Read The Closed-Door Hearing Transcripts Here

[BluesLegend]

A U.S. ambassador was killed during your Benghazi fiasco fool.

And how many ambassadors died under Dubya Bush's reign? Ask Alexa if you don't. Ask her to give you a history lesson on all the Americans who were killed abroad under the Bush administration.

Why don't you start a thread on that, we are discussing Obama's incompetence and Benghazi.

- totally f'n clueless ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^ here's another liberal who flunked out in the 8th grade.

and the title of the thread was what ?

gfy sparky.

Oh good lord, you realize I was having a conversation with someone else who brought up Benghazi right. Damn you libs are dumb.

 

[22lcidw]

The tards were whining about the hearings being closed. It was explained to them dozens of times why those hearings were closed.

Then they parroted the lie that Republicans weren't allowed to question the witnesses. Now these transcripts will explode that lie once and for all.

That's why they won't read them. That, and they are longer than a tweet and their poor little pointy heads can't deal.

The poor parroting rubes are choking on the transparency they demanded.

You believe you have an untarnished and shiny reputation. Your politicians are the worst scuzzballs we have. Many do not even believe the suey porker excrement they spew. They change their minds on issues when given the script by the prog Pravda every morning. Half the population even believes in massive tax increases on themselves as socialism will enrich us all due to the propaganda you shit from your diseased azzes. And when they actually feel it they will vote you out faster then you can say Grey Davis. At least that nut bag was recalled. We will have to wait to remove as many as the tentacles as we can. It is going to pay to actually take courses on collecting free stuff rather then earning anything. Many do now. Anyway, we don't believe you. You stole our social security by not agreeing to budget restraints decades ago. And you will enable rules and laws that will limit social security and medicare benefits to the aged soon enough.

 

[Siete]

And how many ambassadors died under Dubya Bush's reign? Ask Alexa if you don't. Ask her to give you a history lesson on all the Americans who were killed abroad under the Bush administration.

Why don't you start a thread on that, we are discussing Obama's incompetence and Benghazi.

- totally f'n clueless ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^ here's another liberal who flunked out in the 8th grade.

and the title of the thread was what ?

gfy sparky.

Oh good lord, you realize I was having a conversation with someone else who brought up Benghazi right. Damn you libs are dumb.

then take your own f'n suggestion and start another thread AFTER you red the rules about trolling.

ya fumbduck .

 

[Hellokitty]

Michael McKinley's hearing transcript: Michael McKinley transcript: Read full text of former Pompeo adviser's testimony in Trump impeachment inquiry — live updates - CBS News

Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch's hearing transcript: Yovanovitch transcript.pdf

No one is going to read hundreds of pages of testimony, so since this is your thread why don't you highlight which pages you think prove a crime committed by TRUMP?

We'll wait...

 

[BluesLegend]

Why don't you start a thread on that, we are discussing Obama's incompetence and Benghazi.

- totally f'n clueless ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^ here's another liberal who flunked out in the 8th grade.

and the title of the thread was what ?

gfy sparky.

Oh good lord, you realize I was having a conversation with someone else who brought up Benghazi right. Damn you libs are dumb.

then take your own f'n suggestion and start another thread AFTER you red the rules about trolling.

ya fumbduck .

You seem angry and triggered.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Michael McKinley's hearing transcript: Michael McKinley transcript: Read full text of former Pompeo adviser's testimony in Trump impeachment inquiry — live updates - CBS News

Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch's hearing transcript: Yovanovitch transcript.pdf

/——/ Aren’t you Progs rejecting the transcript claiming it’s only a summary? Why should we accept Shytface’s summarizations?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why are Dem's scared shitless of the whistleblower testifying and being subject to cross examination hmmm?

The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point, dope.

Their story has been corroborated many times over.

Then you should have no problem with our side questioning him under oath.

To what end? It's not necessary to question the motives of the guy who called 911 when the fire dept is on the scene and fighting the fire.
More like you wish to leak their identity in an effort to impugne their reputation in violation of federal law.

 

[Siete]

- totally f'n clueless ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^ here's another liberal who flunked out in the 8th grade.

and the title of the thread was what ?

gfy sparky.

Oh good lord, you realize I was having a conversation with someone else who brought up Benghazi right. Damn you libs are dumb.

then take your own f'n suggestion and start another thread AFTER you red the rules about trolling.

ya fumbduck .

You seem angry and triggered.

you seem dumb as a rock.

 

[BluesLegend]

Why are Dem's scared shitless of the whistleblower testifying and being subject to cross examination hmmm?

The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point, dope.

Their story has been corroborated many times over.

Then you should have no problem with our side questioning him under oath.

To what end? It's not necessary to question the motives of the guy who called 911 when the fire dept is on the scene and fighting the fire.
More like you wish to leak their identity in an effort to impugne their reputation in violation of federal law.

The president has a constitutional right to face his accuser or have you forgotten that?

 

[g5000]

Michael McKinley's hearing transcript: Michael McKinley transcript: Read full text of former Pompeo adviser's testimony in Trump impeachment inquiry — live updates - CBS News

Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch's hearing transcript: Yovanovitch transcript.pdf

No one is going to read hundreds of pages of testimony

I'm reading them. What I think you meant to say is that no parroting Trump rube will read them.

 

[BluesLegend]

^^^ here's another liberal who flunked out in the 8th grade.

and the title of the thread was what ?

gfy sparky.

Oh good lord, you realize I was having a conversation with someone else who brought up Benghazi right. Damn you libs are dumb.

then take your own f'n suggestion and start another thread AFTER you red the rules about trolling.

ya fumbduck .

You seem angry and triggered.

you seem dumb as a rock.

Says the poster who acts like a mentally ill lunatic.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why are Dem's scared shitless of the whistleblower testifying and being subject to cross examination hmmm?

The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point, dope.

Their story has been corroborated many times over.

Then you should have no problem with our side questioning him under oath.

To what end? It's not necessary to question the motives of the guy who called 911 when the fire dept is on the scene and fighting the fire.
More like you wish to leak their identity in an effort to impugne their reputation in violation of federal law.

The president has a constitutional right to face his accuser or have you forgotten that?

He doesn't ,dope.

Whistleblower identities are protected under federal law.

 

[BluesLegend]

I'm reading them. What I think you meant to say is that no parroting Trump rube will read them.

Why would we bother reading fabricated Dem propaganda? Grow a pair and just admit it, the fix was in before the first 'witness' testified.

 

[BluesLegend]

Why are Dem's scared shitless of the whistleblower testifying and being subject to cross examination hmmm?

The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point, dope.

Their story has been corroborated many times over.

Then you should have no problem with our side questioning him under oath.

To what end? It's not necessary to question the motives of the guy who called 911 when the fire dept is on the scene and fighting the fire.
More like you wish to leak their identity in an effort to impugne their reputation in violation of federal law.

The president has a constitutional right to face his accuser or have you forgotten that?

He doesn't ,dope.

Whistleblower identities are protected under federal law.

The SCOTUS says you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[Stormy Daniels]

These "transcripts" are not complete

Evidence?

 

[WEATHER53]

These "transcripts" are not complete

Evidence?

We are going to try our feelings for just once

 

[Picaro]

Okay, so the latest from the Scum Left is their Big Giant Whistleblower didn't actually hear anything after all, but is willing to claim he might have heard about some stuff elsewhere and will keep up babbling this innuendo as long as Democrats keep paying him and help him commit perjury without going to jail later.

So, it will be least 2024 before they ever get around to finally admitting they have zilch, and then try and get Bridgett Fonda elected President.

 

[Picaro]

I'm reading them. What I think you meant to say is that no parroting Trump rube will read them.

Why would we bother reading fabricated Dem propaganda? Grow a pair and just admit it, the fix was in before the first 'witness' testified.

It's hilarious how long they keep these threads going; 'Posting Last' is their only possible refuge at this point. lol

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point, dope.

Their story has been corroborated many times over.

Then you should have no problem with our side questioning him under oath.

To what end? It's not necessary to question the motives of the guy who called 911 when the fire dept is on the scene and fighting the fire.
More like you wish to leak their identity in an effort to impugne their reputation in violation of federal law.

The president has a constitutional right to face his accuser or have you forgotten that?

He doesn't ,dope.

Whistleblower identities are protected under federal law.

The SCOTUS says you don't know what you are talking about.

More like you don't know what you're talking about.

There's been a dozen witnesses who've corroborated the whistleblower's claim. The whistleblower is irrelevant at this point and any attempt to out them would only be seen as punative and retaliatory.

Give it up.

 

[Picaro]

These "transcripts" are not complete

Evidence?

We are going to try our feelings for just once

Indeed. Why waste our time when they can't post anything remotely credible themselves?