Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
but it isn't his claim. derpThe inaccuracy is the claim that -18 and -18 get you to 29.
The claim is certainly...most definitely...beyond a doubt inaccurate...and yet...that claim describes the basic mechanism for the greenhouse effect...
The claim is certainly...most definitely...beyond a doubt inaccurate...
Like most of your claims.
His claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it. And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it. SSDD didn't claim that it does he was exposing the fact that our ivory towers of science are full of shit and there are a whole lot of people swallowing it.
Dude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat holeYeah he posted that. He did that to see who agreed with the formula. Nothing more nothing lesshe never claimed that all. not sure what thread your in?but it isn't his claim. derp
His claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
two radiators...both radiating ...239.7wm^2 equates to a radiating temperature of -18 degrees....so they combine the radiation from these two radiators which are radiating at -18 degrees and suddenly you have a temperature of 29.85 degrees...
Post #135.
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't. Were you lying?
He did that to see who agreed with the formula.
Yes, he posted an inaccurate formula and was shocked that no one agreed.
Another rat hole postbut it isn't his claim. derpThe claim is certainly...most definitely...beyond a doubt inaccurate...and yet...that claim describes the basic mechanism for the greenhouse effect...
The claim is certainly...most definitely...beyond a doubt inaccurate...
Like most of your claims.
His claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it. And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it. SSDD didn't claim that it does he was exposing the fact that our ivory towers of science are full of shit and there are a whole lot of people swallowing it.
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it.
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
Dude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat holeYeah he posted that. He did that to see who agreed with the formula. Nothing more nothing lesshe never claimed that all. not sure what thread your in?His claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
two radiators...both radiating ...239.7wm^2 equates to a radiating temperature of -18 degrees....so they combine the radiation from these two radiators which are radiating at -18 degrees and suddenly you have a temperature of 29.85 degrees...
Post #135.
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't. Were you lying?
He did that to see who agreed with the formula.
Yes, he posted an inaccurate formula and was shocked that no one agreed.
What errorDude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat holeYeah he posted that. He did that to see who agreed with the formula. Nothing more nothing lesshe never claimed that all. not sure what thread your in?
two radiators...both radiating ...239.7wm^2 equates to a radiating temperature of -18 degrees....so they combine the radiation from these two radiators which are radiating at -18 degrees and suddenly you have a temperature of 29.85 degrees...
Post #135.
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't. Were you lying?
He did that to see who agreed with the formula.
Yes, he posted an inaccurate formula and was shocked that no one agreed.
Pointing out your error (lie?) is mud?
Another rat hole postbut it isn't his claim. derpThe claim is certainly...most definitely...beyond a doubt inaccurate...
Like most of your claims.
His claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it. And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it. SSDD didn't claim that it does he was exposing the fact that our ivory towers of science are full of shit and there are a whole lot of people swallowing it.
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it.
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
What errorDude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat holeYeah he posted that. He did that to see who agreed with the formula. Nothing more nothing lesstwo radiators...both radiating ...239.7wm^2 equates to a radiating temperature of -18 degrees....so they combine the radiation from these two radiators which are radiating at -18 degrees and suddenly you have a temperature of 29.85 degrees...
Post #135.
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't. Were you lying?
He did that to see who agreed with the formula.
Yes, he posted an inaccurate formula and was shocked that no one agreed.
Pointing out your error (lie?) is mud?
What errorAnother rat hole postbut it isn't his claim. derp
His claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it. And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it. SSDD didn't claim that it does he was exposing the fact that our ivory towers of science are full of shit and there are a whole lot of people swallowing it.
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it.
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
Pointing out his error (lie?) is a rat hole?
Rat holeWhat errorDude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat holeYeah he posted that. He did that to see who agreed with the formula. Nothing more nothing less
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't. Were you lying?
He did that to see who agreed with the formula.
Yes, he posted an inaccurate formula and was shocked that no one agreed.
Pointing out your error (lie?) is mud?
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't.
What errorAnother rat hole postHis claim was -18 and -18 give you something warmer.
Who else claimed that besides SSDD?
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it. And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it. SSDD didn't claim that it does he was exposing the fact that our ivory towers of science are full of shit and there are a whole lot of people swallowing it.
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it.
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
Pointing out his error (lie?) is a rat hole?
Rat holeWhat errorDude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat holeYeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't. Were you lying?
He did that to see who agreed with the formula.
Yes, he posted an inaccurate formula and was shocked that no one agreed.
Pointing out your error (lie?) is mud?
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't.
Did it?What errorAnother rat hole postThe links provided from universities are the ones claiming it. And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it. SSDD didn't claim that it does he was exposing the fact that our ivory towers of science are full of shit and there are a whole lot of people swallowing it.
The links provided from universities are the ones claiming it.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it.
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
Pointing out his error (lie?) is a rat hole?
2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
You did? What lie?Rat holeWhat errorDude you need to get out of the mud! I'm not going down your rat hole
Pointing out your error (lie?) is mud?
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't.
Caught you in a lie. Your own rat hole.
Did it?What errorAnother rat hole postThe links provided from universities are the ones claiming it.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And it hilarious to see the hoard defending it.
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
Pointing out his error (lie?) is a rat hole?
2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
You did? What lie?Rat holeWhat errorPointing out your error (lie?) is mud?
Yeah he posted that.
You claimed he didn't.
Caught you in a lie. Your own rat hole.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
Did it?What errorAnother rat hole post
Pointing out his error (lie?) is a rat hole?
2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
No, 2 radiators at -18C did not heat something up to 29C.
None of the links said 2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
And even when it is explained to you in very simple terms...and the temperatures are converted for you...you still can't read and understand what a simple equation is stating....here genius...if it doesn't say that one radiator radiating up at -18 degrees and one radiator radiating down at-18 degrees combine to produce an output of 29 degrees..do tell what it does say...or don't and prove once again that you don't grasp any of this and 5th grade level one liners are really all you are capable of...
T = (239.7 + 239.7) / (5.67 X 10^-8) = 303K
I see a hoard pointing out SSDD's errors.
So after you tell us what the above equation is describing...then perhaps you can describe exactly what errors I have made...funny from you since you can't even read the above equation...but entertain me anyway.
Did it?What errorPointing out his error (lie?) is a rat hole?
2 radiators at -18C warmed up something to 29C
No, 2 radiators at -18C did not heat something up to 29C.
T = (239.7 + 239.7) / (5.67 X 10^-8) = 303K
Lets hear it genius...what does it say?...see the T at the beginning that stands for temperature....see the two 239.7 added together...that is one radiating up at -18 degrees and one radiating down at -18 degrees.....see the 303K at the end...that is their radiating temperature according to that equation...303K is about 29 degrees....
So once again....explained to you in basic detail....if that isn't what it says...then by all means...lets here what you think it says...
Yes. Substituting a value of temperature into an equation that requires a value of power density is idiocy. Thinking others should believe it is truly the sign of a troll.239.7 means W/m2, not -18C.
