Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I honestly expected a quick direct answer. I expected a real gun enthusiast would know. The gun nuts here only have answers to stock questions. They only know what the NRA has told them to say.
nobody is going to use a bump stock to defend their home. they are gimmick, nothing more
At least 3 were used in the Las Vegas shooting.
What home was he defending?
Why do you require a dominatrix. She is of no practical use, but you have one just the same. Right?Even more accurate is you are either a coward or you can't come up with anything other than self-defense that requires high rate and capacity.
I've hunted hogs. Nobody needs that kind of rate or capacity for feral hogs. It might be fun to use them for that, but certainly not required.
Your response doesn't answer the question in any way. Are you just too much of a coward to give a valid answer?
Even more accurate is you are either a coward or you can't come up with anything other than self-defense that requires high rate and capacity.
At least 3 were used in the Las Vegas shooting.
What are you, 12?He obviously didn't like the music and was expressing his 2nd amendment right.
What are you, 12?
You are a cult member, you don’t utilize logic, you do as your told Sally.Just using your own logic to answer your question.
You are a cult member, you don’t utilize logic, you do as your told Sally.
He obviously didn't like the music and was expressing his 2nd amendment right.
Why do you need a another reason besides self-defense?Lots of talk about bump stocks and high rate of fire rifles. I understand there is a constitutional right to bear arms, but on a practical level, is there any reason for high rate of fire for anything other than self-defense? Obviously, if you are defending your home from attackers, you need that high rate of fire, and extended capacity, but are there any other circumstances where a high rate of fire and extended capacity are required?
Yes it was, and I hope those who voted for it are enjoying their eternity in Hell.. The Federal 1934 Firearms act was about the first thing to chip away an 1/3 of the 2n A.
Why do you need a another reason besides self-defense?
There is another reason though: to come to the defense of others.
Also, to fight and overthrow the government. The primary reason for the right to bear arms is to have the ability to overthrow a tyrannical government.
Tell us more about your heroic exploits, Vrenn!I have an experience that only about 3 percent of the population has and have used in combat the types of weapons you want to have available to every tom dick and fruitcake. I am just tough enough. And I must be just tough enough but my enemies weren't.
Tell us more about your heroic exploits, Vrenn!
It is better to be a warrior in a garden, then a gardener in a war.Lots of talk about bump stocks and high rate of fire rifles. I understand there is a constitutional right to bear arms, but on a practical level, is there any reason for high rate of fire for anything other than self-defense? Obviously, if you are defending your home from attackers, you need that high rate of fire, and extended capacity, but are there any other circumstances where a high rate of fire and extended capacity are required?
Vrenn, please do tell the USMB forum more about how tough you are, Mr. Internet Tough Guy.I ain't no hero but I served with real Heroes and you ain't one of them.
Men can’t become women. One side believe they can. The other uses logic. You lose cult boy.A Magat Cult45er claiming someone else is a cult? Now that's hilarious.
