Qsts. about Wikileaks' emails....

[Two Thumbs]

I mean to ask these questions in all sincerity from folks who can still exercise some objectivity:

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?

1. How do we really know the authenticity of these emails? How do we know that subject lines have not been altered? How do we know that some terms have not been changed?

if this was about bush, you never would have asked that.

2. As most families would rather not always defend what a family member has stated, should we not afford the same amount of embarrassment to what some folks within the DNC may have stated to one another? In other words, we all may have some "nutty" family member who states stupid things.....we may not be proud of that, but we mostly accept that some family members sometime state stupid things.

trump said some shit 30 years ago, but it means something to you, now.


3. Why hasn't Wikileaks also attacked the republican establishment? Can anyone on the right honestly state that the republican establishment does NOT have some idiots stating distasteful assertions?

aww, poor baby, not getting enough fairness in your diet? There's no chance that dems are more corrupt?


4. Should we really believe that Wikileaks is acting on its own without the help of a foreign (and our country's avowed enemy) government apparatus? Should we really allow a foreign entity (as Wikileaks certainly is) to affect and possibly impact our electoral processes?[/QUOTE]

you should tell kkkillary to give all the money that she gets from other countries away.


oh, wait, that's magically different.

 

[Two Thumbs]

The world desperately needs an organization like Wikileaks. I am deeply saddened that Assange has apparently sold out.

and here's a leftist moron proving his idiocy beyond all doubt.

I'd explain, but I'd have to define every word and then define the words in the definition.

 

[nat4900]

The I told you so's that will be coming would have little meaning if I changed it.

Atta boy, that's the attitude....hope for the worst and you'll probably achieve it.