Proof that Obama is not the smartest person in the room.

[BobPlumb]

The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?

[ame=http://youtu.be/sgpnE9NtpYo]3000 percent.wmv - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Politico]

I know I am smarter than him. You needed proof?

 

[BobPlumb]

I know I am smarter than him. You needed proof?

Obama won reelection. Need I say more?

 

[Sallow]

Seriously sucks to be a right winger now adays.

 

[BobPlumb]

Seriously sucks to be a right winger now adays.

Perhaps some of you left wingers will point out the 3000% reduction in premiums that Obama promised employers?

 

[Sallow]

Seriously sucks to be a right winger now adays.

Perhaps some of you left wingers will point out the 3000% reduction in premiums that Obama promised employers?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZezfjWox5s]Sue Lowden's plan to pay for health care? "Bring a chicken to the doctor" - YouTube[/ame]

How many chickens would that be?

 

[shart_attack]

The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?

Even though I'm still new here and hence, aren't yet familiar with you, I've little to no doubt that you well know the answer that question, man.

Remember when Nancy Pelosi told Bill O'Reilly that he was "disrespectful" to the president during their mano-y-mano Super Bowl interview?

Awwwwww, wasn't that just so cute?

Now, let's open up our memory banks and reflect back just a bit further.

Remember all the times Ms. Pelosi and her crew of fellow blue Washington jackwads were "disrespectful" (her word, not mine) to President George W. Bush? Too many times to count, unless we're both writing our doctoral dissertations right now, huh?

The last person in the world who should have the right to call anyone else "disrespectful"—toward the president, toward pretty much just everyone in the entirety of the world in general—is a Democrat.

That's the thing with liberals: they think their stuff don't stink. They like to think they know what's best for all of us, and they say so in the most condescending manners imaginable.

And we both know that most of the (I would've used the term mainstream right here just a few years ago; but nope, not anymore) American media are Obama's driving wheel.

Our favorite dundering, doltish Obama dittoheads on tv are never going to ask him that question, or any other pointed "disrespectful" question designed to get to the bottom of any given Obama Administration fiasco.

May as well get used to it: that's just the way it is. And it ain't gonna change.

But glass half-full: given the routine mistakes President Obama makes, it should be fairly obvious to most of us now that he isn't the antichrist.

 

[Sallow]

The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?

Even though I'm still new here and hence, aren't yet familiar with you, I've little to no doubt that you well know the answer that question, man.

Remember when Nancy Pelosi told Bill O'Reilly that he was "disrespectful" to the president during their mano-y-mano Super Bowl interview?

Awwwwww, wasn't that just so cute?

Now, let's open up our memory banks and reflect back just a bit further.

Remember all the times Ms. Pelosi and her crew of fellow blue Washington jackwads were "disrespectful" (her word, not mine) to President George W. Bush? Too many times to count, unless we're both writing our doctoral dissertations right now, huh?

The last person in the world who should have the right to call anyone else "disrespectful"—toward the president, toward pretty much just everyone in the entirety of the world in general—is a Democrat.

That's the thing with liberals: they think their stuff don't stink. They like to think they know what's best for all of us, and they say so in the most condescending manners imaginable.

And we both know that most of the (I would've used the term mainstream right here just a few years ago; but nope, not anymore) American media are Obama's driving wheel.

Our favorite dundering, doltish Obama dittoheads on tv are never going to ask him that question, or any other pointed "disrespectful" question designed to get to the bottom of any given Obama Administration fiasco.

May as well get used to it: that's just the way it is.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Dr2FouPSY]Congressman Calls Obama "Tar Baby" - YouTube[/ame]

That happened to Bush, when,,exactly?

 

[BobPlumb]

The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?

Even though I'm still new here and hence, aren't yet familiar with you, I've little to no doubt that you well know the answer that question, man.

Remember when Nancy Pelosi told Bill O'Reilly that he was "disrespectful" to the president during their mano-y-mano Super Bowl interview?

Awwwwww, wasn't that just so cute?

Now, let's open up our memory banks and reflect back just a bit further.

Remember all the times Ms. Pelosi and her crew of fellow blue Washington jackwads were "disrespectful" (her word, not mine) to President George W. Bush? Too many times to count, unless we're both writing our doctoral dissertations right now, huh?

The last person in the world who should have the right to call anyone else "disrespectful"—toward the president, toward pretty much just everyone in the entirety of the world in general—is a Democrat.

That's the thing with liberals: they think their stuff don't stink. They like to think they know what's best for all of us, and they say so in the most condescending manners imaginable.

And we both know that most of the (I would've used the term mainstream right here just a few years ago; but nope, not anymore) American media are Obama's driving wheel.

Our favorite dundering, doltish Obama dittoheads on tv are never going to ask him that question, or any other pointed "disrespectful" question designed to get to the bottom of any given Obama Administration fiasco.

May as well get used to it: that's just the way it is. And it ain't gonna change.

But glass half-full: given the routine mistakes President Obama makes, it should be fairly obvious to most of us now that he isn't the antichrist.

Amen brother!

 

[BobPlumb]

The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?

Even though I'm still new here and hence, aren't yet familiar with you, I've little to no doubt that you well know the answer that question, man.

Remember when Nancy Pelosi told Bill O'Reilly that he was "disrespectful" to the president during their mano-y-mano Super Bowl interview?

Awwwwww, wasn't that just so cute?

Now, let's open up our memory banks and reflect back just a bit further.

Remember all the times Ms. Pelosi and her crew of fellow blue Washington jackwads were "disrespectful" (her word, not mine) to President George W. Bush? Too many times to count, unless we're both writing our doctoral dissertations right now, huh?

The last person in the world who should have the right to call anyone else "disrespectful"—toward the president, toward pretty much just everyone in the entirety of the world in general—is a Democrat.

That's the thing with liberals: they think their stuff don't stink. They like to think they know what's best for all of us, and they say so in the most condescending manners imaginable.

And we both know that most of the (I would've used the term mainstream right here just a few years ago; but nope, not anymore) American media are Obama's driving wheel.

Our favorite dundering, doltish Obama dittoheads on tv are never going to ask him that question, or any other pointed "disrespectful" question designed to get to the bottom of any given Obama Administration fiasco.

May as well get used to it: that's just the way it is.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Dr2FouPSY]Congressman Calls Obama "Tar Baby" - YouTube[/ame]

That happened to Bush, when,,exactly?

Still can't respond to the 3000% percent reduction in premiums I see!

 

[Politico]

I know I am smarter than him. You needed proof?

Obama won reelection. Need I say more?

Yes he did. I am still smarter. Your point?

 

[shart_attack]

The media gave Dan Quayle hell over the spelling of potato. The media gave Palin hell over stumbling over the question about what news papers she read. G. W. Bush got hell for not pronouncing nuclear correctly (and for many other things). Why hasn't the MSN given Obama hell for not understanding math?

Even though I'm still new here and hence, aren't yet familiar with you, I've little to no doubt that you well know the answer that question, man.

Remember when Nancy Pelosi told Bill O'Reilly that he was "disrespectful" to the president during their mano-y-mano Super Bowl interview?

Awwwwww, wasn't that just so cute?

Now, let's open up our memory banks and reflect back just a bit further.

Remember all the times Ms. Pelosi and her crew of fellow blue Washington jackwads were "disrespectful" (her word, not mine) to President George W. Bush? Too many times to count, unless we're both writing our doctoral dissertations right now, huh?

The last person in the world who should have the right to call anyone else "disrespectful"—toward the president, toward pretty much just everyone in the entirety of the world in general—is a Democrat.

That's the thing with liberals: they think their stuff don't stink. They like to think they know what's best for all of us, and they say so in the most condescending manners imaginable.

And we both know that most of the (I would've used the term mainstream right here just a few years ago; but nope, not anymore) American media are Obama's driving wheel.

Our favorite dundering, doltish Obama dittoheads on tv are never going to ask him that question, or any other pointed "disrespectful" question designed to get to the bottom of any given Obama Administration fiasco.

May as well get used to it: that's just the way it is.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Dr2FouPSY]Congressman Calls Obama "Tar Baby" - YouTube[/ame]

That happened to Bush, when,,exactly?

Are you really that uninformed — seriously???

If you are, I don't know why you're even hanging out here in Current Events. All you need to do is turn on your tv right now, this very second: Pelosi's gang of Democratic Party hit piece artists in the media are still doing that to Bush, SIX YEARS NOW SINCE HE LEFT OFFICE.

It is what they do, and sadly it seems, the only thing they can do.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Blaming Bush is not a solution. It is a cover that Liberals run to while trying to avoid Accountability. 8 years of this shit and where has it gotten US?

 

[shart_attack]

Here you go, Sallow. This is exactly the article about which I was thinking when I made that post. I can hardly believe I even found it still online, five-and-a-half years later:

By Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, The Wall Street Journal, Nov. 5, 2008—Earlier this year, 12,000 people in San Francisco signed a petition in support of a proposition on a local ballot to rename an Oceanside sewage plant after George W. Bush. The proposition is only one example of the classless disrespect many Americans have shown the president.

According to recent Gallup polls, the president's average approval rating is below 30% — down from his 90% approval in the wake of 9/11. Mr. Bush has endured relentless attacks from the left while facing abandonment from the right.

This is the price Mr. Bush is paying for trying to work with both Democrats and Republicans. During his 2004 victory speech, the president reached out to voters who supported his opponent, John Kerry, and said, "Today, I want to speak to every person who voted for my opponent. To make this nation stronger and better, I will need your support, and I will work to earn it. I will do all I can do to deserve your trust."

Those bipartisan efforts have been met with crushing resistance from both political parties.

The president's original Supreme Court choice of Harriet Miers alarmed Republicans, while his final nomination of Samuel Alito angered Democrats. His solutions to reform the immigration system alienated traditional conservatives, while his refusal to retreat in Iraq has enraged liberals who have unrealistic expectations about the challenges we face there.

It seems that no matter what Mr. Bush does, he is blamed for everything. He remains despised by the left while continuously disappointing the right.

Yet it should seem obvious that many of our country's current problems either existed long before Mr. Bush ever came to office, or are beyond his control. Perhaps if Americans stopped being so divisive, and congressional leaders came together to work with the president on some of these problems, he would actually have had a fighting chance of solving them.

Like the president said in his 2004 victory speech, "We have one country, one Constitution and one future that binds us. And when we come together and work together, there is no limit to the greatness of America."

To be sure, Mr. Bush is not completely alone. His low approval ratings put him in the good company of former Democratic President Harry S. Truman, whose own approval rating sank to 22% shortly before he left office. Despite Mr. Truman's low numbers, a 2005 Wall Street Journal poll found that he was ranked the seventh most popular president in history.

Just as Americans have gained perspective on how challenging Truman's presidency was in the wake of World War II, our country will recognize the hardship President Bush faced these past eight years — and how extraordinary it was that he accomplished what he did in the wake of the September 11 attacks.

The treatment President Bush has received from this country is nothing less than a disgrace. The attacks launched against him have been cruel and slanderous, proving to the world what little character and resolve we have. The president is not to blame for all these problems. He never lost faith in America or her people, and has tried his hardest to continue leading our nation during a very difficult time.

Our failure to stand by the one person who continued to stand by us has not gone unnoticed by our enemies. It has shown to the world how disloyal we can be when our president needed loyalty — a shameful display of arrogance and weakness that will haunt this nation long after Mr. Bush has left the White House.

The Treatment of Bush Has Been a Disgrace - WSJ.com

 

[BobPlumb]

I know I am smarter than him. You needed proof?

Obama won reelection. Need I say more?

Yes he did. I am still smarter. Your point?

Those people that voted for him need the proof. Do I really have to explain this to someone who is smarter than Obama?

 

[beagle9]

Obama won reelection. Need I say more?

Yes he did. I am still smarter. Your point?

Those people that voted for him need the proof. Do I really have to explain this to someone who is smarter than Obama?

Obama's just a super slick talking head, where as he is a snake/beast that the Americans are having to deal with today, and he has many heads a hissing, snarling and wailing around him like crazy (his cronies). His eyes are like the snake Kaa's in the famous children's book or movie "The Jungle Book", where as he has put the nation in a deep sleep or trance in order to have his government dine on them at it's will now.

 

[Rozman]

Has Obama ever give a speech where he wasn't surrounded by his people props?

 

[Rozman]

I see Obama going into the ministry when he's done acting like the President.
He can do one of those televised deals.
Big ratings evey Sunday.
Bigger paycheck as well.

He can be his own Reverend Wright!

 

[guno]

Seriously sucks to be a right winger now adays.

The slackjawed Knuckle draggers are still foaming at the mouth that their better beat them twice and the American people rejected them

 

[The Rabbi]

Seriously sucks to be a right winger now adays.

The slackjawed Knuckle draggers are still foaming at the mouth that their better beat them twice and the American people rejected them

It's amazing what fraudulent voting will get you.

ANyway, never mind the 3000% bullshit, I'm waiting to see reductions of 15-20% in my own premiums. Instead I've seen increases in my premiums.
Could it be Obama lied?