Racist Black Judge Railroading Amber Guyger

[Grumblenuts]

Which link are you referring to?

A current, authoritative source saying for “criminal trespass” in Texas:
"

• You must have acted intentionally
• There must have been some notice posted or you were asked to leave
• You must be physically present on the property"

 

[Grumblenuts]

Plenty of malice on display here, afore and after thought. Murderous, depraved hearts. Mental states purposely, knowingly, and recklessly manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.

 

[flewism]

She being so confused to the point she didn't know where she was, does not justify her actions.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

She being so confused to the point she didn't know where she was, does not justify her actions.

Not a good description of that event. She was not confused per se....just like a lot of folks when they have a lot on their mind and after having worked a l3 hr shift she was not focused real well....when you live in a big apartment building like that...you get into a rouotine park at a certain level on which your apartment is located and then walk the same path each and every day to your apartment....most people could do it
blind....her mistake and it is reasonable was to park on the wrong level...one level up from where she should have parked.

also one needs to understand this was a very rare case...probably the only one like it...a police officer inadvertently goes to the wrong apartment ....starts to put her key in and lo and behold the door opens...obviously ajar...so she takes 2 quick steps through the door into the dark apt. where the lights are not on...and immediately sees the silouhette of a human figure...can you imagine the shock? Most folks would be scared shitless and take off running...but she was a police officer trained to handle situations like being confronted with a threat and she knew how to deal with it....she told the suspect to show his hands....he refused, instead he began to yell at her and advance towards her...big mistake on his part.

Now in his defense he was no doubt shocked also and according to some ...smoking marijuana...which may have contributed to his irrational behavior aka failing to follow the orders of a uniformed police officer. He had to know she was a police officer but she had no clue to who he was....thus she perceived a threat to her life and rightly so...he could have been a burglar, rapist or who knows what. A definite threat at any rate and then he refuses to show his hands....a good shot.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Plenty of malice on display here, afore and after thought. Murderous, depraved hearts. Mental states purposely, knowingly, and recklessly manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.

Obviously you do not know what malice is.

Here, let me help you out?


mal·ice
/ˈmaləs/

noun

1. the intention or desire to do evil; ill will.
   "I bear no malice toward anybody"

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Well, after all, he had a deadly weapon, a spoon and a presumably frozen hard ice cream carton....

Or he could have smothered her with the cushions from the sofa.

 

[rightwinger]

Her decision to fire was careless and unnecessary
It got her fired from her job

Bullshitte she fired to defend her life. She was fired because of politics....the politicians always cave into the blacks in a case like this.

Actually, her life was never in danger

She fired without assessing the situation
She shot a man sitting on his couch

You only know that by hindsight....in her mind she thought she was in her apartment and thus confronted by a stranger who put her into a fear for her life...just a mistake...not murder.

And that is what the jury had to decide. Was her fear reasonable? Was her response reasonable?

The jury said NO

The 6 blacks, 4 Hispanics and 2 whites? That jury?

A valid jury which was unanimous in its decision

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Well, after all, he had a deadly weapon, a spoon and a presumably frozen hard ice cream carton....

Or he could have smothered her with the cushions from the sofa.

Laugh about it when you come home and find your door open and someone in there in the dark.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Bullshitte she fired to defend her life. She was fired because of politics....the politicians always cave into the blacks in a case like this.

Actually, her life was never in danger

She fired without assessing the situation
She shot a man sitting on his couch

You only know that by hindsight....in her mind she thought she was in her apartment and thus confronted by a stranger who put her into a fear for her life...just a mistake...not murder.

And that is what the jury had to decide. Was her fear reasonable? Was her response reasonable?

The jury said NO

The 6 blacks, 4 Hispanics and 2 whites? That jury?

A valid jury which was unanimous in its decision

6 africans, 4 Mexicans and 2 liberal whites

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Which link are you referring to?

A current, authoritative source saying for “criminal trespass” in Texas:
"

• You must have acted intentionally
• There must have been some notice posted or you were asked to leave
• You must be physically present on the property"

Exactly....as in .........'you must have acted intentionally' meaning you must have intended to trespass....she had no such intent....she simply made a mistake.....and that is all there is to it...she made a mistake....a very big mistake she went to someone elses apartment...a tragic mistake for both parties. But that is all it was a huge tragic mistake....yet the state wants to send her to prison because she made a mistake.....who said it? To err is human.

Deadly mistakes happen all the time...usually in traffic cases but other ways also...look up the stats on accidental deaths each year....shit happens.....get over it. Do not try to rectify the death of one innocent person by jailing another innocent person.

His brother had it right....he did not want her to go to jail....if the victims brother can say that...it should be very easy for everyone else to say the same.

Unfortunately, too many folks on here are consumed with hatred...mostly negroes i think but a good share of misguided white folk also.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Actually, her life was never in danger

She fired without assessing the situation
She shot a man sitting on his couch

You only know that by hindsight....in her mind she thought she was in her apartment and thus confronted by a stranger who put her into a fear for her life...just a mistake...not murder.

And that is what the jury had to decide. Was her fear reasonable? Was her response reasonable?

The jury said NO

The 6 blacks, 4 Hispanics and 2 whites? That jury?

A valid jury which was unanimous in its decision

6 africans, 4 Mexicans and 2 liberal whites

A receipe for disaster....how in the world did the defense team allow that to occur?

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Well, after all, he had a deadly weapon, a spoon and a presumably frozen hard ice cream carton....

Or he could have smothered her with the cushions from the sofa.

Laugh about it when you come home and find your door open and someone in there in the dark.

Exactly, all these misguided folk should try and put themselves in her shoes.

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Well, after all, he had a deadly weapon, a spoon and a presumably frozen hard ice cream carton....

Or he could have smothered her with the cushions from the sofa.

Laugh about it when you come home and find your door open and someone in there in the dark.

I would be gone in a second...out the door and probably down the street...and safe.

 

[Vandalshandle]

She being so confused to the point she didn't know where she was, does not justify her actions.

Not a good description of that event. She was not confused per se....just like a lot of folks when they have a lot on their mind and after having worked a l3 hr shift she was not focused real well....when you live in a big apartment building like that...you get into a rouotine park at a certain level on which your apartment is located and then walk the same path each and every day to your apartment....most people could do it
blind....her mistake and it is reasonable was to park on the wrong level...one level up from where she should have parked.

also one needs to understand this was a very rare case...probably the only one like it...a police officer inadvertently goes to the wrong apartment ....starts to put her key in and lo and behold the door opens...obviously ajar...so she takes 2 quick steps through the door into the dark apt. where the lights are not on...and immediately sees the silouhette of a human figure...can you imagine the shock? Most folks would be scared shitless and take off running...but she was a police officer trained to handle situations like being confronted with a threat and she knew how to deal with it....she told the suspect to show his hands....he refused, instead he began to yell at her and advance towards her...big mistake on his part.

Now in his defense he was no doubt shocked also and according to some ...smoking marijuana...which may have contributed to his irrational behavior aka failing to follow the orders of a uniformed police officer. He had to know she was a police officer but she had no clue to who he was....thus she perceived a threat to her life and rightly so...he could have been a burglar, rapist or who knows what. A definite threat at any rate and then he refuses to show his hands....a good shot.

Well, sitting in his apartment on the couch eating ice cream sure sounds like a capital offense to me!

 

[Skylar]

Which link are you referring to?

A current, authoritative source saying for “criminal trespass” in Texas:
"

• You must have acted intentionally
• There must have been some notice posted or you were asked to leave
• You must be physically present on the property"

Exactly....as in .........'you must have acted intentionally' meaning you must have intended to trespass....she had no such intent....she simply made a mistake.....and that is all there is to it...she made a mistake....a very big mistake she went to someone elses apartment...a tragic mistake for both parties. But that is all it was a huge tragic mistake....yet the state wants to send her to prison because she made a mistake.....who said it? To err is human.

Nope. 'Innocent Trespass' is a tort standard for determining civil liability in States like Georgia and Virginia.

Texas doesn't recognize 'innocent trespass'. And it certainly doesn't apply a tort standard from another State to criminal proceedings on homicide.

Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Amber did not carelessly kill the black guy.....she took aim and hit her target nothing carless about that...her target was perceived by her as a threat to her life and reasonably so because she believed she was in her apartment....a honest mistake.

To accuse her of murder would be to negate the law on self defense.

Her decision to fire was careless and unnecessary
It got her fired from her job

Bullshitte she fired to defend her life. She was fired because of politics....the politicians always cave into the blacks in a case like this.

Actually, her life was never in danger

She fired without assessing the situation
She shot a man sitting on his couch

You only know that by hindsight....in her mind she thought she was in her apartment and thus confronted by a stranger who put her into a fear for her life...just a mistake...not murder.

And that is what the jury had to decide. Was her fear reasonable? Was her response reasonable?

The jury said NO

Right but they were in error.....this will be rectified upon appeal. Juries often get it wrong.

 

[Skylar]

Her decision to fire was careless and unnecessary
It got her fired from her job

Bullshitte she fired to defend her life. She was fired because of politics....the politicians always cave into the blacks in a case like this.

Actually, her life was never in danger

She fired without assessing the situation
She shot a man sitting on his couch

You only know that by hindsight....in her mind she thought she was in her apartment and thus confronted by a stranger who put her into a fear for her life...just a mistake...not murder.

And that is what the jury had to decide. Was her fear reasonable? Was her response reasonable?

The jury said NO

Right but they were in error.....this will be rectified upon appeal. Juries often get it wrong.

Says you, citing yourself.

And as you've demonstrated, you have no idea what you're talking about. You laughably insisted that Texas had to apply the Georgia State legal principle of 'innocent trespass', a tort standard used to determine civil liability and damages. Texas doesn't recognize 'innocent trespass'. ANd they certianly don't apply it to criminal proceedings.

Worse, you insisted the Texas jury was bound to the 'malice standard' of murder. Yet Texas statutes on murder don't use the malice standard. The word 'malice' isn't used once in their entire statute on criminal homicide, including murder.

Sorry, Green....but your meaningless pseudo-legal gibberish doesn't override the lawful determination of a jury.

Get used to the idea.

 

[TheGreenHornet]

Which link are you referring to?

A current, authoritative source saying for “criminal trespass” in Texas:
"

• You must have acted intentionally
• There must have been some notice posted or you were asked to leave
• You must be physically present on the property"

Exactly....as in .........'you must have acted intentionally' meaning you must have intended to trespass....she had no such intent....she simply made a mistake.....and that is all there is to it...she made a mistake....a very big mistake she went to someone elses apartment...a tragic mistake for both parties. But that is all it was a huge tragic mistake....yet the state wants to send her to prison because she made a mistake.....who said it? To err is human.

Nope. 'Innocent Trespass' is a tort standard for determining civil liability in States like Georgia and Virginia.

Texas doesn't recognize 'innocent trespass'. And it certainly doesn't apply a tort standard from another State to criminal proceedings on homicide.

Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Nonsense it can be a tort or criminal in nature....aka a burglar

PENAL CODE CHAPTER 30. BURGLARY AND CRIMINAL TRESPASS

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

Anyhow....Amber had no malice towards the black guy....murder requires malice.

None? Putting a bullet in his heart is rather malicious.

 

[Skylar]

Which link are you referring to?

A current, authoritative source saying for “criminal trespass” in Texas:
"

• You must have acted intentionally
• There must have been some notice posted or you were asked to leave
• You must be physically present on the property"

Exactly....as in .........'you must have acted intentionally' meaning you must have intended to trespass....she had no such intent....she simply made a mistake.....and that is all there is to it...she made a mistake....a very big mistake she went to someone elses apartment...a tragic mistake for both parties. But that is all it was a huge tragic mistake....yet the state wants to send her to prison because she made a mistake.....who said it? To err is human.

Nope. 'Innocent Trespass' is a tort standard for determining civil liability in States like Georgia and Virginia.

Texas doesn't recognize 'innocent trespass'. And it certainly doesn't apply a tort standard from another State to criminal proceedings on homicide.

Remember, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Nonsense it can be a tort or criminal in nature....aka a burglar

PENAL CODE CHAPTER 30. BURGLARY AND CRIMINAL TRESPASS

Nope. There's not a single mention of 'innocent trespass' in the entire statute you cited. Texas doesn't recognize the concept. And it certainly doesn't apply a tort standard from Georgia to its criminal homicide proceedings.

Remember, Green......you're a pseudo-legal incompetent. It tends to hamper your arguments regarding the law.