Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
.
My point is that they never should have trusted their enemies to start with ...
Now their fate could be in the hands of others.
I in no way excluded the idea that the United States is still one of the Players and still has nuclear weapons.
.
You weren't around or in charge for any of those decisions, so that makes all this your opinion only....which is fine. However, you come off as pretty demented in your hatred of the US, or basically as just a regular ole liberal.We did not need to cross the Appalachians into the Ohio valley and violate treaties.
We did not need to forcibly displace the natives from Georgia, Alabama, Florida, etc., with the Trail of Tears.
We did not need murder Tecumseh with the Blackhawk wars.
We did not need to then violate treaties again and cross the Mississippi.
We did not need to then starve the natives into going to Canada by wiping out the buffalo.
And we did not just do it to the natives, we also lied and cheated the Spanish.
Like the Alamo was not a bunch of pioneer settlers, but mercenaries hired to deliberately start an incident so the US could illegally invade TX.
We did the same in CA.
We did it again with the fake "Remember the Maine" claim so we could invade Spanish colonial possessions like the Philippines, in the Spanish American War.
And we should not forget that the US is the only country barbaric enough to actually use nuclear weapons on innocent civilian populations, just to experiment.
You weren't around or in charge for any of those decisions, so that makes all this your opinion only....which is fine. However, you come off as pretty demented in your hatred of the US, or basically as just a regular ole liberal.
Most of the vietnamese killed were killed by the communists. Same in Iraq except muslims.Nonsense.
It is the US that murdered 3 million innocent Vietnamese, half a million innocent Iraqis, etc.
Putin comes off as lily white in comparison, because he did not break off negotiations, the Ukraine did.
And the US is not innocent either.
The Monroe Doctrine was an illegal attempt to keep all the western hemisphere resources for ourselves.
We joined WWI on the side of the criminal Allies, who were guilty of assassinating Archduke Ferdinand, his wife, and illegally invading Germany first.
We then illegally torpedoed German civilian shipping to make them surrender, so we could illegally confiscate German wealth.
Who is the biggest war criminal?
The US illegally invaded Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, etc.
Most of the vietnamese killed were killed by the communists. Same in Iraq except muslims.
The monroe doctrine was legal.
The allies did not kill Ferdinand or invade Germany until they surrendered.
The invasions of all those nations were legal except vietnam which we did not invade at all
Ho Chi Minh was communist from his earliest days we did help him but he was a dedicated communist long before seizing power.Totally and completely wrong.
First of all, Ho Chi Minh was never really communist, and only had to fall back on China and Russia helping them because after years of him trying to get the US to help, we refused.
Second is that Ho Chi Minh was wildly popular in Vietnam, and even Eisenhower admitted he would have gotten over 90% of the vote if we had allowed the plebiscite election that was supposed to have happened. So there would have been no one for the north to kill. We did all the killing, wiping out whole villages with napalm, or small arms like Mai Lai.
And with Iraq, most of the people killed were from sickness because we destroyed the utilities.
The Monroe Doctrine is totally illegal.
It claimed imperial ownership of 3 whole continents.
{...
A principle of US policy, originated by President James Monroe in 1823, that any intervention by external powers in the politics of the Americas is a potentially hostile act against the US.
...}
That is obviously illegal since Spain and Portugal has spent huge sums of money investing in South and Central American infrastructure. We had ZERO legal authority to claim any authority outside the US borders.
And wrong. While it was Princip who pulled the trigger, the Serbian Black Hand picked, trained, and armed him, under Russian orders. And YES, the first act of WWI was France invading southern Germany.
Read it for yourself. Germany was totally the innocent victim. The Treaty of Versailles stole half of Germany (East Prussia), Alsace Lorraine, African colonies, all their merchant fleet, all foreign factories, etc.
The Allies were total crooks.
Everyone knows you are a liar and no one believes a single thing you say.50,000 Americans. What a stupid lie.
And the worst part of it is that Putin can't conquer anything! He can't conquer nations like Stalin, Adolf Hitler and Sadam could, at least they could lead more with an iron fist. Putin is a war criminal that is too soft who can't lead or conquer anything, he just repeatedly fails. His history of invasions/ military excursions have been blunders and so disappointing. Look how poorly planned his current invasion of Ukraine is! About the worst planning you could ask for. All he does is fail and disappoint militarily. He can't conquer anything ! All this effort to invade and conquer Ukraine is ultimately just going be in the long run a huge failure that just leads his country into a great depression. He has like the whole world against him and has failed to secure any allies helping him with this invasion, besides Belarus which really is just an extension of Russian. So he is just a failure who is just doomed to fail again and drag his whole Russian economy to the ground.View attachment 607107
In the eyes of the world and almost certainly history, Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine on Thursday was an epic miscalculation, drawing comparisons to Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein for cold-blooded aggression that could challenge the world order and change its borders. The Russian leader appeared almost delusional in a pre-dawn speech from the Kremlin announcing a “special military operation” to “protect” Donbas, the eastern region where Russian-backed separatists have waged a war for eight years. Putin, instead, immediately ordered Russian tanks into Ukraine and air strikes on the capital and more than a dozen cities in a country of forty million people. “Peace on our continent has been shattered,” the nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg told reporters. “We now have war in Europe on a scale and of a type we thought belonged to history.” Putin’s “reckless” attack risks “countless innocent lives,” Stoltenberg warned.
Putin is now, at minimum, a pariah condemned by leaders across the world. “Putin is the aggressor. Putin chose this war,” President Biden said in a speech to the nation announcing new sanctions on Russian financial institutions and élites. He charged that Putin “has much larger ambitions than Ukraine.” “He wants to, in fact, reëstablish the former Soviet Union,” Biden said. “His ambitions are completely contrary to the place where the rest of the world has arrived.” In one of a flurry of statements reflecting outrage globally, the European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, called Russia’s act “barbaric” and dismissed its justifications as “cynical.” In a tweet, the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, said he was appalled by Putin’s “horrific” decision to pursue “a path of bloodshed and destruction.” Putin’s military offensive put him on the diplomatic defensive. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, called the attack “a turning point” in history that will have a profound and lasting impact across the continent.
Putin may now also qualify as a war criminal, according to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. War crimes include willful killing and extensive destruction of property “not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.” The term has been inconsistently interpreted and unevenly applied to leaders or countries—including to the U.S. and its officials—who have initiated aggression for reasons considered unjustified. In Ukraine, Putin’s “war of choice” has clearly violated international law through his invasion of a sovereign country and attempt to oust its government. After an emergency United Nations Security Council meeting, on Wednesday, the Secretary-General, António Guterres, warned that the Russian invasion could be the “worst war” of the century “with consequences not only devastating for Ukraine, not only tragic for the Russian Federation” but for the entire world.
Much more at the link below...
Putin's Historic Miscalculation May Make Him a War Criminal
I totally agree. The above article was written by Robin Wright - a smart lady. What do you think?
There were more than 50 churches in Baghdad.Everyone knows you are a liar and no one believes a single thing you say.
Putin has been a war criminal practically from the day he took office. He's responsible for thousands of deaths in Syria & probably supplied poison gas to Assad who used it to murder countless Syrian citizens including women & children.Amen! Finally a sane response.
Why is Biden colluding with Putin and The Ayatollah to give Iran Nukes and ICBMs?Putin has been a war criminal practically from the day he took office. He's responsible for thousands of deaths in Syria & probably supplied poison gas to Assad who used it to murder countless Syrian citizens including women & children.
Nobody gave a shit what Putin did as long as the big bucks were rolling in by doing business over there & the proof is the number of U.S. corporations like Visa, Mastercard, UPS, IKEA, Apple, Ford, major airlines, the banking industry, big tech etc. etc. etc. who are pulling out. And the only reason they're pulling out now is the sanctions & to avoid negative publicity.
Money talks, bullshit walks.
Stop repeating what those voices in your head are telling you, foolish.Why is Biden colluding with Putin and The Ayatollah to give Iran Nukes and ICBMs?
Why do you think Iran should get help from Biden and Putin to launch a Nuclear Holocaust in The Middle East?Stop repeating what those voices in your head are telling you, foolish.
How do you know whether or not that his plan may have simply been to help The Great Reset be brought about?And the worst part of it is that Putin can't conquer anything! He can't conquer nations like Stalin, Adolf Hitler and Sadam could, at least they could lead more with an iron fist. Putin is a war criminal that is too soft who can't lead or conquer anything, he just repeatedly fails. His history of invasions/ military excursions have been blunders and so disappointing. Look how poorly planned his current invasion of Ukraine is! About the worst planning you could ask for. All he does is fail and disappoint militarily. He can't conquer anything ! All this effort to invade and conquer Ukraine is ultimately just going be in the long run a huge failure that just leads his country into a great depression. He has like the whole world against him and has failed to secure any allies helping him with this invasion, besides Belarus which really is just an extension of Russian. So he is just a failure who is just doomed to fail again and drag his whole Russian economy to the ground.
Now Biden & Putin are colluding to turn the Middle East back into the Stone Age, thereby wiping out the world's oil supply for centuries.Why do you think Iran should get help from Biden and Putin to launch a Nuclear Holocaust in The Middle East?
Why is Biden trying to make a deal with The Ayatollah and Maduro to buy Oil from Iran and Venezuela, while still buying Oil from Russia?
We must reduce The Earth's Population by 5 Billion. This is what The UN, and The Global Warming Church of The Holy Iceberg say we must do.Now Biden & Putin are colluding to turn the Middle East back into the Stone Age, thereby wiping out the world's oil supply for centuries.
Why sure!
View attachment 607107
In the eyes of the world and almost certainly history, Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine on Thursday was an epic miscalculation, drawing comparisons to Adolf Hitler and Saddam Hussein for cold-blooded aggression that could challenge the world order and change its borders. The Russian leader appeared almost delusional in a pre-dawn speech from the Kremlin announcing a “special military operation” to “protect” Donbas, the eastern region where Russian-backed separatists have waged a war for eight years. Putin, instead, immediately ordered Russian tanks into Ukraine and air strikes on the capital and more than a dozen cities in a country of forty million people. “Peace on our continent has been shattered,” the nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg told reporters. “We now have war in Europe on a scale and of a type we thought belonged to history.” Putin’s “reckless” attack risks “countless innocent lives,” Stoltenberg warned.
Putin is now, at minimum, a pariah condemned by leaders across the world. “Putin is the aggressor. Putin chose this war,” President Biden said in a speech to the nation announcing new sanctions on Russian financial institutions and élites. He charged that Putin “has much larger ambitions than Ukraine.” “He wants to, in fact, reëstablish the former Soviet Union,” Biden said. “His ambitions are completely contrary to the place where the rest of the world has arrived.” In one of a flurry of statements reflecting outrage globally, the European Commission chief, Ursula von der Leyen, called Russia’s act “barbaric” and dismissed its justifications as “cynical.” In a tweet, the British Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, said he was appalled by Putin’s “horrific” decision to pursue “a path of bloodshed and destruction.” Putin’s military offensive put him on the diplomatic defensive. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, called the attack “a turning point” in history that will have a profound and lasting impact across the continent.
Putin may now also qualify as a war criminal, according to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. War crimes include willful killing and extensive destruction of property “not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.” The term has been inconsistently interpreted and unevenly applied to leaders or countries—including to the U.S. and its officials—who have initiated aggression for reasons considered unjustified. In Ukraine, Putin’s “war of choice” has clearly violated international law through his invasion of a sovereign country and attempt to oust its government. After an emergency United Nations Security Council meeting, on Wednesday, the Secretary-General, António Guterres, warned that the Russian invasion could be the “worst war” of the century “with consequences not only devastating for Ukraine, not only tragic for the Russian Federation” but for the entire world.
Much more at the link below...
Putin's Historic Miscalculation May Make Him a War Criminal
I totally agree. The above article was written by Robin Wright - a smart lady. What do you think?
Funny. China didn't protect Russia today at the UN. China abstained.
