Question for libs: what is your cutoff date for coronavirus vaccination?

[Asclepias]

Is this the first task force meeting? Shouldnt this be more like their 30th meeting?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?

Given limited availability of the life-saving drug would you support giving to 95-year olds last?

how about people over 80 who are American citizens?

Do you support vaccinating an 18-year old illegal alien instead of a 75-year old American citizen with a bad heart?

I actually support giving it to the 95 year old first. In fact, that vaccination should go to those over 55 and 12 and under first--As well as first responders.


I'm a liberal. I'm just not a Democrat. I know it's difficult for people to actually grasp that.

Its amazing how ignorant most cons are. They cant conceive of a person being liberal without being a dem.

Its just that people who vote Dem get a Prog.....a socialist....and coming soon...a communist!

I dont have a problem with any of those 3 when considering the alternative.

We understand.

America First vs Commie, Socialist, "Progressive"

We understand your choice

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

"Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?"

Can you direct us to a quote where they said this before we start chasing your imaginary rabbit?

Bloomberg: We Can No Longer Provide Health Care to the Elderly

Where is the part where they said keeping old people alive is too expensive or is it that you have a hard time understanding what they actually said?

Actually Bloomberg is the one on record mentioning the age 95 and wasting money on someone that will die with cancer.

If the person is healthy and the vaccine will keep them alive then they should get it but let say they have AIDS, Stage Four Cancer or vote Democrat then nah let not waste taxpayer money on saving them...

( The last part about not saving Democrats was me trolling or was I? )

In the end when the vaccine come out it should be given to kids first, women, then the elderly and finally healthy males.

And no I am not trolling here...

Bloomberg comment:

 

[Asclepias]

Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?

Given limited availability of the life-saving drug would you support giving to 95-year olds last?

how about people over 80 who are American citizens?

Do you support vaccinating an 18-year old illegal alien instead of a 75-year old American citizen with a bad heart?

I actually support giving it to the 95 year old first. In fact, that vaccination should go to those over 55 and 12 and under first--As well as first responders.


I'm a liberal. I'm just not a Democrat. I know it's difficult for people to actually grasp that.

Its amazing how ignorant most cons are. They cant conceive of a person being liberal without being a dem.

Its just that people who vote Dem get a Prog.....a socialist....and coming soon...a communist!

I dont have a problem with any of those 3 when considering the alternative.

We understand.

America First vs Commie, Socialist, "Progressive"

We understand your choice

Obviously you dont understand. Youre too dumb to get it but I know why.

 

[Asclepias]

"Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?"

Can you direct us to a quote where they said this before we start chasing your imaginary rabbit?

Bloomberg: We Can No Longer Provide Health Care to the Elderly

Where is the part where they said keeping old people alive is too expensive or is it that you have a hard time understanding what they actually said?

Actually Bloomberg is the one on record mentioning the age 95 and wasting money on someone that will die with cancer.

If the person is healthy and the vaccine will keep them alive then they should get it but let say they have AIDS, Stage Four Cancer or vote Democrat then nah let not waste taxpayer money on saving them...

( The last part about not saving Democrats was me trolling or was I? )

In the end when the vaccine come out it should be given to kids first, women, then the elderly and finally healthy males.

And no I am not trolling here...

Bloomberg comment:

"..wasting money on someone that will die with cancer."

Thats not the same as saying keeping old people alive is too expensive and I dont think youre trolling. There is a big difference in not keeping someone alive thats going to die because their bodies will simply not respond to treatment vs letting people die after they hit age X.

 

[the other mike]

They don't need quotes or facts because Alex Jones told them it's true.

Alex who ?
How many followers do you think he had even before Google and everyone else censored him ?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

"Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?"

Can you direct us to a quote where they said this before we start chasing your imaginary rabbit?

Bloomberg: We Can No Longer Provide Health Care to the Elderly

Where is the part where they said keeping old people alive is too expensive or is it that you have a hard time understanding what they actually said?

Actually Bloomberg is the one on record mentioning the age 95 and wasting money on someone that will die with cancer.

If the person is healthy and the vaccine will keep them alive then they should get it but let say they have AIDS, Stage Four Cancer or vote Democrat then nah let not waste taxpayer money on saving them...

( The last part about not saving Democrats was me trolling or was I? )

In the end when the vaccine come out it should be given to kids first, women, then the elderly and finally healthy males.

And no I am not trolling here...

Bloomberg comment:

"..wasting money on someone that will die with cancer."

Thats not the same as saying keeping old people alive is too expensive and I dont think youre trolling. There is a big difference in not keeping someone alive thats going to die because their bodies will simply not respond to treatment vs letting people die after they hit age X.

Actually I do not disagree with Bloomberg on what he said but many will...

We already do this and that is reality.

You are 95 dying from Cancer then sorry but go home and be comfortable and if you are 95 and already dying then no you should not have the Coronavirus vaccine wasted on you.

I apologize if this hurt someone but the vaccine should be used on those that will survive and let me be clear I will pass up the vaccine so someone healthier can have it.

So before someone make a claim I will beg for it, no I will not and understand if I contract the virus but know I am dying anyway then screw wasting the vaccine on me!

 

[Asclepias]

They don't need quotes or facts because Alex Jones told them it's true.

Alex who ?
How many followers do you think he had even before Google and everyone else censored him ?

Why did you say Alex who as if you didnt know who he was? Obviously most cons followed him as most of them repeat verbatim whatever stupid shit leaked out of his mouth.

 

[Asclepias]

"Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?"

Can you direct us to a quote where they said this before we start chasing your imaginary rabbit?

Bloomberg: We Can No Longer Provide Health Care to the Elderly

Where is the part where they said keeping old people alive is too expensive or is it that you have a hard time understanding what they actually said?

Actually Bloomberg is the one on record mentioning the age 95 and wasting money on someone that will die with cancer.

If the person is healthy and the vaccine will keep them alive then they should get it but let say they have AIDS, Stage Four Cancer or vote Democrat then nah let not waste taxpayer money on saving them...

( The last part about not saving Democrats was me trolling or was I? )

In the end when the vaccine come out it should be given to kids first, women, then the elderly and finally healthy males.

And no I am not trolling here...

Bloomberg comment:

"..wasting money on someone that will die with cancer."

Thats not the same as saying keeping old people alive is too expensive and I dont think youre trolling. There is a big difference in not keeping someone alive thats going to die because their bodies will simply not respond to treatment vs letting people die after they hit age X.

Actually I do but disagree with Bloomberg on what he said but many will...

We already do this and that is reality.

You are 95 dying from Cancer then sorry but go home and be comfortable and if you are 95 and already dying then no you should not have the Coronavirus vaccine wasted on you.

I apologize of this hurt someone but the vaccine should be used on those that will survive and let me be clear I will pass up the vaccine so someone healthier can have it.

So before someone make a claim I will beg for it, no I will not and understand if I contract the virus but know I am dying anyway then screw wasting the vaccine on me!

Yeah I agree that passing it up would be a selfless act for someone that knows they are not long for this world health wise. To me its just common sense if there are limited supplies. I feel that people who would save themselves over someone that has a better chance are cowards and afraid of death.

 

[Aletheia4u]

I guess the Deep State has figured out a way to get Pres.Trump's supporters to vote for the Democrats.

 

[the other mike]

Why did you say Alex who as if you didnt know who he was? Obviously most cons followed him as most of them repeat verbatim whatever stupid shit leaked out of his mouth.

The only thing obvious is that you're living in a box
if you think anyone at all got their exclusive news from Alex Jones or any other one person for that matter..

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Bloomberg: We Can No Longer Provide Health Care to the Elderly

Where is the part where they said keeping old people alive is too expensive or is it that you have a hard time understanding what they actually said?

Actually Bloomberg is the one on record mentioning the age 95 and wasting money on someone that will die with cancer.

If the person is healthy and the vaccine will keep them alive then they should get it but let say they have AIDS, Stage Four Cancer or vote Democrat then nah let not waste taxpayer money on saving them...

( The last part about not saving Democrats was me trolling or was I? )

In the end when the vaccine come out it should be given to kids first, women, then the elderly and finally healthy males.

And no I am not trolling here...

Bloomberg comment:

"..wasting money on someone that will die with cancer."

Thats not the same as saying keeping old people alive is too expensive and I dont think youre trolling. There is a big difference in not keeping someone alive thats going to die because their bodies will simply not respond to treatment vs letting people die after they hit age X.

Actually I do but disagree with Bloomberg on what he said but many will...

We already do this and that is reality.

You are 95 dying from Cancer then sorry but go home and be comfortable and if you are 95 and already dying then no you should not have the Coronavirus vaccine wasted on you.

I apologize of this hurt someone but the vaccine should be used on those that will survive and let me be clear I will pass up the vaccine so someone healthier can have it.

So before someone make a claim I will beg for it, no I will not and understand if I contract the virus but know I am dying anyway then screw wasting the vaccine on me!

Yeah I agree that passing it up would be a selfless act for someone that knows they are not long for this world health wise. To me its just common sense if there are limited supplies. I feel that people who would save themselves over someone that has a better chance are cowards and afraid of death.

I have kissed Death lips three times so far and not I am not mistaking Death with Beth...

So I made damn sure I have DNR this time and if told they will waste a vaccine on me I will punch the idiot with the needle and tell them a kid or a woman that is young and healthy get it and not me!

I have wasted enough oxygen on this planet!

 

[Asclepias]

Why did you say Alex who as if you didnt know who he was? Obviously most cons followed him as most of them repeat verbatim whatever stupid shit leaked out of his mouth.

The only thing obvious is that you're living in a box
if you think anyone whatsoever got their exclusive news from Alex Jones or any other one person.

No one said anyone got their news exclusively from Alex Jones. I dont know why its so hard for you to read and comprehend but what I said was that obviously most cons followed Jones because they all tend to repeat whatever foul shit leaked from his lips verbatim.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Why did you say Alex who as if you didnt know who he was? Obviously most cons followed him as most of them repeat verbatim whatever stupid shit leaked out of his mouth.

The only thing obvious is that you're living in a box
if you think anyone at all got their exclusive news from Alex Jones or any other one person for that matter..

I only get my news from Peter Jennings...

Anyhoo, fact is most people do not use multiple news sources and rely on one source for their opinion pieces and spin.

I prefer Al-Jazeera or BBC or CBC but some prefer Alex Jones and Mark Levin and others prefer Rachel Maddow or Wolf Blitzer...

 

[the other mike]

No one said anyone got their news exclusively from Alex Jones. I dont know why its so hard for you to read and comprehend but what I said was that obviously most cons followed Jones because they all tend to repeat whatever foul shit leaked from his lips verbatim.

I wasn't even talking to you.

They don't need quotes or facts because Alex Jones told them it's true.

Alex who ?
How many followers do you think he had even before Google and everyone else censored him ?

"Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?"

Can you direct us to a quote where they said this before we start chasing your imaginary rabbit?

They don't need quotes or facts because Alex Jones told them it's true.

 

[the other mike]

I only get my news from Peter Jennings...

Anyhoo, fact is most people do not use multiple news sources and rely on one source for their opinion pieces and spin.

I prefer Al-Jazeera or BBC or CBC but some prefer Alex Jones and Mark Levin and others prefer Rachel Maddow or Wolf Blitzer...

Al Jazeera is Saudi propaganda--didn't used to be at first, when they bought it from Al Gore ( and I used to like CurrentTV ). But they are now.

 

[Asclepias]

No one said anyone got their news exclusively from Alex Jones. I dont know why its so hard for you to read and comprehend but what I said was that obviously most cons followed Jones because they all tend to repeat whatever foul shit leaked from his lips verbatim.

I wasn't even talking to you.

They don't need quotes or facts because Alex Jones told them it's true.

Alex who ?
How many followers do you think he had even before Google and everyone else censored him ?

"Considering obama and other democrats like mike bloomberg saying that keeping old people alive is too expensive what is the cutoff date for the commievirus vaccination?"

Can you direct us to a quote where they said this before we start chasing your imaginary rabbit?

They don't need quotes or facts because Alex Jones told them it's true.

I didnt ask you if you were talking to me. I was talking to you though.

 

[jameny5]

I'm a liberal. I'm just not a Democrat. I know it's difficult for people to actually grasp that.

Well, are you a Trump supporter?

Nope but that doesn't mean that I support the non-stop level of BS thrown at him either. Here is the deal. He leaves this next year or he stays for another 4. I'm of the mind he will be here for another 4. It is what it is. Deal with it. That said, his power is actually limited and people need to start paying attention to Congress and to what is going down in the States.

I wonder what "liar" will replace the current "liar" after he leaves office? Any ideas? Who can top the Chaos King and his buffoonery.

 

[the other mike]

1,063 Documented Examples of Barack Obama’s Lying, Lawbreaking, Corruption, Cronyism, Hypocrisy, Waste, Etc.

 

[Asclepias]

I'm a liberal. I'm just not a Democrat. I know it's difficult for people to actually grasp that.

Well, are you a Trump supporter?

Nope but that doesn't mean that I support the non-stop level of BS thrown at him either. Here is the deal. He leaves this next year or he stays for another 4. I'm of the mind he will be here for another 4. It is what it is. Deal with it. That said, his power is actually limited and people need to start paying attention to Congress and to what is going down in the States.

I wonder what "liar" will replace the current "liar" after he leaves office? Any ideas? Who can top the Chaos King and his buffoonery.

Considering that Drumpf is the first of the reality show, buffoonery type of politicians he will be the standard for a long time to come on.