Portugal legalizes Sodomy/ Homo marriage is legal now.

Curvelight is is about five beers short of a six pack for even arguing against the fact that God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah because of their homosexual acts. Ollie explained it perfectly when he stated that piece about the sodomites wanting to "know" then men[angels] who were in Lots house, the sodomites wanted to anally pound those angels and the fact that they turned down virgin women proves without a doubt they were homosexuals. Curvelight is being a pathetic troll arguing for the hell of it.
 
I would suggest Roman's Chapter 1 & 2 on Homosexuality, Sin, Judgement, and impartiality. Just a thought.

That's a different argument. The debate has been centered around the claim homosexuals were a reason for S+G's destruction. There is nothing to support that and we are given reasons why the destruction occurred.


So why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed, for homophobic?
 
Curvelight is is about five beers short of a six pack for even arguing against the fact that God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah because of their homosexual acts. Ollie explained it perfectly when he stated that piece about the sodomites wanting to "know" then men[angels] who were in Lots house, the sodomites wanted to anally pound those angels and the fact that they turned down virgin women proves without a doubt they were homosexuals. Curvelight is being a pathetic troll arguing for the hell of it.

Curvelight wants to make God in his image. I have made the same point more than once with Curvelight. Best to just leave the troll alone.
 
Curvelight is is about five beers short of a six pack for even arguing against the fact that God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah because of their homosexual acts. Ollie explained it perfectly when he stated that piece about the sodomites wanting to "know" then men[angels] who were in Lots house, the sodomites wanted to anally pound those angels and the fact that they turned down virgin women proves without a doubt they were homosexuals. Curvelight is being a pathetic troll arguing for the hell of it.


So did you accidentally miss all the evidence that shows why the homosexual argument has no supporting evidence or did you purposefully close your eyes?
 
I would suggest Roman's Chapter 1 & 2 on Homosexuality, Sin, Judgement, and impartiality. Just a thought.

That's a different argument. The debate has been centered around the claim homosexuals were a reason for S+G's destruction. There is nothing to support that and we are given reasons why the destruction occurred.


So why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed, for homophobic?


You claim to know the Bible so how is it you are ignorant of the reasons given?


Ezek. 16:49-50
“Now this is the sin of your sister Sodom:

She and her daughters were arrogant,

overfed and unconcerned; they did not help

the poor and needy.* They were haughty and

did detestable things before me.* Therefore I

did away with them as you have seen.”*
 
Curvelight is is about five beers short of a six pack for even arguing against the fact that God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah because of their homosexual acts. Ollie explained it perfectly when he stated that piece about the sodomites wanting to "know" then men[angels] who were in Lots house, the sodomites wanted to anally pound those angels and the fact that they turned down virgin women proves without a doubt they were homosexuals. Curvelight is being a pathetic troll arguing for the hell of it.

Curvelight wants to make God in his image. I have made the same point more than once with Curvelight. Best to just leave the troll alone.

That's ironic. Sadly, this selfish view is often projected by people who cannot honestly defend their positions.
 
Curve, your on ignore. Once you go there, you don't come back. I saw you quoted in another person's post and replied to them.
 
That's a different argument. The debate has been centered around the claim homosexuals were a reason for S+G's destruction. There is nothing to support that and we are given reasons why the destruction occurred.


So why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed, for homophobic?


You claim to know the Bible so how is it you are ignorant of the reasons given?


Ezek. 16:49-50
“Now this is the sin of your sister Sodom:

She and her daughters were arrogant,

overfed and unconcerned; they did not help

the poor and needy.* They were haughty and

did detestable things before me.* Therefore I

did away with them as you have seen.”*


God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah for its homosexuality along with its wickedness. That the angels struck the men of the city with blindness to keep from getting sodomized says alot about the sin that homosexuality is.
 
So why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed, for homophobic?


You claim to know the Bible so how is it you are ignorant of the reasons given?


Ezek. 16:49-50
“Now this is the sin of your sister Sodom:

She and her daughters were arrogant,

overfed and unconcerned; they did not help

the poor and needy.* They were haughty and

did detestable things before me.* Therefore I

did away with them as you have seen.”*


God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah for its homosexuality along with its wickedness. That the angels struck the men of the city with blindness to keep from getting sodomized says alot about the sin that homosexuality is.


So you ask for the reasons S + G got destroyed.

The scripture is provided.

The scripture did not satisfy you.

You rewrote scripture to add homosexuality.

If you were going to give your reasons and not respect scripture then why waste the time to ask? Just to posture?
 
Curvelight the sodomite defender and lover has no explanation for this verse:

Jude 1:7

7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Now go ahead and tapdance Curvelight.
 
You claim to know the Bible so how is it you are ignorant of the reasons given?


Ezek. 16:49-50
“Now this is the sin of your sister Sodom:

She and her daughters were arrogant,

overfed and unconcerned; they did not help

the poor and needy.* They were haughty and

did detestable things before me.* Therefore I

did away with them as you have seen.”*


God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah for its homosexuality along with its wickedness. That the angels struck the men of the city with blindness to keep from getting sodomized says alot about the sin that homosexuality is.


So you ask for the reasons S + G got destroyed.

The scripture is provided.

The scripture did not satisfy you.

You rewrote scripture to add homosexuality.

If you were going to give your reasons and not respect scripture then why waste the time to ask? Just to posture?


Nothing was rewritten stupid, did you even read the book of Genesis up until Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed? If homosexsuality was so right why did the angels smite the sodomites with blindness? What about the verse from Jude 1:7, will you now call Jude a homophobe and distorter of scripture?
 
God destroyed Sodom and Gommorah for its homosexuality along with its wickedness. That the angels struck the men of the city with blindness to keep from getting sodomized says alot about the sin that homosexuality is.


So you ask for the reasons S + G got destroyed.

The scripture is provided.

The scripture did not satisfy you.

You rewrote scripture to add homosexuality.

If you were going to give your reasons and not respect scripture then why waste the time to ask? Just to posture?


Nothing was rewritten stupid, did you even read the book of Genesis up until Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed? If homosexsuality was so right why did the angels smite the sodomites with blindness? What about the verse from Jude 1:7, will you now call Jude a homophobe and distorter of scripture?

Why were they hit with blindness? Did you somehow miss the reasons given for the destruction in Ezekiel? Absolutely nothing about homosexuality was stated there or any other verse. Jude simply refers to the two angels. The "strange flesh" is talking about the angels and not homosexuality. It doesn't say anything about homosexuality either. Yes, you are guilty of rewriting scripture to include homosexuality when it is clear it is never given as a reason. So with all the verses in the OT that state why the destruction happened you ignore those, try to add homosexuality, then reference Jude where once again, homosexuality is not mentioned. What else you got?
 
So you ask for the reasons S + G got destroyed.

The scripture is provided.

The scripture did not satisfy you.

You rewrote scripture to add homosexuality.

If you were going to give your reasons and not respect scripture then why waste the time to ask? Just to posture?


Nothing was rewritten stupid, did you even read the book of Genesis up until Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed? If homosexsuality was so right why did the angels smite the sodomites with blindness? What about the verse from Jude 1:7, will you now call Jude a homophobe and distorter of scripture?

Why were they hit with blindness? Did you somehow miss the reasons given for the destruction in Ezekiel? Absolutely nothing about homosexuality was stated there or any other verse. Jude simply refers to the two angels. The "strange flesh" is talking about the angels and not homosexuality. It doesn't say anything about homosexuality either. Yes, you are guilty of rewriting scripture to include homosexuality when it is clear it is never given as a reason. So with all the verses in the OT that state why the destruction happened you ignore those, try to add homosexuality, then reference Jude where once again, homosexuality is not mentioned. What else you got?


The strange flesh wasn't about angels jackass, it was because they were men in their eyes, even after Lot offered his daughters the sodomites still wanted the men. Jude furthermore mentions sexual immorality, the sodomites didn't know the "men" were angels, thus they said "bright out the *MEN* that we may know them."
 
Nothing was rewritten stupid, did you even read the book of Genesis up until Sodom and Gommorah was destroyed? If homosexsuality was so right why did the angels smite the sodomites with blindness? What about the verse from Jude 1:7, will you now call Jude a homophobe and distorter of scripture?

Why were they hit with blindness? Did you somehow miss the reasons given for the destruction in Ezekiel? Absolutely nothing about homosexuality was stated there or any other verse. Jude simply refers to the two angels. The "strange flesh" is talking about the angels and not homosexuality. It doesn't say anything about homosexuality either. Yes, you are guilty of rewriting scripture to include homosexuality when it is clear it is never given as a reason. So with all the verses in the OT that state why the destruction happened you ignore those, try to add homosexuality, then reference Jude where once again, homosexuality is not mentioned. What else you got?


The strange flesh wasn't about angels jackass, it was because they were men in their eyes, even after Lot offered his daughters the sodomites still wanted the men. Jude furthermore mentions sexual immorality, the sodomites didn't know the "men" were angels, thus they said "bright out the *MEN* that we may know them."

The author of Jude knew they were angels, thus the "strange flesh" is not a sexual reference. If you had studied this narrative at all you would know visitors to S+G were often beaten, robbed, and killed just for being foreign. Why do you insist on ignoring readily available info just to try and force homosexuality into the story?
 
Curvelight the sodomite defender and lover has no explanation for this verse:

Jude 1:7

7 as Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities around them in a similar manner to these, having given themselves over to sexual immorality and gone after strange flesh, are set forth as an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

Now go ahead and tapdance Curvelight.


There are several forms of sexual immorality so how do you conclude homosexuality when it is never ever mentioned?
 
Curve, your on ignore. Once you go there, you don't come back. I saw you quoted in another person's post and replied to them.




Good for you IGNORE people who you CAN NOT debate it shows what in open minded intellectual you are.

Nope, I did it because they were jackasses with nothing to offer. You are in that group now too.


So by the time you get done adding people to your ignore list the only ones not on it will be people who agree with you. Basically, you are on a message board to seek only reinforcement of your own positions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top