Rachel Maddow cries over reopened Hillary case

"Truth Kings" indeed. I watched it. She wasn't crying, not even close.
Hillary has already been determined to be extremely reckless, it has already been determined that indeed she had top secret and classified material on her private server. She has already said it was a mistake (and how). What more do you think Huma's e-mails will uncover that will somehow change the outcome of the investigation?
They could be duplicates of e-mails already reviewed, or they could be totally inconsequential, or they could include maybe one more classified e-mail, improperly marked, that slipped through.
Wow.
Any one who believes there is nothing damaging about the new E-mails is denying reality. Anyone who thinks the reopening of the case is not going to cause an indictment of Hillary has their head in the sand. Comey said it is additional evidence in the case he closed, thus the reopening. This is not about Weiner or Huma alone. Both of them are going to jail over the E-mails. If it was not about Hillary, why would the FBI reopen the case against her? Hillary is going to jail too or an investigation wouldn't be ongoing this close to the election. Comey either has concrete proof or else this is his excuse for committing suicide. Liberals, you can get your head out of your duffel bag and use some common sense. And there's no need to go whistling past the graveyard for the residents are at the voting polls.

It's Comey's bizarre suicide. Comey broke his OWN rules offering up this speculation so close to an election. This would be true if he did the same thing to Trump as Clinton. There is something very odd about this guy. He knows the rules and did it anyway.
I disagree about the motives. I have never heard of a LEO ignoring the law just so a person can run for election. Besides, he is righting a wrong. And if Trump broke any laws he should be indicted, even at the swearing in ceremony.


"even at the swearing in ceremony." Our institutions and ceremony of the country are more important than that. There is plenty of time to bring actual charges in a respectful fashion. Comey has gone rogue and must be fired as soon as it is possible AFTER our next president has been sworn in.
The law is more important than Pomp and Circumstance. Comey is doing his job. Trump wouldn't fire him.

It is not his "job" to influence our elections with speculative information. Factually supported "charges" maybe but what he has presented is a stack of unexamined emails from a totally different investigation involving a child/sex angle that has no direct association with Clinton. What Comey has done is attempt to influence a federal election by innuendo and smear tactics without any factually based charge or legally directed influence such as a federal grand jury or the guidance of his superiors.
 
I've never see her cry. Not like Republicans who weep at the drop of a hat.
 
Dykes With Mikes--Yikes!

Mata Huma's thighs will soak up Rachel's tears.


an example of a right winger's IQ and, of course, good taste.....
Mind-Raped by Father-Figure Professors

Despite their comforting sense of intellectual superiority, those brainwashed in academentia have had their IQs fried in bacon. In college, you live like a child. So you wind up with the mind of a child, as proven by your assumption that anyone who disagrees with your Fairyphilia must be stupid.
 
Despite their comforting sense of intellectual superiority, those brainwashed in academentia have had their IQs fried in bacon. In college, you live like a child. So you wind up with the mind of a child, as proven by your assumption that anyone who disagrees with your Fairyphilia must be stupid.


Adequate proof with the above that you "may" have driven by a college campus, but never stepped foot in one.
 
"Truth Kings" indeed. I watched it. She wasn't crying, not even close.
Hillary has already been determined to be extremely reckless, it has already been determined that indeed she had top secret and classified material on her private server. She has already said it was a mistake (and how). What more do you think Huma's e-mails will uncover that will somehow change the outcome of the investigation?
They could be duplicates of e-mails already reviewed, or they could be totally inconsequential, or they could include maybe one more classified e-mail, improperly marked, that slipped through.
Wow.
Any one who believes there is nothing damaging about the new E-mails is denying reality. Anyone who thinks the reopening of the case is not going to cause an indictment of Hillary has their head in the sand. Comey said it is additional evidence in the case he closed, thus the reopening. This is not about Weiner or Huma alone. Both of them are going to jail over the E-mails. If it was not about Hillary, why would the FBI reopen the case against her? Hillary is going to jail too or an investigation wouldn't be ongoing this close to the election. Comey either has concrete proof or else this is his excuse for committing suicide. Liberals, you can get your head out of your duffel bag and use some common sense. And there's no need to go whistling past the graveyard for the residents are at the voting polls.

They are in full deflect and deny mode indeed. It's a catastrophe for her.
Amen!

And what was one of the fat blob's first reactions? She LIED yet again, telling her audience Comey's letter was sent only to Republican House members. Hildebeast think: Oops, I'm in trouble again so best try to deflect with a lie suggesting collusion between FBI guy Comey and Republicans. Yeah, my low info dupes and media shills will instead zero in on that for sure.
 

Forum List

Back
Top