- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,638
- 53,532
From the OP.
Obviously, MAGAs think the Border Patrol has been nefariously withholding vital information from President Biden.
Violated Rule.
Furthermore, when starting a new thread and declaring something as fact in your opening post, you must also link to a source.
The OP stated what "MAGAs (whatever they are) think." I would like to know what he bases that obvious assumption on. I have not seen a post or report anywhere supporting that assertion. What is the OP basing his assertion that anyone thinks the "Border patrol has been nefariously withholding vital information from Biden? Do your job and quit being obtuse.
OK Bulldog, please respond, because, it IS possible, when I got the multiple reports, I made the wrong assumption.
Obviously, MAGAs think the Border Patrol has been nefariously withholding vital information from President Biden.
I made the assumption, that you were making this statement, as an hypothesis of OPINION, rather than one of fact?
Is this a wrong hypothesis? Do you claim this as a fact, or is this an hypothesis of OPINION?
This construction of a satirical straw-man, we intended to demonstrate, what everyone already knows, everything that there is to know, that is going on at the border, IT IS SNARK.
IS it not?
The statement that is being tested against the null hypothesis is the alternative hypothesis.
Null hypothesis - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Also see
Socratic method - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org