C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
Things get killed all the time. Things die, sometimes we do it on purpose. Murder is a charge for killing human beings. A fetus is not a human being.
Murder is a legal term. It is an unlawful killing. You can murder a dog.
Dehumanizing ones victim is an old technique. You claim the unborn are not human, what would you claim they are? Rats? Cockroaches? I believe these were terms others used when they killed those they found inconvenient.
A fetus is human - only a ghoul claims otherwise - DNA makes it irrefutable that they are human. A fetus is alive, a living human with distinct and measurable brain and heart activity - the definition of life by the AMA.
The desire of ghouls to kill, does not alter medical fact. Each year the support for abortion declines. As Americans learn more about medical and scientific fact, the support for abortion declines, as well it should. The lies told by ghouls are in glaring contrast to scientific fact.
Because you ghouls cannot offer a rational and factual argument to support taking life, you find support for you decline.
How ignorant must one be to claim the HUMAN fetus is not HUMAN?
And how is it a right to privacy, to murder your unborn child? The act of abortion is hardly private.
These pro-abort people have been so effectively brainwashed by the elite left, that they are incapable of reason.
This from a crazed SC Justice:
Frankly, I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
She is one sick baby killing eugenicist.
Preventing pregnancy is one of the easiest and cheapest things one can EVER do. Yet we are told women and men can't do the easy thing, so...the women is granted the right to murder her child should she become pregnant...and the father has no rights in the matter.
This has been explained to you many times, it can't be helped that you insist on remaining willfully ignorant.
The Constitution prohibits the state from interfering in private matters such as the decision to have a child or not, and wisely and appropriately so.
Consequently, those opposed to abortion need to seek to find another solution to end the practice other than 'banning' abortion, a solution that comports with the Constitution and its case law.
What's telling about the issue is that those opposed to abortion should also be opposed to 'banning' abortion, as to do so will in no way bring an end to the practice abortion is a symptom of much more serious problems that can't be 'solved' by government sanctions.