Qsts. about Wikileaks' emails....

[nat4900]

I mean to ask these questions in all sincerity from folks who can still exercise some objectivity:

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

I mean to ask these questions in all sincerity from folks who can still exercise some objectivity:

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

It's a vast right wing conspiracy that Hillary hasn't claimed they're fake.

 

[occupied]

The world desperately needs an organization like Wikileaks. I am deeply saddened that Assange has apparently sold out.

 

[Meathead]

I mean to ask these questions in all sincerity from folks who can still exercise some objectivity:

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

It's a vast right wing conspiracy that Hillary hasn't claimed they're fake.

Bingo! Since the Hillary camp hasn't come out screeching by now, we know they're real.

 

[nat4900]

Bingo! Since the Hillary camp hasn't come out screeching by now, we know they're real.

"Screeching".....as Trump is doing about the sexual accusations against him, ONLY make the stories more prominent in the news cycles.........
The Clinton campaign has proven a hell of a lot smarter than the self-center Trump fueling his own emerging messes.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

I mean to ask these questions in all sincerity from folks who can still exercise some objectivity:

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

 

[Meathead]

Bingo! Since the Hillary camp hasn't come out screeching by now, we know they're real.

"Screeching".....as Trump is doing about the sexual accusations against him, ONLY make the stories more prominent in the news cycles.........
The Clinton campaign has proven a hell of a lot smarter than the self-center Trump fueling his own emerging messes.

You've obviously never heard the Beast screech..., I mean talk.

 

[nat4900]

I mean to ask these questions in all sincerity from folks who can still exercise some objectivity:

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

Ahhhhhhh,, LadyShitSlinger was NOT able to address even ONE of my questions.......Moronic, but expected

(Lots of new right wingers' screen names on here after Nov. 8th....)

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

Answer:If it were me I would release my emails to counter the Wikileaks story to show that what they released was alter... It is the easiest way to counter those that are working to help elect the opposition party candidate

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

Answer:If your nutty family member stated something stupid then you need to clarify that their comment does not reflect you Candidate positions in this election but when the nutty family member is your candidate, well then would you vote for that family member if they were on the opposition party?

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

Answer: Every Political Party has it idiots, and the reason why the GOP is not being attacked is because they're not a threat to Wikileaks founder.

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

Answer: If Wikileaks has found altering the emails of those they are exposing then yes I agree with you they should be prevented from doing this and be shown to be the enemy they really are...

Now with that written if the emails Wikileaks has been releasing have not been altered and are showing actual words by the major candidate for President then they are doing the American Voter a just service by exposing the lies and corruption.

 

[nat4900]

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

Answer:If it were me I would release my emails to counter the Wikileaks story to show that what they released was alter... It is the easiest way to counter those that are working to help elect the opposition party candidate

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

Answer:If your nutty family member stated something stupid then you need to clarify that their comment does not reflect you Candidate positions in this election but when the nutty family member is your candidate, well then would you vote for that family member if they were on the opposition party?

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

Answer: Every Political Party has it idiots, and the reason why the GOP is not being attacked is because they're not a threat to Wikileaks founder.

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

Answer: If Wikileaks has found altering the emails of those they are exposing then yes I agree with you they should be prevented from doing this and be shown to be the enemy they really are...

Now with that written if the emails Wikileaks has been releasing have not been altered and are showing actual words by the major candidate for President then they are doing the American Voter a just service by exposing the lies and corruption.

Thank you for at least addressing the questions I posed......And, regarding your first response, I would expect that the Clinton campaign WILL and SHOULD release what the original emails stated.........that is, if they were indeed altered.

 

[Norman]

The world desperately needs an organization like Wikileaks. I am deeply saddened that Assange has apparently sold out.

What do you mean sold out? He is exposing corruption as always.

Seems like you don't like it when it turns out your team is corrupt as hell, with a wall street puppet on charge. Even though, there was no question about it even before the leaks. Better get used to the fact that this can be the case and vote accordingly.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The world desperately needs an organization like Wikileaks. I am deeply saddened that Assange has apparently sold out.

If Wiki was exposing right wing corruption you'd be screaming praise for them. Deny it and you're lying

 

[occupied]

The world desperately needs an organization like Wikileaks. I am deeply saddened that Assange has apparently sold out.

What do you mean sold out? He is exposing corruption as always.

Seems like you don't like it when it turns out your team is corrupt as hell. Even though, there was no question about it even before the leaks. Better get used to the fact that this can be the case and vote accordingly.

I find it very suspicious that absolutely nothing has been published there about Trump or the republicans. The whole thing stinks. My theory is that Russia hacked everyone and is holding the republican stuff for blackmail, that thought should give you pause. Republicans have been unaccountably friendly to Russia lately.

 

[occupied]

The world desperately needs an organization like Wikileaks. I am deeply saddened that Assange has apparently sold out.

If Wiki was exposing right wing corruption you'd be screaming praise for them. Deny it and you're lying

You have hit on the thing that I find most suspicious, they always did focus on right wing authoritarians. To suddenly switch focus and cooperate with Russian espionage is so out of character that I doubt Assange is even in control of his own website any more.

 

[nat4900]

If Wiki was exposing right wing corruption you'd be screaming praise for them. Deny it and you're lying

"Think" what you want, but if Wikileaks were attacking the GOP I'd be skeptical of a foreign entity (not a news agency, mind you) interfering with US elections........I believe my side of the aisle can defend itself without help from an outside entity....
Obviously, your side is too weak to do so.....

 

[SassyIrishLass]

If Wiki was exposing right wing corruption you'd be screaming praise for them. Deny it and you're lying

"Think" what you want, but if Wikileaks were attacking the GOP I'd be skeptical of a foreign entity (not a news agency, mind you) interfering with US elections........I believe my side of the aisle can defend itself without help from an outside entity....
Obviously, your side is too weak to do so.....

Sure ya would....there's that. Now go bug someone else, I'm weary of your nonsense

 

[nat4900]

Now go bug someone else, I'm weary of your nonsense

Let's see you spew your stupidity on a thread I started, and then you want me to go somewhere else????
Too early in the morning to be a bit tipsy there, Sassy................LOL

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Now go bug someone else, I'm weary of your nonsense

Let's see you spew your stupidity on a thread I started, and then you want me to go somewhere else????
Too early in the morning to be a bit tipsy there, Sassy................LOL

I didn't reply to you did I? Get over yourself already, you forget I know what a fraud you are therefore you're a nothing to me.

Understand? You lied and are never to be taken serious

 

[nat4900]

I didn't reply to you did I? Get over yourself already, you forget I know what a fraud you are therefore you're a nothing to me.

Understand? You lied and are never to be taken serious

have another morning "pick-me-up", Sassy.............(what a dolt....LOL)

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I didn't reply to you did I? Get over yourself already, you forget I know what a fraud you are therefore you're a nothing to me.

Understand? You lied and are never to be taken serious

have another morning "pick-me-up", Sassy.............(what a dolt....LOL)