Doc1
Gold Member
So you are betting the president would allow Browder to be interviewed? Seems to me if it really would get to clear up if the GRU officials indicted did something wrong and get his political foe in hot water he would be for it. Or are you aware that the argument in this OP that Mueller is now free to interview the 12 Russians indicted is false, and that Putin conceded nothing, and that Trump has ZERO interest in the truth coming out? And with the truth I don't mean necessarily that Trump somehow was involved with Russia, (although that's not inconceivable) but the truth that Russia interfered with the elections. And that finding out the scope, the means and the probability they will do it again is in the public interest to find out.Let it play out, were I like one of our crazed Prog nuts I'd already have her guilty.
Technically it would be Browder's employees. Surely you want to know if the Hillary Campaign received laundered Russian money, right? You realize that we've been through this once, he indicted the Russian's and when they showed up he backed out of it. It's all just a show son.