welfare system for you to suck off of.
We would take with us the majority of jobs, the majority of workers, industry food.
You would end up with a majority looking to be cared for by others.
Clinton is not going to make the country stronger by increasing social welfare. What we need is someone that is willing to cut back on social expenses, cut back on foreign aide, reduce business taxes and stimulate the economy instead. The government is not able to produce revenue, corporations create revenue. The soon you and yours understand that and realize where the money comes from, the sooner we start recovery.
Clinton will move us closer to one of the failing third world countries that the U.S used to help.

You pay the tax? Did you miss the debate? Comrade Trump pays NO TAX cause he is "smart." Try again...,
Paying "no" taxes IS smart and fine if you are willing to take lower incentives for investments. BTW, he did not say he paid "no" tax.
dont even try. the left was told by their spokespeople that Donald said that. Therefore, he said that (even though he didnt) What they are hoping for is that this will force Donald to show them something they want to see but he has no obligation to show them.
 
What exactly is it that causes people like you to want to see this country fail?
Why would you want to destroy something that has worked for so many years for so many.
Fail? Clinton won't make it fail. Like her husband we'll see it start rolling again, even beyond Obama. And neither Clinton nor anyone else, especially someone like Trump, can fix its underlying ills. For that you need to start a new nation, something that should have been done long ago. Three nations would be good and we can let you idiots go off and starve and poison yourselves until you learn what you refuse to learn from us and from history.
you couldnt survive without us. We are the ones that pay the tax that is then rerouted to the welfare system for you to suck off of.
We would take with us the majority of jobs, the majority of workers, industry food.
You would end up with a majority looking to be cared for by others.
Clinton is not going to make the country stronger by increasing social welfare. What we need is someone that is willing to cut back on social expenses, cut back on foreign aide, reduce business taxes and stimulate the economy instead. The government is not able to produce revenue, corporations create revenue. The soon you and yours understand that and realize where the money comes from, the sooner we start recovery.
Clinton will move us closer to one of the failing third world countries that the U.S used to help.

You pay the tax? Did you miss the debate? Comrade Trump pays NO TAX cause he is "smart." Try again...,
Paying "no" taxes IS smart and fine if you are willing to take lower incentives for investments. BTW, he did not say he paid "no" tax.
dont even try. the left was told by their spokespeople that Donald said that. Therefore, he said that (even though he didnt) What they are hoping for is that this will force Donald to show them something they want to see but he has no obligation to show them.
And another thing....Why would I want to see his tax return? It's none of my business...BUT, Hillary's health as POTUS IS my business.
 
Fail? Clinton won't make it fail. Like her husband we'll see it start rolling again, even beyond Obama. And neither Clinton nor anyone else, especially someone like Trump, can fix its underlying ills. For that you need to start a new nation, something that should have been done long ago. Three nations would be good and we can let you idiots go off and starve and poison yourselves until you learn what you refuse to learn from us and from history.
you couldnt survive without us. We are the ones that pay the tax that is then rerouted to the welfare system for you to suck off of.
We would take with us the majority of jobs, the majority of workers, industry food.
You would end up with a majority looking to be cared for by others.
Clinton is not going to make the country stronger by increasing social welfare. What we need is someone that is willing to cut back on social expenses, cut back on foreign aide, reduce business taxes and stimulate the economy instead. The government is not able to produce revenue, corporations create revenue. The soon you and yours understand that and realize where the money comes from, the sooner we start recovery.
Clinton will move us closer to one of the failing third world countries that the U.S used to help.

You pay the tax? Did you miss the debate? Comrade Trump pays NO TAX cause he is "smart." Try again...,
Paying "no" taxes IS smart and fine if you are willing to take lower incentives for investments. BTW, he did not say he paid "no" tax.
dont even try. the left was told by their spokespeople that Donald said that. Therefore, he said that (even though he didnt) What they are hoping for is that this will force Donald to show them something they want to see but he has no obligation to show them.
And another thing....Why would I want to see his tax return? It's none of my business...BUT, Hillary's health as POTUS IS my business.
Why, are you thinking of voting for her?
 
Clinton is a terrible campaigner but I think she'll manage to pull it out since she is less likely to self-destruct than Trump in the next few weeks.

Donnie will not listen to his handlers, even when they tell him the absolute truth. He is now threatening his staff to make sure they NEVER say he lost the debate. He is a walking, talking, breathing, narcissistic egomaniac. Hillary is not perfect, but really....Do you want to see the United States destroyed?
I don't think anyone knows what he'd do as president, not even him. He's promised and lied so much he ignore all that and just do what he pleases. He'd be the best president we've ever had or the worst. I guess I'm just not a gambler.
 
MP ignores that the Red States have the highest welfare rates in the nation. We could have all the money we need if we would cut back on the military-industrial complex we support.

BTM, I read it or heard 1 of 4 last week. Let me do some digging, but I believe it based on what I am hearing in west Texas and Salt Lake City among Republican women. They don't like Hillary but Trump's comments about women horrify many of them.
now lets look at where that welfare goes. to the cities in those red states that produce a high democrat vote.
Do you think the red parts of that red state would rather not pay for the democrats?
Why do you think the welfare scum find their ways to the red states. Its because there is more money in the government for social services. To refuse services would create human rights lawsuits.
The white crackers of the country side get their fair share, as well, and MP ignores that.
 
Who do you think is going to win?

I believe Hillary Clinton will win the election even though I believe she will be the worst President ever... Oh and don't believe that I believe Donald John Trump would be any better!


The Loser in this election is the American Population!
 
MP ignores that the Red States have the highest welfare rates in the nation. We could have all the money we need if we would cut back on the military-industrial complex we support.

BTM, I read it or heard 1 of 4 last week. Let me do some digging, but I believe it based on what I am hearing in west Texas and Salt Lake City among Republican women. They don't like Hillary but Trump's comments about women horrify many of them.
now lets look at where that welfare goes. to the cities in those red states that produce a high democrat vote.
Do you think the red parts of that red state would rather not pay for the democrats?
Why do you think the welfare scum find their ways to the red states. Its because there is more money in the government for social services. To refuse services would create human rights lawsuits.

Think again Sherlock

Welfare Hypocrisy: Red States Are The Real Freeloaders - The Ring of Fire - The Ring of Fire Network
yes, Im going to believe a site that is so far socialist that you almost have to speak a foreign language to read. Anything that has Ed Schultz as a contributing member is nothing but pure anti-american garbage
and I cant speak for the rest of the states but Maryland should certainly be in that high welfare list. Maryland is so out of control that the last governor had to steal the road funds to cover his illegal piece of shit friends.
The chart is wrong.
I probably have told you this, but I absolutely love your avatar! If someone could change the pic to HilLIARy and put that on a Trump t shirt, they would make millions!
 

Forum List

Back
Top