Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
11 guiltys...7 Acquited...4 Hung Jury and 3 other.
More or less and even split between jail and home.
OOOPS! Prosecution just objected with Defense's opening statement and the judge sustained. Sorry, Katzy. You are wrong. Judge just told the lame Defense that he needs to stick to evidence, not a story about his own damn family!
LMAO!!!!
WTF? You just said 'it hasn't started yet.' Sounds to me like it has started. And I don't believe the judge said 'damn.'
"Fucking punks....these assholes always get away" said George Zimmerman about Trayvon Martin. Opening remarks by the prosecution! Outstanding! I love this guy!
And guess what, the defense attorneys did not object. Double ooops!
Talking about "case closed".......
Only morons think those words are incriminating.
So tell us what smart people are to surmise from those comments. I'll be waiting to hear your brilliant explanation.
Um, no. If the prosecution is going with "he went in there intending to shoot someone" theory, which use of this statement implies, then thier case is actually WEAKER than we think.
This is a quote, Einstein. Not an opinion or conjecture.
This opening statement combined with the fact that Zimmerman's HOA rules forbade him from carrying a gun while on Neighborhood Watch is enough.
he is not on trial for breaking HOA rules
Only morons think those words are incriminating.
So tell us what smart people are to surmise from those comments. I'll be waiting to hear your brilliant explanation.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
"Fucking punks....these assholes always get away" said George Zimmerman about Trayvon Martin. Opening remarks by the prosecution! Outstanding! I love this guy!
And guess what, the defense attorneys did not object. Double ooops!
Talking about "case closed".......
Um, no. If the prosecution is going with "he went in there intending to shoot someone" theory, which use of this statement implies, then thier case is actually WEAKER than we think.
This is a quote, Einstein. Not an opinion or conjecture.
This opening statement combined with the fact that Zimmerman's HOA rules forbade him from carrying a gun while on Neighborhood Watch is enough.
This is a quote, Einstein. Not an opinion or conjecture.
This opening statement combined with the fact that Zimmerman's HOA rules forbade him from carrying a gun while on Neighborhood Watch is enough.
he is not on trial for breaking HOA rules
Yes, but this information, that he was breaking those rules, lends credence to the overall contention that his behavior was inappropriate.
You don't get a JD by osmosis. You know nothing.
I guess you would let your doctor's wife do surgery on you.
I doubt you even understand what an LLM is, but after living with him for 30 years, I have picked up a few pointers and attended more than a few trials, too. One was before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Google this::::: Marion Hammer was the first NRA prez who singularly rammed the Stand Your Ground law through Florida legislation in 2005 based on a lie: that she was "stalked in a parking garage by six men, one of whom wielded a "long-necked beer bottle" before she pulled out her .38 and aimed".
The rednecks in Florida ate it up like trained seals with fresh fish thrown at them. The SYG law is fatally flawed, it gives the person shooting the gun the convenient opportunity of firing first and asking questions later. And ironically it was drafted to protect white people from blacks, but looks like the law has backfired, no pun intended.
Yes, dear. I know what an LLM is. It is a master's in law. I have a doctorate, thankyouverymuch. That seems to be escaping you. And I am not the only one on here who has a JD. I just happen to know who they are and you do not. Just another area where your ignorance abounds.
And you are ignorant; you are an undeniable bigot; and you are making a complete and utter fool of yourself.
So tell us what smart people are to surmise from those comments. I'll be waiting to hear your brilliant explanation.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
he is not on trial for breaking HOA rules
Yes, but this information, that he was breaking those rules, lends credence to the overall contention that his behavior was inappropriate.
It doesn't lend credence to a damn thing. Furthermore, HOA's don't have authority to tell you can't carry a gun. Next you'll tell us they have rules against smoking on your own property.
HOW rules government the maintenance and design and use of your property. Carrying a gun isn't a use of your property.
So tell us what smart people are to surmise from those comments. I'll be waiting to hear your brilliant explanation.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
Husband is a trial attorney in Philadelphia. For over 25 years. Graduated from Georgetown with JD and LLM. I get my info from all the craziest sources, don't I?
You don't get a JD by osmosis. You know nothing.
I guess you would let your doctor's wife do surgery on you.
I doubt you even understand what an LLM is, but after living with him for 30 years, I have picked up a few pointers and attended more than a few trials, too. One was before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Google this::::: Marion Hammer was the first NRA prez who singularly rammed the Stand Your Ground law through Florida legislation in 2005 based on a lie: that she was "stalked in a parking garage by six men, one of whom wielded a "long-necked beer bottle" before she pulled out her .38 and aimed".
The rednecks in Florida ate it up like trained seals with fresh fish thrown at them. The SYG law is fatally flawed, it gives the person shooting the gun the convenient opportunity of firing first and asking questions later. And ironically it was drafted to protect white people from blacks, but looks like the law has backfired, no pun intended.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
What liberals don't seem to fathom is that lots of people have had encounters with punks like Treyvon and they are rooting for Zimmerman's acquittal.
I recall a news story when I lived in Tampa that described how the driver of a car reached into his glovebox, pulled out his Glock and blew away some punk who was trying to highjack his car. Everyone in my office cheered when they learned about that.
Yes, but this information, that he was breaking those rules, lends credence to the overall contention that his behavior was inappropriate.
It doesn't lend credence to a damn thing. Furthermore, HOA's don't have authority to tell you can't carry a gun. Next you'll tell us they have rules against smoking on your own property.
HOW rules government the maintenance and design and use of your property. Carrying a gun isn't a use of your property.
It doesn't matter whether it lends credence in your mind. What matters is if it will make the jurors go "Hmmmmm." And I think it will give them some food for thought, that's for sure.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
Wrong. Treyvon was the punk. Now he's a dead punk - a big improvement in my book.
It doesn't lend credence to a damn thing. Furthermore, HOA's don't have authority to tell you can't carry a gun. Next you'll tell us they have rules against smoking on your own property.
HOW rules government the maintenance and design and use of your property. Carrying a gun isn't a use of your property.
It doesn't matter whether it lends credence in your mind. What matters is if it will make the jurors go "Hmmmmm." And I think it will give them some food for thought, that's for sure.
I doubt it will affect their decision one way or the other. It proves exactly nothing.
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
Wrong. Treyvon was the punk. Now he's a dead punk - a big improvement in my book.
Wow. You are glad because an unarmed kid making a trip to the store for some candy and iced tea was provoked into some kind of encounter by a fucker with a gun and then shot dead. And you think that's a good thing.
Wow.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
Wrong. Treyvon was the punk. Now he's a dead punk - a big improvement in my book.
They surmise that Zimmerman doesn't like getting robbed by ghetto punks, and that judges always let them off with a slap on the wrist.
What rational person would disagree?
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
What liberals don't seem to fathom is that lots of people have had encounters with punks like Treyvon and they are rooting for Zimmerman's acquittal.
I recall a news story when I lived in Tampa that described how the driver of a car reached into his glovebox, pulled out his Glock and blew away some punk who was trying to highjack his car. Everyone in my office cheered when they learned about that.
I guess some people aren't getting that Zimmerman was the "punk" in this story. I sure don't want the likes of him running around my neighborhood at night.
What liberals don't seem to fathom is that lots of people have had encounters with punks like Treyvon and they are rooting for Zimmerman's acquittal.
I recall a news story when I lived in Tampa that described how the driver of a car reached into his glovebox, pulled out his Glock and blew away some punk who was trying to highjack his car. Everyone in my office cheered when they learned about that.
Yeah, well in my town some punks broke into a guy's house to steal the stash of weed is son had told them he had, and he managed to get to his gun and shoot and kill one of them while the other two ran away. And the police didn't charge him with anything, no charges for the shooting and no charges for having the weed.
And we all cheered that one. I get that. But that's not an equivalent scenario to what happened to Trayvon Martin. He wasn't stealing anyone's car or breaking into anyone's house. He was minding his own business and Zimmerman should have minded his own business...or let the police handle it.
