Thinker101
Diamond Member
- Mar 25, 2017
- 24,731
- 14,961
- 1,415
I'd believe a "let's raid every politicians house" verdict.Would you believe a not guilty verdict?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd believe a "let's raid every politicians house" verdict.Would you believe a not guilty verdict?
Why should there be a trial at all? Hillary doesnt have a trial. Why does Trump? Are you seeing a pattern here?I'm sure what you mean by rolling over.
It would be proven in court of law presided over by a Trump appointed judge, with a jury from Florida.
When Joe Biden is indicted and tried for accepting 10 Million dollars in bribery money from a Ukrainian Oligarch, then yes I would accept any ruling in Trump's documents case.
Yes, because Biden is weaponizing the DOJ to go after Trump. This trial shouldnt even exist.Does it make sense for other criminal cases to stop until another one gets decided?
I'd believe a "let's raid every politicians house" verdict.
Yes, because Biden is weaponizing the DOJ to go after Trump. This trial shouldnt even exist.
He shouldnt be facing either possibility. This trial shouldnt be happening at all.It's doubtful that will be the verdict. Would you believe a guilty one? What if he is found not guilty?
We dont try people who take documents. That precedent was set by Hillary Clinton very recently even. Why is Trump suddenly being charged for it?
We do not have equal justice under the law. Anyone with a functioning brain can see that. I need to see PROOF that we have two Presidents who have done exactly the same thing be treated under the law in exactly the same way. The DOJ is operated by and works for the Democratic Party. This goes WAY beyond a classified documents case, this is the foundation of our country crumbling.Does it make sense for other criminal cases to stop until another one gets decided?
No
The trial is to jam up a potential presidential run and to get even for his attempted dismantling of the status quo. It is also a warning for any future presidents who think about bucking the system.
He shouldnt be facing either possibility. This trial shouldnt be happening at all.
I want you to know this is all going to come back on your party. Enjoy your weaponization of the DOJ now because, when its our turn, youre going to fucking hate it. I promise you will hate it with a passion.
Are you asking the question out of true curiosity or because you want to argue against an answer you do not agree with?
Thanks for your honesty. My original answer stands and I won't elaborate.Both. It is a political discussion board.
If you have ever had a security clearance you would not ask that question. The info is classified until you KNOW it is not.I wonder how many of those documents are so outdated that their 'classified' status is moot.
Good question. It should come out in the trial. The defense lawyers should be all over this.I wonder how many of those documents are so outdated that their 'classified' status is moot.
No. The DOJ and FBI protects Joe Biden's criminality while REPEATEDLY going after Trump. Until they PROVE they are willing to apply equal justice to Joe Biden, any decision in any court is tainted.Wouldn't a verdict in a court of law with a Trump appointed judge and jury from Florida disprove your theory?
No, it is classified until it is officially unclassified. I guess until Trump thinks about it.Good question. It should come it in the trial. The defense lawyers should be all over this.
No, it is classified until it is officially unclassified. I guess until Trump thinks about it.![]()