Reactions to Kyle verdict define different views of the meaning of “justice.”

[LeftofLeft]

The people that are upset about the verdict are the same people that turn a blind eye to burning, looting, beating, and murdering. It doesn’t matter how many livelihoods are destroyed, innocent drivers dragged and beaten, Molotov cocktails thrown, or even people gunned down for protecting their property, all of this really boils down to the Left does not like people who don’t think like them to use guns for protection and self defense. It’s that simple.

 

[struth]

The people that are upset about the verdict are the same people that turn a blind eye to burning, looting, beating, and murdering. It doesn’t matter how many livelihoods are destroyed, innocent drivers dragged and beaten, Molotov cocktails thrown, or even people gunned down for protecting their property, all of this really boils down to the Left does not like people who don’t think like them to use guns for protection and self defense. It’s that simple.

The DNC cultist don’t like the verdict because they were told by their cult leaders and propagandist not to like the verdict. They will ignore all the evidence, all the facts, all reality in order to follow what their cult leader has told them

Some on this forum are claiming it was a peaceful protest of an unjust police shooting of a innocent black man…can you imagine that??

 

[OKTexas]

Kyle Rittenhouse never threatened anyone. If you watched the trial and saw all the live videos you wouldn't say such a stupid thing. Either that or you saw all that and refused to apply critical thinking and instead used hysterical emotional thinking.

This has nothing to do with George Zimmarman but nice try at obfuscation.

Kyle helped remove graffiti, was trying to give first aid to folks and was not threatening anyone. A convicted child molester and crazy person (Rosenbaum) did not like the way Rittenhouse looked (Just like you just said, because he had a gun) and threatened to kill him. Later Rosenbaum was seen chasing Rittenhouse who was actively trying to get away from him. As it happened, Rittenhouse ran into a wall of people and Rosenbaum caught up with him and tried to grab Rittenhouse's gun at which point Rittenhouse, fearing for his life, shot Rosenbaum. Clearly self defense.

The other two perps (one who threatened him with a gun and one who attacked him with a skateboad) attacked Rittenhouse who was again running away from them. Rittenhouse defended himself, clearly self defense.

There was no evidence presented that he was a white supremacist, that he shot and killed any black person, or that he went there to stir up trouble.

Now, stop spreading your stupid lies because you are either ignorant or just wanting to stir up violence. If you had any shame you should be ashamed of yourself.

The foreign bitch gets all her info from mslsd. That's why she talks like she's on LSD.

.

.

 

[Theowl32]

There is only one way to shut them up and that is to literally shut them up. Just like the Ferguson crap , they ignore all of the facts and parrot what they are told to say by their overlords who instruct them through their pets in the media.

They cannot see. Their sight has been taken from their. They cannot hear cause their ability to listen has been taken from them.

Isn't this beyond clear? No need to even communicate with any of them anymore.

Arm yourselves .

 

[surada]

another adjective is demafascist, cult boy, or dem voter

You might want to look at a dictionary.

 

[struth]

You might want to look at a dictionary.

oh you don’t know what the word adjective means?

 

[surada]

Kyle Rittenhouse never threatened anyone. If you watched the trial and saw all the live videos you wouldn't say such a stupid thing. Either that or you saw all that and refused to apply critical thinking and instead used hysterical emotional thinking.

This has nothing to do with George Zimmarman but nice try at obfuscation.

Kyle helped remove graffiti, was trying to give first aid to folks and was not threatening anyone. A convicted child molester and crazy person (Rosenbaum) did not like the way Rittenhouse looked (Just like you just said, because he had a gun) and threatened to kill him. Later Rosenbaum was seen chasing Rittenhouse who was actively trying to get away from him. As it happened, Rittenhouse ran into a wall of people and Rosenbaum caught up with him and tried to grab Rittenhouse's gun at which point Rittenhouse, fearing for his life, shot Rosenbaum. Clearly self defense.

The other two perps (one who threatened him with a gun and one who attacked him with a skateboad) attacked Rittenhouse who was again running away from them. Rittenhouse defended himself, clearly self defense.

There was no evidence presented that he was a white supremacist, that he shot and killed any black person, or that he went there to stir up trouble.

Now, stop spreading your stupid lies because you are either ignorant or just wanting to stir up violence. If you had any shame you should be ashamed of yourself.

What did Kyle use to remove graffiti?

 

[surada]

oh you don’t know what the word adjective means?

Look up the word Yahoo. .. its from Johnathan Swift.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
They rightly went after him because he was carrying a RIFLE.
They had a right to and should have gone after him for carrying a RIFLE.

They had no right to go after him for that.

The legal experts prove he was not carrying illegally

You are wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Read it yourself.

{...

2015 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations​

948. Crimes against children.​

948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.​

Universal Citation: WI Stat § 948.60 (2015)
948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

948.60(1)(1) In this section, "dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.

948.60(2) (2)

948.60(2)(a)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

948.60(2)(b) (b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.

948.60(2)(c) (c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.

948.60(2)(d) (d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.

948.60(3) (3)

948.60(3)(a)(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.

948.60(3)(b) (b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.

948.60(3)(c) (c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.

History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.

Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).
...}

Clearly Kyle was guilty.

The legal experts prove you ignorant and wrong you are no expert

 

[2aguy]

Wrong.
They rightly went after him because he was carrying a RIFLE.
They had a right to and should have gone after him for carrying a RIFLE.

They didn't go after him because he had a rifle, you doofus........he was one of a large group with rifles...they went after him because he was alone, and he was attempting to put out the fires they started...fires they wanted to use to blow up a gas station.....

 

[2aguy]

Wrong.
Read it yourself.

{...

2015 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations​

948. Crimes against children.​

948.60 Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.​

Universal Citation: WI Stat § 948.60 (2015)
948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

948.60(1)(1) In this section, "dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.

948.60(2) (2)

948.60(2)(a)(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.

948.60(2)(b) (b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.

948.60(2)(c) (c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.

948.60(2)(d) (d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.

948.60(3) (3)

948.60(3)(a)(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.

948.60(3)(b) (b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.

948.60(3)(c) (c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.

History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.

Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998 (1998).
...}

Clearly Kyle was guilty.

Yeah.....you left out the relevant parts...the parts the actual lawyers pointed out in court, and why the judge dismissed the weapon charge...

He was over 16 and the rifle wasn't short barreled.......the two relevant parts of the law...that you failed to quote.

 

[struth]

Look up the word Yahoo. .. its from Johnathan Swift.

i did…it’s another great adjective to describe the folks i mentioned…really almost a synonym

 

[surada]

They didn't go after him because he had a rifle, you doofus........he was one of a large group with rifles...they went after him because Youhe was alone, and he was attempting to put out the fires they started...fires they wanted to use to blow up a gas station.....

You mean the dumpster fire?

 

[surada]

i did…it’s another great adjective to describe the folks i mentioned…really almost a synonym

Yahoo is a noun.

a word invented by Jonathan Swift: ‘yahoo’ – word histories

a word invented by Jonathan Swift: ‘yahoo’

‘yahoo’: rude, noisy or violent person—word invented by Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) as the name of a race of brutish creatures resembling men in Gulliver’s Travels (1726)—came to be applied to the o…

wordhistories.net

Mar 02, 2018 · The noun yahoo denotes a rude, noisy or violent person—cf. also bully. It was invented by the Irish satirist, poet and Anglican cleric Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) as the name of a race of brutish creatures resembling men, ruled by the houyhnhnms, described as horses endowed with reason, in Travels into several remote Nations of the World. In four Parts.

 

[2aguy]

The minute I saw the video it was clear that the protesters or rioters threatened his life and also went after him, so to me even though I'm anti gun and anti racists which most of those that were armed are clearly far right nutjobs. I think he had every right to defend himself, that been said he should've been prosecuted for owning a gun at 17 and also defying a curfew.

I also agree that there should be racial justice and the racists should be shunned and prosecuted, but also those that burn loot and destroy properties should also prosecuted.

But here is something that most of you won't understand and will probably never enjoy, is the beauty of living in a gun free country...many of us the rest of the world did and guess what? We also had demonstrations, clashes and riots but hardly any end up with killings because simply we didn't have deadly weapons available to use, so few bruises and cuts here and there and everyone gets to go home. But I know to deaf ears, love your guns but count your bodies !!!

but hardly any end up with killings

You mean except for the 12 million innocent men, women and children murdered by the European governments under socialist occupation from 1939-1945..........except for them...right...

Rounded up and murdered...by their governments....after they had their guns taken away from them in the 1920s and 30s.......

In those 6 years, more innocent people were murdered than in 87 years of murder with guns in the U.S.........and of those murdered in the U.S. by guns, the vast majority are criminals murdered by other criminals....while in Europe, the vast majority of those murdered were people handed over to the socialists by their governments ....innocent people...

So sell that crap to Biden voters...

 

[2aguy]

You mean the dumpster fire?

Yes...the dumpster the child rapist was pushing against gas pumps....

 

[struth]

Yahoo is a noun.

a word invented by Jonathan Swift: ‘yahoo’ – word histories

a word invented by Jonathan Swift: ‘yahoo’

‘yahoo’: rude, noisy or violent person—word invented by Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) as the name of a race of brutish creatures resembling men in Gulliver’s Travels (1726)—came to be applied to the o…

wordhistories.net

Mar 02, 2018 · The noun yahoo denotes a rude, noisy or violent person—cf. also bully. It was invented by the Irish satirist, poet and Anglican cleric Jonathan Swift (1667-1745) as the name of a race of brutish creatures resembling men, ruled by the houyhnhnms, described as horses endowed with reason, in Travels into several remote Nations of the World. In four Parts.

Ah yes when capitalized it is

 

[surada]

The minute I saw the video it was clear that the protesters or rioters threatened his life and also went after him, so to me even though I'm anti gun and anti racists which most of those that were armed are clearly far right nutjobs. I think he had every right to defend himself, that been said he should've been prosecuted for owning a gun at 17 and also defying a curfew.

I also agree that there should be racial justice and the racists should be shunned and prosecuted, but also those that burn loot and destroy properties should also prosecuted.

But here is something that most of you won't understand and will probably never enjoy, is the beauty of living in a gun free country...many of us the rest of the world did and guess what? We also had demonstrations, clashes and riots but hardly any end up with killings because simply we didn't have deadly weapons available to use, so few bruises and cuts here and there and everyone gets to go home. But I know to deaf ears, love your guns but count your bodies !!!

Hannity is working on a short film of Kyle's life.

Justice hasn't served this boy. He'll do this again.

 

[struth]

You mean the dumpster fire?

I believe it was a Duramax truck the yahoo demafascist were starting