Progressive Governance Dehumanizes The Population

[Kondor3]

Progressivism = Bad governance?

Not to worry...

Progressives are now in a minority in both House and Senate...

And their tired old corrupt next-round standard bearer is not the shooo-in for the White House that they'd like to delude themselves into believing...

They've had their turn at-bat for a while...

Play-time's over, kiddies...

Time for the other guys to get a turn...

One can only hope that, in actuality, those 'other guys' are any different.

There is very little difference between the two nowadays.

Except for whom they wish to extort their money from.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Notice PoliticalChic completed ignored - willfully ignored - post 34 and chose to post a captious one from a post in which I made a trivial mistake, in one short paragraph. The rest of the post she willfully ignored.

Yup....I'm pretty willful.

Let's continue the beating which I'm gleefully administering to you....

...and put a face on 'PROGRESSIVES.'

The lovely face of a major PROGRESSIVE, and an icon to the Left....Margaret Sanger.

1. It was in 1939 that Sanger's larger vision for dealing with the reproductive practices of black Americans emerged. After the January 1939 merger of her Clinical Research Bureau and the ABCL to form the Birth Control Federation of America, Dr. Clarence J. Gamble was selected to become the BCFA regional director for the South. Dr. Gamble, of the soap-manufacturing Procter and Gamble company, was no newcomer to Sanger's organization. He had previously served as director at large to the predecessor ABCL.

2. Gamble lost no time and drew up a memorandum in November 1939 entitled "Suggestion for Negro Project." Acknowledging that black leaders might regard birth control as an extermination plot, he suggested that black leaders be place in positions where it would appear that they were in charge, as it was at an Atlanta conference.


3. Sanger answered Gamble on Dec. 10. 1939, agreeing with the assessment. She wrote: "We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." In 1940, money for two "Negro Project" demonstration programs in southern states was donated by advertising magnate Albert D. Lasker and his wife, Mary. BlackGenocide.org The Truth About Margaret Sanger - Page Two


Know why this is significant?
From the OP:
...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

Looking at any of the totalitarian theories of leadership...and that includes Liberalism and Progressivism, and one can imagine their explanation as 'one must break some eggs to make an omelette.'


....especially if those are 'black' eggs, huh?

Sanger was anti-abortion, like you. Sanger never wanted to exterminate the 'Negro'.

The notable champion of the principles behind eugenics in the modern era is your hero Charles Murray.

As early as it is in the day....this post of yours is far and away the most absurd lie of the day, and ....no matter what else, or who else, follows,

...you have staked your claim as the most practiced and inveterate liar on the board.


But...the abject absurdity of both lies might move you into the category of "Most Insane."

What do you dispute, specifically? Jabbering monkey noises may be a protest, but they are not a substantive rebuttal.

"Sanger was anti-abortion, like you. Sanger never wanted to exterminate the 'Negro'.

The notable champion of the principles behind eugenics in the modern era is your hero Charles Murray."


I think you should consider doing that post as part of a set at the 'Ice House' comedy club on open mic night. You'd kill!

 

[guno]

Notice PoliticalChic completed ignored - willfully ignored - post 34 and chose to post a captious one from a post in which I made a trivial mistake, in one short paragraph. The rest of the post she willfully ignored.

Yup....I'm pretty willful.

Let's continue the beating which I'm gleefully administering to you....

...and put a face on 'PROGRESSIVES.'

The lovely face of a major PROGRESSIVE, and an icon to the Left....Margaret Sanger.

1. It was in 1939 that Sanger's larger vision for dealing with the reproductive practices of black Americans emerged. After the January 1939 merger of her Clinical Research Bureau and the ABCL to form the Birth Control Federation of America, Dr. Clarence J. Gamble was selected to become the BCFA regional director for the South. Dr. Gamble, of the soap-manufacturing Procter and Gamble company, was no newcomer to Sanger's organization. He had previously served as director at large to the predecessor ABCL.

2. Gamble lost no time and drew up a memorandum in November 1939 entitled "Suggestion for Negro Project." Acknowledging that black leaders might regard birth control as an extermination plot, he suggested that black leaders be place in positions where it would appear that they were in charge, as it was at an Atlanta conference.


3. Sanger answered Gamble on Dec. 10. 1939, agreeing with the assessment. She wrote: "We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." In 1940, money for two "Negro Project" demonstration programs in southern states was donated by advertising magnate Albert D. Lasker and his wife, Mary. BlackGenocide.org The Truth About Margaret Sanger - Page Two


Know why this is significant?
From the OP:
...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

Looking at any of the totalitarian theories of leadership...and that includes Liberalism and Progressivism, and one can imagine their explanation as 'one must break some eggs to make an omelette.'


....especially if those are 'black' eggs, huh?

Sanger was anti-abortion, like you. Sanger never wanted to exterminate the 'Negro'.

The notable champion of the principles behind eugenics in the modern era is your hero Charles Murray.

As early as it is in the day....this post of yours is far and away the most absurd lie of the day, and ....no matter what else, or who else, follows,

...you have staked your claim as the most practiced and inveterate liar on the board.


But...the abject absurdity of both lies might move you into the category of "Most Insane."

What do you dispute, specifically? Jabbering monkey noises may be a protest, but they are not a substantive rebuttal.

"Sanger was anti-abortion, like you. Sanger never wanted to exterminate the 'Negro'.

The notable champion of the principles behind eugenics in the modern era is your hero Charles Murray."


I think you should consider doing that post as part of a set at the 'Ice House' comedy club on open mic night. You'd kill!

Gee another Michelle Malkin wannabe post

 

[PoliticalChic]

"ISIS Suspect Plotted to Bring Syrian Jihadis to US via Mexico
Prosecutors say Guled Ali Omar, 21, wanted to open up routes to the U.S. through Mexico so Syrian jihadis could attack America."
ISIS Suspect Plotted to Bring Syrian Jihadis to US via Mexico | Clarion Project


"Obama Plans to Bring Thousands More Syrian Refugees into the U.S."
Obama Plans to Bring Thousands More Syrian Refugees into the U.S. - Breitbart

 

[SuperDemocrat]

What is missing in political debates is the idea that truth exist somewhere among our ideas that we believe in. It should drive everyone insane.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What is missing in political debates is the idea that truth exist somewhere among our ideas that we believe in. It should drive everyone insane.

"It should drive everyone insane."

In that case, the Liberals have quite a head start.

 

[NYcarbineer]

1. While the most obvious difference between conservatives and progressives is the willingness of the latter to accept patently false ideas as the basis for their worldview.
In numberous cases, even the most effortless research would show that their solutions don't work.....
Si mundus vult decipi, ergodecipiatur. ( If the world wants to be deceived, so let it be deceived)



...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

Looking at any of the totalitarian theories of leadership...and that includes Liberalism and Progressivism, and one can imagine their explanation as 'one must break some eggs to make an omelette.'


. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.





One of my favorite conservative intellectuals is Theodore Dalrymple. I've posted his work often. And in his recent interview he once again focuses on the detriments with which Progressives burden society.

2. " Progressive Ideology ‘Dehumanizes The Population’

...in which he warns America to stop its intellectual dishonesty to restore a healthy society. He thinks his own country is incentivizing the decline of its culture with policies and has insightful suggestions for America, if we will only listen. ... says the West is “too weak-willed,” “accepts obvious untruths” and “treats people as objects.” In this 28-minute video interview with The Daily Caller, he says “the intellectual dishonesty of the West is the greatest threat – we can’t say what we really think.”

.He discusses family breakdown where serial step-parenting replaces fatherhood, graffiti, and the de-christianizing of a society.

Dalrymple sees no easy solutions but warns that waiting for the political “man on the white horse” is unrealistic. Rather, he says, culture is where a country will be saved.

He ends the interview explaining that the road to hell is paved with bad intentions masquerading as good ones."
Conservative Intellectual Progressive Ideology Dehumanizes The Population VIDEO The Daily Caller



Here is the vid....Throughout the thread, I'll quote it...perhaps not verbatim, for those who haven't the time to watch it in its entirety.
You can monitor it here:

Given that you've turned into a rightwing propaganda dispenser robot, I'd say you've misplaced your charges of dehumanization.