POOF Lindell Video Disappears

Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
Come back when you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
You tell me. I am not a cyber warfare expert, again, are you?
 
Because there are cyber experts behind it, with as many degrees as other experts. Some who got their training serving their country.
Are there? Lindell's "expert" is anonymous. No way to know if he is an expert or what degree he has. I remember Powell citing an anonymous "expert" who got their training serving the country too, but it turned out that was a guy who washed out of intelligence classes with the US military and became a mechanic instead.

Forgive me if I don't take Lindell's word at face value.

Other experts can have at it. If they cannot debunk it, it is over.

Oh, so they've produced the raw data to evaluate?
I am sure the experts will not be anonymous in court. The credentials will be vetted.

The data they produced are PCAPs. Experts can find out what went from where to there with those, and they have.
Powell tried to make “Spider” anonymous in court but did a laughably bad job because the name of the person was located in the file metadata. I guess they didn’t want their credentials vetted.

The PCAPs have not been produced. The data they flashed on the screen that they called a PCAP was not a PCAP.
They have them. That backround has nothing to do with what they have. Again, if this gets to a court fraud will be proven.
If they have them, they haven’t produced them, which is what you claimed. Experts can’t find out anything if these people don’t produce their data.

Why do you think they’d want to keep it secret? Seems they should want other experts to evaluate it. That’s what mystery man said in the video.
What are you talking about and who are they supposed to present them to except a court? Lindell made clear what they say and the data itself proves it happened.

You lose.
LOLOL

No one is losing because pillow biting guy got his hands on faked data.
Prove it in court.
Thanks for confessing it's not proven.
Yet.
Yet you claim it's been proven.

Yet you can't explain why there are multiple versions of their data, with the ID column manipulated.

Yet you can't explain how they obtained the data.

Yet you apparently still don't know who Dennis Montgomery, the source of that data, is. Here's a clue for ya... he's been caught fabricating data in the past...


Months after Snow described the claims from the bench, the Sheriff's Office released more records describing its deal with Montgomery.

One internal email stated: "After reviewing all the hard drivers our experts concluded that Dennis Montgomery deliberately compiled massive amounts of data on to these drives for the purpose of obfuscating the fact the data itself contained no evidence to support Dennis Montgomery's claims."
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
You tell me. I am not a cyber warfare expert, again, are you?
I’m telling you why.

Because they’re fabricated.
 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
didnt they address this back in December?

Yup. Idiots never learn.
 
Because there are cyber experts behind it, with as many degrees as other experts. Some who got their training serving their country.
Are there? Lindell's "expert" is anonymous. No way to know if he is an expert or what degree he has. I remember Powell citing an anonymous "expert" who got their training serving the country too, but it turned out that was a guy who washed out of intelligence classes with the US military and became a mechanic instead.

Forgive me if I don't take Lindell's word at face value.

Other experts can have at it. If they cannot debunk it, it is over.

Oh, so they've produced the raw data to evaluate?
I am sure the experts will not be anonymous in court. The credentials will be vetted.

The data they produced are PCAPs. Experts can find out what went from where to there with those, and they have.
Powell tried to make “Spider” anonymous in court but did a laughably bad job because the name of the person was located in the file metadata. I guess they didn’t want their credentials vetted.

The PCAPs have not been produced. The data they flashed on the screen that they called a PCAP was not a PCAP.
They have them. That backround has nothing to do with what they have. Again, if this gets to a court fraud will be proven.
If they have them, they haven’t produced them, which is what you claimed. Experts can’t find out anything if these people don’t produce their data.

Why do you think they’d want to keep it secret? Seems they should want other experts to evaluate it. That’s what mystery man said in the video.
What are you talking about and who are they supposed to present them to except a court? Lindell made clear what they say and the data itself proves it happened.

You lose.
LOLOL

No one is losing because pillow biting guy got his hands on faked data.
Prove it in court.
Thanks for confessing it's not proven.
Yet.
Yet you claim it's been proven.

Yet you can't explain why there are multiple versions of their data, with the ID column manipulated.

Yet you can't explain how they obtained the data.

Yet you apparently still don't know who Dennis Montgomery, the source of that data, is. Here's a clue for ya... he's been caught fabricating data in the past...

Months after Snow described the claims from the bench, the Sheriff's Office released more records describing its deal with Montgomery.
One internal email stated: "After reviewing all the hard drivers our experts concluded that Dennis Montgomery deliberately compiled massive amounts of data on to these drives for the purpose of obfuscating the fact the data itself contained no evidence to support Dennis Montgomery's claims."
They say the data proves it, and that is who I believe. The actions of the progressives, Democrats and all the corrupt actors scream fucking guilt and everyone knows it.
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
You tell me. I am not a cyber warfare expert, again, are you?
I’m telling you why.

Because they’re fabricated.
Again, prove it. You have proven 0.
 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
Come back when you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
LOL

So you can't explain how missing data magically appeared days later, huh?
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
You tell me. I am not a cyber warfare expert, again, are you?
I’m telling you why.

Because they’re fabricated.
Again, prove it. You have proven 0.
I just did. There is no way a list of thousands of real MAC addresses would be perfectly random.

They were fabricated.
 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
Come back when you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
LOL

So you can't explain how missing data magically appeared days later, huh?
PA. couldn't, why should I? MI deleted their security logs.
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
You tell me. I am not a cyber warfare expert, again, are you?
I’m telling you why.

Because they’re fabricated.
Again, prove it. You have proven 0.
I just did. There is no way a list of thousands of real MAC addresses would be perfectly random.

They were fabricated.
You cannot prove it by saying it, moron.
 
Because there are cyber experts behind it, with as many degrees as other experts. Some who got their training serving their country.
Are there? Lindell's "expert" is anonymous. No way to know if he is an expert or what degree he has. I remember Powell citing an anonymous "expert" who got their training serving the country too, but it turned out that was a guy who washed out of intelligence classes with the US military and became a mechanic instead.

Forgive me if I don't take Lindell's word at face value.

Other experts can have at it. If they cannot debunk it, it is over.

Oh, so they've produced the raw data to evaluate?
I am sure the experts will not be anonymous in court. The credentials will be vetted.

The data they produced are PCAPs. Experts can find out what went from where to there with those, and they have.
Powell tried to make “Spider” anonymous in court but did a laughably bad job because the name of the person was located in the file metadata. I guess they didn’t want their credentials vetted.

The PCAPs have not been produced. The data they flashed on the screen that they called a PCAP was not a PCAP.
They have them. That backround has nothing to do with what they have. Again, if this gets to a court fraud will be proven.
If they have them, they haven’t produced them, which is what you claimed. Experts can’t find out anything if these people don’t produce their data.

Why do you think they’d want to keep it secret? Seems they should want other experts to evaluate it. That’s what mystery man said in the video.
What are you talking about and who are they supposed to present them to except a court? Lindell made clear what they say and the data itself proves it happened.

You lose.
LOLOL

No one is losing because pillow biting guy got his hands on faked data.
Prove it in court.
Thanks for confessing it's not proven.
Yet.
Yet you claim it's been proven.

Yet you can't explain why there are multiple versions of their data, with the ID column manipulated.

Yet you can't explain how they obtained the data.

Yet you apparently still don't know who Dennis Montgomery, the source of that data, is. Here's a clue for ya... he's been caught fabricating data in the past...

Months after Snow described the claims from the bench, the Sheriff's Office released more records describing its deal with Montgomery.
One internal email stated: "After reviewing all the hard drivers our experts concluded that Dennis Montgomery deliberately compiled massive amounts of data on to these drives for the purpose of obfuscating the fact the data itself contained no evidence to support Dennis Montgomery's claims."
They say the data proves it, and that is who I believe. The actions of the progressives, Democrats and all the corrupt actors scream fucking guilt and everyone knows it.
LOL

They won't say how they obtained the data -- but you believe them.

They won't say why their data changed -- but you believe them.

The source of the data is a known fraudster -- but you believe them.

PillowGuy's had this data for 5 months now and hasn't taken it to court or worked with the FBI or DoJ -- but you believe them.

PillowGuy's cyber security "expert" is hiding from the public -- but you believe them.

The cpac data displayed in PillowGuy's video is not really cpac data -- but you believe them.

All this has been thoroughly debunked -- but you believe them.

That you still believe them despite all this is a reflection on you.
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

Yep. So again, why are the MAC addresses randomly generated? And why do the MAC addresses have random generation without FF appearing anywhere in thousands and thousands of them?
You tell me. I am not a cyber warfare expert, again, are you?
I’m telling you why.

Because they’re fabricated.
Again, prove it. You have proven 0.
I just did. There is no way a list of thousands of real MAC addresses would be perfectly random.

They were fabricated.
You cannot prove it by saying it, moron.
Isn’t that what Lindell just did? Proved it by saying it.

Lol

You can get the spreadsheet yourself. Each hexadecimal entry has about 140 instances. Give or take. Except FF. Zero entries.

Not possible
 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
Come back when you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
LOL

So you can't explain how missing data magically appeared days later, huh?
PA. couldn't, why should I? MI deleted their security logs.
That's only because you're an idiot since there's only one explanation... someone added the data. You know, the very same data Lindell laughably called, "immutable."
 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
Come back when you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
LOL

So you can't explain how missing data magically appeared days later, huh?
PA. couldn't, why should I? MI deleted their security logs.
That's only because you're an idiot since there's only one explanation... someone added the data. You know, the very same data Lindell laughably called, "immutable."
Then you have no problem taking it to court?
 
Here is a source that no longer has the video. Less than 2 hours after it was posted and it is gone. Why?


I was skeptical, but with 30 years in cyber security I have to admit it is compelling. The gentleman speaks the correct lingo and makes a solid case (not Lindell, the one not shown.)

The Problem is, if the court were to actually do their job, the Nazi democrats would immediately launch a shooting war. The SCOTUS are cowards, and have no love for our Constitution, so they simply aren't going to risk their cushy positions to save the nation. We would need people of honor, and outside of Thomas, we simply don't have them.
But the evidence can be explained easily to the layman. The fact that it happened cannot be discounted. This information has to get out. There has to be some rallies for this evidence to be heard. They will run out of Anti -Fa if enough happen.

Lindell is trying to do that. Remember Lindell has the real "big guy" on his team.
LOL

You poor thing, bless your heart. That it happened is not actually a fact.
The data says it happened. That data will now have to be debunked. I do not think that is going to happen. If it gets to a court it is game over. IF the courts refuse to hear it, it is just another admission of the already obvious guilt.
LOLOL

Yes, the fake data says the election was stolen. Sadly for you, that's not likely to ever be shown in court. In case you missed it, Barnes & Thornburg kicked Lindell's attorney, a former partner of that lawfirm, to the curb.
Prove it is fake because that is what someone will have to do if it gets to court. If the court refuses and audits reveal fraud there is going to be Hell to pay.

Too easy... here's a screen shot captured from when Lindell posted this online...

f-02x-thumb-900xauto-3077197.jpg


Notice all the missing data in the ID columns. Now look at that same data days later...

electionrecords-thumb-900xauto-3077191.jpg


So? Where'd that data come from? If they had that data from pcap files, there would have been no data missing from their earlier revision of that data.
Come back when you know what you are talking about. Thanks.
LOL

So you can't explain how missing data magically appeared days later, huh?
PA. couldn't, why should I? MI deleted their security logs.
That's only because you're an idiot since there's only one explanation... someone added the data. You know, the very same data Lindell laughably called, "immutable."
Then you have no problem taking it to court?
LOL

I don't, Lindell does.
 
You morons will grasp at any straw. Lindell hasn't got Jack Sh#t. It will not ever see the Supreme Court.

Lindell could have posted it on mypillow.com if it was earth shaking, irrefutable truth. Then nobody could take it down, but no. He does not want the company any way involved. He knows it is bullsh#t.

The video names Amazon.com as being one of the ASN's that has access to the dominion voting machines. I'm sure that's libel against Jeff Bezos, and if put on the mypillow website, would make the company (and not Lindel personally) financially culpable.
Amazon is one of the largest providers of cloud storage and network storage. Amazon owns countless banks of IPs it leases to other companies.
 
Everything points to fraud.


Get out of town.

You know the "evidence" your talking about is some guy who made an Excel spreadsheet, scribbled down some fancy looking numbers and claims it proves fraud. I mean, it'd be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah, those MAC addresses? They're fake. Those numbers are not all random, they have meaning and therefore there shouldn't be a random distribution of them. But you know what? There is. This evidence came from a well known fraud, but it makes no difference to you. Your satisfied just to believe it unquestioningly.
The data that was fabricated to show fraud shows fraud!

Prove it.
I told you. The MAC addresses are composed of a random distribution of numbers. There's no way that actual collection of MAC addresses would be totally randomly distributed because those numbers have significance.

Lindell is producing next to no evidence and what he does have is obviously fabricated.
Where is your degree in computer science from? Patrick Byrne has a PHD in it and he says it is real.
Patrick Byrne does not have a PhD in computer science. I'll take him more seriously when he explains why the MAC addresses are randomly distributed.
I stand corrected.
Patrick received a bachelor’s degree in philosophy and Asian studies from Dartmouth College, a master’s in philosophy (ethics) from Cambridge University as a Marshall Scholar, and a doctorate in philosophy (focusing on political theory, jurisprudence, and economics) from Stanford University. He has taught at the university level and frequently guest-lectures on business, the Internet, leadership and ethics.

A very smart and patriotic man.

This is not the resume of a computer infosec professional.
 

Forum List

Back
Top