Progressive Governance Dehumanizes The Population

[PoliticalChic]

...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

How many progressive in America can you name who want to slaughter anyone who doesn't agree with them?

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Please don't feed the troll.

I never use the term 'troll.'

Seems to mean 'folks I hate interacting with, because they always prove me wrong."

Seems to fit your post, and your plea to other Liberals.


Cower away, Liberals!

 

[PoliticalChic]

The society that Progressives have given us, by said dehumanization, leaves many unfulfilled. Earlier, some sought communism as fulfillment....now there are those who run off to fight for Islamofascism in search of same.

5. How does ISIS compare with the rewards offered by Western society? Western civilization has left behind its religious belief and its sacred text to place its trust, not in religious certainties, but in "open discussion, trial and error, and the ubiquitousness of doubt." Scruton, "The West And The Rest."



Perhaps not unexpected, as the West offers freedoms unheard of in Islamic countries, 70% of the world's refugees are Muslims fleeing from places where their religion is the official doctrine. They flee to the West, for opportunity, and personal safety, as well as said freedom.

But...the oddity is that, while settling in the West, many of these refugees begin to develop a hatred for their new home...and plan to take revenge on it with only its final destruction as the fitting punishment.

Even less understandable, those Muslims who settle and assimilate often have children, brought up in the West, yet identify as opposition to it, and desire its annihilation.

Why do British and American children join up with ISIS and commit the most horrific acts? Dalrymple ascribes it to a search for significance and meaning, elements missing from the Progressive societies in which they've grown up.

What's missing? The humanity from Progressive governance. It is the only possible result when one eradicates sense of the individual in favor of the collective.



The same search took many to dabble with Marxism before the downfall of it's practice. There are people who find violence innervating....especially when joined to a messianic purpose.

He claimed, at his nomination, that this would be “the moment when the rise of the oceans would begin to slow and our planet begin to heal.” Barack Obama’s victory speech, June 3, 2008 The day will come when we look back at this display of hubris and narcissism, and the complicity of the public which found him more popular than Jesus Christ, Martin Luther King, and Mother Teresa (January 2009 poll found in ‘Christianity Today,’ February 22, 2009) as astounding.



Remember all the gullible Progressives and Liberals who referred to Barack Hussein Obama as 'Jesus,' 'savior,' and 'messiah'? More proof of their he willingness to accept patently false ideas as the basis for their worldview.

 

[Mad Scientist]

Progressive Governments USE Gays (AMONG OTHER THINGS) to breakdown the family unit and assert more control over society.

If gays were smart they'd support traditional families because THAT is what gave birth to THEM.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Progressive Governments USE Gays (AMONG OTHER THINGS) to breakdown the family unit and assert more control over society.

If gays were smart they'd support traditional families because THAT is what gave birth to THEM.

Your post reminded me of this...

1. Democrats love using the tax code to enact lots of special-interest goodies with great appeal to suburban soccer moms but of absolutely no use to most gays, such as

a. Child tax credits

b. Tuition tax credits

c. Child-care credits

d. Education savings accounts

e. Student loans

f. The Family and Medical Leave Act

g. There is only one issue more important to Democrats than raising taxes, and that is keeping abortion legal at all stages of pregnancy. This is probably not a big issue for most gays.

Coulter

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. There is a condition found, not only one segment of the population identifying with ISIS, but in the riots we see with far too much regularity.....both center on violence.

Violence is certainly commonplace in society, and is associated with the dehumanization....and the direction that Progressivism/Liberalism has taken society, Part of the Progressive concept is the view that there should no longer be a traditional structure that there once was between men and women: no formality, no contract, no sense of obligation...and this comes from the radicalization of the 1960s.

The doctrine has become that 'feelings' are the primary determinism....not responsibility, consideration of the future, consideration for children brought into the world....

... instead, 'one-night stands,' 'the hook-up generation,' 'the prevalence of divorce and the 'diminution of marriage.'

This view reduces morality to personal taste: “Whatever works for you.” Without tradition, there is no truth with which to compare one's actions; this is moral relativism, or postmodernism.

One more element of the inheritance Progressivism has left.

 

[BlindBoo]

LOL, cons are much more willing and able to accept patently false and insane ideas. My god, just look at Faux parading around as a News organization......Then check out their echo Chamber, where the lies become truly insane.

 

[NYcarbineer]

... instead, 'one-night stands,' 'the hook-up generation,' 'the prevalence of divorce and the 'diminution of marriage.'

.

Those all fall under the umbrella of 'individual liberty' that conservatives trumpet their support of every day.

 

[NYcarbineer]

... instead, 'one-night stands,' 'the hook-up generation,' 'the prevalence of divorce and the 'diminution of marriage.'

Oh my, such anger. Did someone catch someone else being naughty by any chance?

Is there a personal component to this distress?

Just asking, not assuming, not prying...

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Progressive policy has promoted both the break-up of family, and the absence of work, which gave self-respect and an identity. Liberal immigration policy amplifies same.

On top of that, welfare policy has proven not to work: the percentage of poor is essentially the same after 50 years of enforcement.

Charles Murray’s “Losing Ground” documented this effect using social indicators such as work, marriage, legitimacy, crime, and alcohol and drug abuse, and showing how the massive increase in government welfare programs worsened the problem.

A key to why ‘poverty’ ceased to decline almost as soon as the ‘War on Poverty’ began, is that the poor and lower-income population stopped working, and this led to the other deteriorating social conditions Murray cites. In 1960, almost 2/3 of lowest-income households were headed by persons who worked. http://www2.census.gov/prod2/popscan/p60-080.pdf

By 1991, this number was down to only one third….and only 11% working full time. Nor was this due to being unable to find work, as the ‘80’s and ‘90’s were boom times.



[The results for husbands show that the combination of negative income tax plans tested in SIME/DIME — which, as already mentioned, represents on average a relatively generous cash transfer program with a guarantee of 115% of the poverty line and a tax rate of 50% — has a significant negative effect on hours worked per year. Overview of the Final Report of the SIME DIME Report]

a. Further results: dissolution of families: “This conclusion was unambiguously unfavorable to advocates of a negative income tax that would cover married couples, for two important reasons. First, increased marital breakups among the poor would increase the numbers on welfare and the amount of transfer payments, principally because the separated wife and children would receive higher transfer payments.

Second, marital dissolutions and the usual accompanying absence of fathers from households with children are generally considered unfavorable outcomes regardless of whether or not the welfare rolls increase.” http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/conf/conf30/conf30c.pdf



Since productive activity not making any economic sense because of the work disincentives of the welfare plantation, other kinds of activities proliferate: drug and alcohol abuse, crime, recreational sex, illegitimacy, and family breakup are the new social norms, as does the culture of violence.

While the 'welfare state' increases dehumanization....it does not make it inevitable....but it certainly doesn't cure poverty.

Yet....50 years of endorsing failure.......Progressives are still 100% behind it.
As per the OP.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As per Dalrymple's definition of cultural decline.....well, welcome to the Big Apple!


8. "Asked about symptoms of a culture’s decline, Dalrymple speaks of his own community and says he can tell when the simplest problems, such as public drunkenness, become seemingly unsolvable to the local council." Conservative Intellectual Progressive Ideology Dehumanizes The Population VIDEO The Daily Caller



How appropriate.

NYC has committed almost as great an error in electing a neo-Marxist as mayor, as the nation has in Obama.....

...and this Liberal adminitrtion actually desires to increase these sort of problems:


" EXCLUSIVE: NYC City Council in talks to decriminalize minor offenses like open container and public urination

... offenses under consideration are public consumption of alcohol, public urination, bicycling on the sidewalk, being in a park after dark, failure to obey a park sign, littering and unreasonable noise." EXCLUSIVE NYC looks to decriminalize minor offenses - NY Daily News


Yet....there are absolute imbeciles who will pull the lever for petty tyrants who want to decrease the quality of life!!!!!


And that's a pretty good definition of dehumanizing the entire city.


Western civilization, for whatever reason, has embarked on a journey to the abyss....and it's become a one-way street.

 

[Wry Catcher]

...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

How many progressive in America can you name who want to slaughter anyone who doesn't agree with them?

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

Progressives are what"?


House GOP Committee Chairs Will All Be White Men In Next Congress

40 Threats to A Woman s Right to Decide Whether to Have an Abortion National Women s Law Center

Fighting Voter Suppression American Civil Liberties Union

Republican voter suppression rationales Why voter integrity is nonsense.

Progressive began to demand equal rights for women as early as 1923, see the history below and who ultimately opposed it (hint, it wasn't the progressives):

See:


"Arguments by ERA opponents such as Phyllis Schlafly, right-wing leader of the Eagle Forum/STOP ERA, played on the same fears that had generated female opposition to woman suffrage. Anti-ERA organizers claimed that the ERA would deny woman's right to be supported by her husband, privacy rights would be overturned, women would be sent into combat, and abortion rights and homosexual marriages would be upheld. Opponents surfaced from other traditional sectors as well. States'-rights advocates said the ERA was a federal power grab, and business interests such as the insurance industry opposed a measure they believed would cost them money. Opposition to the ERA was also organized by fundamentalist religious groups."

 

[PoliticalChic]

...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

How many progressive in America can you name who want to slaughter anyone who doesn't agree with them?

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

Progressives are what"?


House GOP Committee Chairs Will All Be White Men In Next Congress

40 Threats to A Woman s Right to Decide Whether to Have an Abortion National Women s Law Center

Fighting Voter Suppression American Civil Liberties Union

Republican voter suppression rationales Why voter integrity is nonsense.

Progressive began to demand equal rights for women as early as 1923, see the history below and who ultimately opposed it (hint, it wasn't the progressives):

See:


"Arguments by ERA opponents such as Phyllis Schlafly, right-wing leader of the Eagle Forum/STOP ERA, played on the same fears that had generated female opposition to woman suffrage. Anti-ERA organizers claimed that the ERA would deny woman's right to be supported by her husband, privacy rights would be overturned, women would be sent into combat, and abortion rights and homosexual marriages would be upheld. Opponents surfaced from other traditional sectors as well. States'-rights advocates said the ERA was a federal power grab, and business interests such as the insurance industry opposed a measure they believed would cost them money. Opposition to the ERA was also organized by fundamentalist religious groups."

Democrats opposed women's suffrage...most especially PROGRESSIVE President Woodrow Wilson.

In fact..his PROGRESSIVE party filibustered against giving women the vote.

Republicans are responsible for bringing it up...and for passing it.


As usual, your posts provide the eternal puzzle when analyzing Liberal's offerings: are you ignorant, or do you know the truth...and you're lying.

Which is it?



BTW....did you notice that, unlike your post, mine actually responded to the post it linked.
Something wrong with you?

 

[Wry Catcher]

How many progressive in America can you name who want to slaughter anyone who doesn't agree with them?

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

Progressives are what"?


House GOP Committee Chairs Will All Be White Men In Next Congress

40 Threats to A Woman s Right to Decide Whether to Have an Abortion National Women s Law Center

Fighting Voter Suppression American Civil Liberties Union

Republican voter suppression rationales Why voter integrity is nonsense.

Progressive began to demand equal rights for women as early as 1923, see the history below and who ultimately opposed it (hint, it wasn't the progressives):

See:


"Arguments by ERA opponents such as Phyllis Schlafly, right-wing leader of the Eagle Forum/STOP ERA, played on the same fears that had generated female opposition to woman suffrage. Anti-ERA organizers claimed that the ERA would deny woman's right to be supported by her husband, privacy rights would be overturned, women would be sent into combat, and abortion rights and homosexual marriages would be upheld. Opponents surfaced from other traditional sectors as well. States'-rights advocates said the ERA was a federal power grab, and business interests such as the insurance industry opposed a measure they believed would cost them money. Opposition to the ERA was also organized by fundamentalist religious groups."

Democrats opposed women's suffrage...most especially PROGRESSIVE President Woodrow Wilson.

In fact..his PROGRESSIVE party filibustered against giving women the vote.

Republicans are responsible for bringing it up...and for passing it.


As usual, your posts provide the eternal puzzle when analyzing Liberal's offerings: are you ignorant, or do you know the truth...and you're lying.

Which is it?

Democrats also favored slavery ... but then JFK & LBJ moved the D Party squarely in the direction of toward civil rights, and by the time the ERA was proposed, it was the Republican's who opposed this Amendment:

• Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
• Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
• Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

and it was the Democratic Party who supported and passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on January 29, 2009 signed by President Obama.

And it is the Republican Party opposed to same sex marrige, and the D Party in support; and it is the R Party working to suppress the right to vote, and the D Party supporting universal sufferage.

But many thanks for proving once again your basic dishonesty. Stating the Democratic Party of today is the same as it once was, and the Republican Party remains the Party of Lincoln and TR is absolute bullshit. I guess you never learned any of this in school, or, are simply a lying partisan hack.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

Progressives are what"?


House GOP Committee Chairs Will All Be White Men In Next Congress

40 Threats to A Woman s Right to Decide Whether to Have an Abortion National Women s Law Center

Fighting Voter Suppression American Civil Liberties Union

Republican voter suppression rationales Why voter integrity is nonsense.

Progressive began to demand equal rights for women as early as 1923, see the history below and who ultimately opposed it (hint, it wasn't the progressives):

See:


"Arguments by ERA opponents such as Phyllis Schlafly, right-wing leader of the Eagle Forum/STOP ERA, played on the same fears that had generated female opposition to woman suffrage. Anti-ERA organizers claimed that the ERA would deny woman's right to be supported by her husband, privacy rights would be overturned, women would be sent into combat, and abortion rights and homosexual marriages would be upheld. Opponents surfaced from other traditional sectors as well. States'-rights advocates said the ERA was a federal power grab, and business interests such as the insurance industry opposed a measure they believed would cost them money. Opposition to the ERA was also organized by fundamentalist religious groups."

Democrats opposed women's suffrage...most especially PROGRESSIVE President Woodrow Wilson.

In fact..his PROGRESSIVE party filibustered against giving women the vote.

Republicans are responsible for bringing it up...and for passing it.


As usual, your posts provide the eternal puzzle when analyzing Liberal's offerings: are you ignorant, or do you know the truth...and you're lying.

Which is it?

Democrats also favored slavery ... but then JFK & LBJ

Again....linked to a post and then forgot to respond to the post.


Your mental ability is clearly on the level of a Rhino....it will charge, then forget why it charged,,,,and simply wander off.



I see why you wear one of those medical alert bracelets with your name and address on it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Ooo....let me do one!!!


The Progressive Legacy: "more than 60,000 Americans endured involuntary sterilization."
Social Origins of Eugenics

 

[PoliticalChic]

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

Progressives are what"?


House GOP Committee Chairs Will All Be White Men In Next Congress

40 Threats to A Woman s Right to Decide Whether to Have an Abortion National Women s Law Center

Fighting Voter Suppression American Civil Liberties Union

Republican voter suppression rationales Why voter integrity is nonsense.

Progressive began to demand equal rights for women as early as 1923, see the history below and who ultimately opposed it (hint, it wasn't the progressives):

See:


"Arguments by ERA opponents such as Phyllis Schlafly, right-wing leader of the Eagle Forum/STOP ERA, played on the same fears that had generated female opposition to woman suffrage. Anti-ERA organizers claimed that the ERA would deny woman's right to be supported by her husband, privacy rights would be overturned, women would be sent into combat, and abortion rights and homosexual marriages would be upheld. Opponents surfaced from other traditional sectors as well. States'-rights advocates said the ERA was a federal power grab, and business interests such as the insurance industry opposed a measure they believed would cost them money. Opposition to the ERA was also organized by fundamentalist religious groups."

Democrats opposed women's suffrage...most especially PROGRESSIVE President Woodrow Wilson.

In fact..his PROGRESSIVE party filibustered against giving women the vote.

Republicans are responsible for bringing it up...and for passing it.


As usual, your posts provide the eternal puzzle when analyzing Liberal's offerings: are you ignorant, or do you know the truth...and you're lying.

Which is it?

Democrats also favored slavery ... but then JFK & LBJ moved the D Party squarely in the direction of toward civil rights, and by the time the ERA was proposed, it was the Republican's who opposed this Amendment:

• Section 1. Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.
• Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
• Section 3. This amendment shall take effect two years after the date of ratification.

and it was the Democratic Party who supported and passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act on January 29, 2009 signed by President Obama.

And it is the Republican Party opposed to same sex marrige, and the D Party in support; and it is the R Party working to suppress the right to vote, and the D Party supporting universal sufferage.

But many thanks for proving once again your basic dishonesty. Stating the Democratic Party of today is the same as it once was, and the Republican Party remains the Party of Lincoln and TR is absolute bullshit. I guess you never learned any of this in school, or, are simply a lying partisan hack.

You posted this: "Progressive began to demand equal rights for women as early as 1923, see the history below and who ultimately opposed it (hint, it wasn't the progressives):"

I eviscerated that post,,.and you ran way from it.


So I win, huh?:


This must be why you attempted to dissuade others from engaging in these threads: the constant losing doesn't appeal to Liberals.

 

[Clementine]

Progressives hate all human life, that's why they are history's most prolific mass murderers. What's John Wayne Gacy compared to progressive idols Stalin and Mao?

They reveal their narcissism when they create their policies. While they see the masses as lab rats to experiment with, they still see themselves as superior human beings with feelings and needs. The masses are expendable. They consider themselves as vital and more intelligent than others.

I see that in the way they have treated black people for decades. They are simply a group to be manipulated for their own purposes and anyone who calls them out is accused of racism.

Several liberals have made comments about how old people have a duty to die. Old people are no longer useful and just take up space and gobble up resources while giving nothing in return.

They would prefer to abort all babies that aren't perfect. I think liberals would adopt extreme policies regarding people having children. I think they would force people to apply and not be allowed to reproduce without permission. Obama's science czar has long wanted to put sterilization agents in the drinking water supply to curb population growth. Of course, their ideas only apply to the common people and adversaries. The wannabe dictators see themselves as some kind of royalty that should be preserved while the average citizens are insects. They would only keep the intelligent people who could keep things going and eliminate those with little to contribute.

This ideology has been around for ages and many dictators attempted to create the "perfect" world. Of course, a perfect world wouldn't have a single dictator in it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ooo....let me do one!!!


The Progressive Legacy: "more than 60,000 Americans endured involuntary sterilization."
Social Origins of Eugenics

Progressive governance has worked out pretty well here

Proof that Progressives accept patently false ideas.

You're here aren't you? Conservatives wanted to keep the Asians out too, remember?

 

[NYcarbineer]

...But the most salient difference between the two views is the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug.

How many progressive in America can you name who want to slaughter anyone who doesn't agree with them?

As Goldberg describes..."The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, ..."
....but the desire to force others to dance to the Progressives jig is still there.



4. This determinism is the impetus for the totalitarian mechanism: coercion.

If you convince yourself that 'determinism' is the guiding principle of other people's lives, and they can not behave other than the way that they do...then it is up to you to force them to behave in the way you wish them to.


And this is a prime example of the dehumanizing of the citizenry, because, no matter how poor, or how poorly educated they are, human beings are capable of making independent judgments: that's what being a human being is.



In his experience with heroin addicts, Dalrymple found this sort of determinism. When asked why they began taking heroin...the explanation sounded like the law of gravity: "I fell in with the wrong crowd."

Of course....none of these individuals described themselves as "the wrong crowd."

So...the blame is the determinism of a sort of 'social gravity,' rather than the fact that they made conscious decisions, wanted to be in that group, and do what that group did.



Of course, the Progressives who are able to provide benefits for them go along with the fable as though it were true. In effect, saying "You are completely innocent ...you are a victim."

So you can name 'none'.

Why did you say it then? Why try to claim that progressives want to kill everyone if you know that's an outright lie?

Speaking of lying......you are.

It said "the acceptance of the slaughter of those who don't agree, or don't choose to follow their doctrines, with a shrug."


Your vocabulary lesson:
Acceptance: "the action or process of being received as adequate or suitable, typically to be admitted into a group."

FDR bonded with Stalin, and, of course, FDR is a god to you Progressives/Liberals/Democrats.


Let me remind you.....I never lie.

Ok, then name the Progressives who accept the slaughter of those who disagree with Progressivism.