Unkotare
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2011
- 129,821
- 24,909
- 2,180
How would you know if I read it?
Because you told me you didn’t, dumbass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How would you know if I read it?
No, I told you I skimmed it. I don't think you've read it at all because you don't seem to be able to discuss it or the fact that it pretty much admits that there are various moral theories suggesting there is no consensus on some sort of objective morality.Because you told me you didn’t, dumbass.
No one thinks specks are human beings. Speck. Human. Speck. Human. Different things. My cat knows that specks aren't human beings, and she has a brain the size of a walnut. Your brain is presumably larger, so you know it too. You're just lying about it. You're down on your knees gobbling the knob of the Lord of Lies.IMAGINE, humanizing a human being?!
No, I told you I skimmed it. ....
I thought that about the level of discussion you were prepared to have about your own link.
...f discussion you were prepared to have about your own link. ...
I've read more of it than you have as evidenced by your inability to discuss any part of it including the very first paragraph where it admits there is no consensus on morality making it by definition, subjective.Which you haven't read, because you can't.
Unkotare was trying to argue abortion is objectively immoral but is having trouble proving morality is objective to begin with.guess Unk and Curried are duking it out
about what, I don't know...
SO...how many unwanted children have YOU adopted?I didn't have too strong of an opinion on the matter until I saw a presentation from a man that used to perform abortions (having done thousands) and detailing the steps involved. After that, I changed to pro life.
Desist with your lying faggotry, filthy pro-abort scum.No one thinks specks are human beings. Speck. Human. Speck. Human. Different things. My cat knows that specks aren't human beings, and she has a brain the size of a walnut. Your brain is presumably larger, so you know it too. You're just lying about it. You're down on your knees gobbling the knob of the Lord of Lies.
Why do you lie?
1. The rest of your fascist cult is lying. Being a gutless authoritarian follower, you always do what your cult orders.
2. It gives you justification to use violence to implement your fascist utopia.
3. You get a sick pervy tingle up your leg when you lie.
A strong majority of the USA, all of the non-perv decent people, they define you as a shit human. You're helping Democrats all over win elections, so please keep up your disgusting behavior.
Reality is objective.Unkotare was trying to argue abortion is objectively immoral but is having trouble proving morality is objective to begin with.
Don't deny it. You were typing that one-handed.Desist with your lying faggotry, filthy pro-abort scum.
Your feelings aren't.Reality is objective.
Thank you anesthesia. What kind of monster longs for the days of back ally coat hanger abortions without any pain medication? You got to numb that cooch before you try and get in there with some forceps to rip that little critter out by its neck.Reality: Humans are slaughtered in the womb and we have become numb to it all, society that is.
I don't give a shit what makes imaginary baby Jesus cry.But God does not change and He doesn't want His little ones murdered.
The vast majority of this country and the world are okay with abortion the only question is where to draw the line. God is dead. His rules were too rigid and so the is bastard had to go.If people can't get off their lazy asses and vote for life... they deserve whatever it is they are afraid of...
What kind of monster longs for the days of back ally coat hanger abortions without any pain medication? You got to numb that cooch before you try and get in there with some forceps to rip that little critter out by its neck.
If you're a non viable fetus, you don't have a right to gestate inside an unwilling woman. Rights have limits. Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose. If you can't lay a finger on me without my consent, what makes you think you can gestate inside a woman's without hers?wow... absolutely unbelievable, and un-self-aware...
You speak of pain as if it only matters depending on the person experiencing it (subjective thinking). If it is someone YOU (& or the supposed majority) couldn't care less about (the unborn, in this case), you (&/or they) are a-ok with pain! Bring on the pain!
Only women experiencing pain... Only adult females feeling pain seems to concern you (key words: seems to).
Well, that shows you are an elitist and one who very, very likely couldn't care less even about THEIR pain. It's just a way to get someone over to your side (hackery).
But we should not be terribly surprised.... at the inhuman garbage the left comes up with
That article is 10 years old"Pro-choice" people become Pro-life after learning about abortion in the USA
OK, I'll be right back, forgot to get the link first.. But one "link" I can provide right now is a book I started to read... not sure I will finish it.. AWFUL
about the abortionist convicted of 7 counts (or more?) of murder. This is an unbelievable story... Most abortionists follow the law on the cut-off point for doing an abortion. Not Gosnell. He violated every abortion & health regulation known to the state of Pennsylvania
![]()
Doctor Kermit Gosnell found guilty of murdering infants in late-term abortions
A Philadelphia doctor was found guilty Monday of murdering three babies born alive in an abortion clinic, Fox News confirms. He was acquitted in the fourth baby's death, and found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the overdose death of an adult patient.www.foxnews.com
"Pro-choice" JURORS became more Pro-life after learning about abortion in the trial of this sick monster, who brought live babies out of the womb (he could have killed them inside, as most abortionists do) and THEN stabbing them in the neck.
The jurors didn't all necessarily become 100% pro life in that they began to support all human life from conception until death (save the death penalty), but they became more in favor of restrictions after a particular age of gestation, say 10 weeks or whatever...
maybe the woman should have been "unwilling" BEFORE there was a totally unique, un-repeatable, totally innocent, totally helpless... didn't-ask-to=be-conceivedIf you're a non viable fetus, you don't have a right to gestate inside an unwilling woman.