Post Any Evidence you are Aware of that Donald Trump Falsified Business Records to Conceal a Crime

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Let's keep this thread clean, folks.

If you don't know of evidence that Donald Trump falsified business records to conceal a crime, move along to another thread.

Thanks.

I suggest that you listen to the opening arguments on Monday...

 

[Seymour Flops]

the payment was an illegal campaign contribution, because it exceeded $2,700 limit.

and why was it campaign contribution? because it benefited trump's campaign by silencing damning information.

Yes, that is the weak theory that Alvin Bragg and the feds rejected. The election year was close, and none of the other cases looked like they could possibly have a trial before the election, so someone told Bragg to push the case no matter how bad it made him look.

But, of course, Trump is not on trial for illegal campaign contribution, nor do we know that an illegal campaign contribution is what Bragg has in mind as the underlying crime.

So, what is your evidence of Trump making a false entry into a business record?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Falsifying business records IS A CRIME.

Geez.

Doing so to cover up campaign finance violations IS A CRIME

Doing so in cooperation with others (Cohen, Weissenberg, et al) is called "conspiracy" which, when done in support of a criminal act, IS A CRIME.

Yes, what is your evidence that Trump falsified a business record to conceal a crime?

 

[Seymour Flops]

It is permissible for you to listen to the secret recording...it may be painful for you to expose your mind to something other than your echo chamber but you'd be a better person for it. God knows you can't be a worse person. That would be impossible.

I'll listen to it, if you tell me how it is evidence that Trump falsified a business record to conceal a crime, which is the one and only thing Trump is on trial for.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Let's keep this thread clean, folks.

If you don't know of evidence that Donald Trump falsified business records to conceal a crime, move along to another thread.

Thanks.

Can you explain how a member of this forum would come to be in possession of such evidence?

 

[candycorn]

I'll listen to it, if you tell me how it is evidence that Trump falsified a business record to conceal a crime, which is the one and only thing Trump is on trial for.

Did he list it as “hush money to a porn star” on the books?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Can you explain how a member of this forum would come to be in possession of such evidence?

If there were such evidence - and it didn't come from an absurdly unreliable source like Michael Cohen - the Democrats would have leaked it a long time ago.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Did he list it as “hush money to a porn star” on the books?

I seriously doubt he listed anything on the books. Donald Trump is the head of the Trump organizations, not its book keeper.

But maybe Cohen will tell us that he saw Trump sitting with a green eyeshade making pen and ink entries into a ledger book.

 

[rightwinger]

I'll listen to it, if you tell me how it is evidence that Trump falsified a business record to conceal a crime, which is the one and only thing Trump is on trial for.

The evidence will come out in the coming weeks
Listen to the opening statements on Monday and they will detail their evidence against Trump

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If there were such evidence - and it didn't come from an absurdly unreliable source like Michael Cohen - the Democrats would have leaked it a long time ago.

So, you have no explanation of how someone on this forum could be in possession of what only the prosecutors would have.

Thanks.

 

[candycorn]

I seriously doubt he listed anything on the books. Donald Trump is the head of the Trump organizations, not its book keeper.

But maybe Cohen will tell us that he saw Trump sitting with a green eyeshade making pen and ink entries into a ledger book.

Gee, sounds like fraud then...you have to account for your monies when you’re running for President. Thanks for playing .

 

[rightwinger]

I seriously doubt he listed anything on the books. Donald Trump is the head of the Trump organizations, not its book keeper.

But maybe Cohen will tell us that he saw Trump sitting with a green eyeshade making pen and ink entries into a ledger book.

Cohen will testify what Trump told him to do regarding Stormy Daniels. What he suggested and what Trump wanted done.

He will also tell what those checks Trump wrote to him were used for

 

[Seymour Flops]

The evidence will come out in the coming weeks
Listen to the opening statements on Monday and they will detail their evidence against Trump

What will that evidence consist of?

Or . . . wait. It's finally sinking in. Wow, dawn breaks over Marblehead . . .

You mean to tell me that you Demos have gotten yourselves all geeked up that Trump committed a crime and none of you has any idea what the evidence might be?

Really?

 

[rightwinger]

What will that evidence consist of?

Guess what Skippy?
I have not seen the evidence.

That will be coming out in the next few weeks.
You will deny it all anyway, so what difference does it make?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Cohen will testify what Trump told him to do regarding Stormy Daniels. What he suggested and what Trump wanted done.

He will also tell what those checks Trump wrote to him were used for

I'm glad that you're admitting that Cohen will be the evidence. That will be the most epic cross-examination since Abraham Lincoln and the Almanac Case.

I wonder why you took so long to finally say that, and why your sister Dems haven't said it?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Gee, sounds like fraud then...you have to account for your monies when you’re running for President. Thanks for playing .

Trump isn't on trial for fraud, he's on trial for making false entries to conceal a crime.

 

[candycorn]

Trump isn't on trial for fraud, he's on trial for making false entries to conceal a crime.

 

[candycorn]

I'm glad that you're admitting that Cohen will be the evidence. That will be the most epic cross-examination since Abraham Lincoln and the Almanac Case.

I wonder why you took so long to finally say that, and why your sister Dems haven't said it?

Well, the recording of Cohen and Trump talking about how to commit the crime will be there too. Your blob engaging in a crime could be pretty damaging don’t your think?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Well, the recording of Cohen and Trump talking about how to commit the crime will be there too. Your blob engaging in a crime could be pretty damaging don’t your think?

The tape talks about Trump making false entries into business records? I'll listen if it does.

 

[WorldWatcher]

I'm glad that you're admitting that Cohen will be the evidence. That will be the most epic cross-examination since Abraham Lincoln and the Almanac Case.

I wonder why you took so long to finally say that, and why your sister Dems haven't said it?

Cohen won't "be the evidence" he will be one part of an overall case.

To think that the entire case depends on a single person. That isn't the case, the trial is projected to take 4-6 weeks and IIRC the prosecution witness list is about 42 individuals. Those individuals will cooberate the testimony of others and confirm evidence. IIRC the prosecution incudes:

• Michael Cohen
• Stormy Daniels
• Keith Davidson
• Karen McDougal
• David Pecker
• Dylan Howard
• Jeffrey McConney
• Kellyanne Conway
• Rhona Graff
• Madeline Westerhout
• Hope Hicks
• Plus others

Notice that testimony will be offered not just from Cohen and Daniels, it will be presented by FPOTUS#45 insiders and staff members. Their testimony will introduce a variety of evidence such as phone records, audio tapes, texts, emails, and other documents.

If you think the case is going to based on Cohen alone, please continue to believe that as everyone likes a surprise.

WW