Reagan exposed as a racist in newly released recording.

“Reagan exposed as a racist in newly released recording.”

Actually not.

The fact that Reagan was a racist is well documented; the newly released recording is further confirmation of that fact.


Reagan was a great man and a greater President.


Your inability to admit that, reflects poorly on you.


the funniest lie of the century.
:lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha::haha:

I thought only Crusader Retard and USMB's resident troll Political Chic who EVERYBODY knows worships the REPUBLICANS and NEVER says one word about their corruption,only the dems are corrupt in HER warped mind , were THIS stupid. :rolleyes:add ONE MORE to the list of stupid fuck resident trolls of USMB that worship asswipe mass murderer Reagan.

the three stooges.:haha: same as those two peas in a pod,a troll who cowardly evades evidence and goes by what the corrupt school system and corporate media taught him.



Are you old enough to remember when leftards like you, vicious attacked Reagan for predicting that the Soviet Union would fall?



When I was a youth, it was an accepted fact that the USSR would never fail, because the people behind the Iron Curtain loved Tyranny just like Americans loved Freedom.

Reagan's idea, that victory over Liberal Despotism was not possible but desirable, was very provocative.

Of course, the libs were full of shit, the people of Eastern Europe were no different that Americans, and loved freedom too.


And let's face it, the libs here, many, if not most, were somewhat sympathetic to the Soviet Union, so they took Reagan's prediction as a personal insult.


They "knew" that the nature "progress" of mankind would be to the Left, and that Reagan was an old fool.


That history proved him right, and them wrong, is what still burns them to this day. They hate him more than anyone, because of that.
 
Throughout my 72 years, I have found political conservatives to be among the most racist individuals around.....


Stopped reading here. Bored. YOu lose. Loser.
Stopped reading here. Bored. YOu lose. Loser.
Do you comprehend what you don't read, Rube?

Inside the Government's Racial Bias Case Against Donald Trump's Company, and How He Fought It

"For Trump, whose statements as a presidential candidate about Mexican immigrants, women and Muslims have drawn charges of racism and sexism, his role as a defendant in a discrimination case put him near the center of a civil rights-era struggle over society’s changing views about race and culture.
90

"The 20-month legal battle marked the first time Trump became a regular presence on newspaper front pages. It served as an early look at the hardball tactics he has employed in business and, more recently, in politics.

"And its resolution showed how Trump, even in the heat of battle, is often willing to strike a deal."

Trump’s Long War with Justice


1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences ('When Donald and Ivana came to the casino, the bosses would order all the black people off the floor,' a former employee of Trump’s Castle, in Atlantic City, New Jersey, told a writer for The New Yorker).

"Trump emerged as a political force owing to his full-throated embrace of 'birtherism,' the false charge that the nation’s first black president, Barack Obama, was not born in the United States.

"His presidential campaign was fueled by nativist sentiment directed at nonwhite immigrants, and he proposed barring Muslims from entering the country. In 2016, Trump described himself to The Washington Post as 'the least racist person that you’ve ever encountered.'"

An Oral History of Trump’s Bigotry

Trump and his racist base are burying the GOP.
Good riddance.
 
Stopped reading here. Bored. YOu lose. Loser.
Stopped reading here. Bored. YOu lose. Loser.
Do you comprehend what you don't read, Rube?

Inside the Government's Racial Bias Case Against Donald Trump's Company, and How He Fought It

"For Trump, whose statements as a presidential candidate about Mexican immigrants, women and Muslims have drawn charges of racism and sexism, his role as a defendant in a discrimination case put him near the center of a civil rights-era struggle over society’s changing views about race and culture.
90

"The 20-month legal battle marked the first time Trump became a regular presence on newspaper front pages. It served as an early look at the hardball tactics he has employed in business and, more recently, in politics.

"And its resolution showed how Trump, even in the heat of battle, is often willing to strike a deal."

Trump’s Long War with Justice


1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
 
Here again we see the liberal double-standard: one standard for Democrats and a very different for Republicans. They take one private conversation that Reagan had with Nixon and argue that it proves he was a racist, but they seem to have no interest in the credible reports of multiple racist comments made by the Clintons.
 
Do you comprehend what you don't read, Rube?

Inside the Government's Racial Bias Case Against Donald Trump's Company, and How He Fought It

"For Trump, whose statements as a presidential candidate about Mexican immigrants, women and Muslims have drawn charges of racism and sexism, his role as a defendant in a discrimination case put him near the center of a civil rights-era struggle over society’s changing views about race and culture.
90

"The 20-month legal battle marked the first time Trump became a regular presence on newspaper front pages. It served as an early look at the hardball tactics he has employed in business and, more recently, in politics.

"And its resolution showed how Trump, even in the heat of battle, is often willing to strike a deal."

Trump’s Long War with Justice


1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."
 
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."

For the record, the teens did confess. Further, Donald J. Trump wasn't involved in the investigation or interrogation of the subjects and was only assuming that the Liberal Politicians of his hometown had fingered the right perpetrators.
 
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
1973? LOL!!!!

Say, how often did you tell your dad, how to do his job?
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
 
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.


The fact that no one else has ever been convicted of this crime, tells me its probably just bullshit.

The teens may well have done it, otherwise, Warren Wilhelm would have his men out of the street looking for the "Real" assailants. They aren't, the city has forgotten about the real victim here, and the libs have washed their hands of it.
 
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."

For the record, the teens did confess. Further, Donald J. Trump wasn't involved in the investigation or interrogation of the subjects and was only assuming that the Liberal Politicians of his hometown had fingered the right perpetrators.
For the record, the teens did confess. Further, Donald J. Trump wasn't involved in the investigation or interrogation of the subjects and was only assuming that the Liberal Politicians of his hometown had fingered the right perpetrators.
For the record, all confessions were obtained under duress and all defendants withdrew those confessions after being allowed access to legal counsel.

Donald J. Trump reacted like a true white supremacist by assuming the guilt of five non-white defendants without knowing anything about the under lying evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"Prosecution of the five remaining defendants in the rape and assault case was based primarily on confessions which they had made after police interrogations.

"None had counsel during this questioning.

"Within weeks, they each withdrew these confessions, pleaded not guilty, and refused plea deals on the rape and assault charges...."

"In 2001, Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist serving life in prison, confessed to officials that he had raped the female jogger.

"His DNA matched that found at the scene, and he provided other confirmatory evidence.

"He said he committed the rape alone.[3]

"Reyes could not be prosecuted for raping Meili, because the statute of limitations had passed.

"In 2002 Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney for New York County, had his office conduct an investigation and recommended to the state court that the convictions of the five men on all charges be vacated.

"The court vacated their convictions in 2002, and the state withdrew all charges against the men."
 
My dad was never a KKK supporter, and I was never president of his company.
....ps


Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"
 
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
Got it. Never. I would dismiss any reports from when Trump was working for his DAD, as evidence against Trump.


You got anything from when Trump was actually in charge, or you just full of shit?
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
 
There was no DNA evidence to convict Brett Kavanaugh of having Rape Train Parties in Montgomery County. Yet 48 hard core leftists voted to ruin his life over it.

I really don't have patience for libs who think nothing of ruining other children's lives on less than nothing, complain about police procedures with the Central Park 5
 
You are way beyond delusional if you believe Trump and his dad were not racists:
whistling.jpg

"In the years since then, Trump has assembled a long record of comment on issues involving African Americans as well as Mexicans, Hispanics more broadly, Native Americans, Muslims, Jews, immigrants, women, and people with disabilities.

"His statements have been reflected in his behavior—from public acts (placing ads calling for the execution of five young black and Latino men accused of rape, who were later shown to be innocent) to private preferences .....e.



They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?
trump-supporters-are-calling-anti-trump-people-bi-2-3957-1478814046-4_dblbig.jpg
 
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?...


What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?

I would certainly think that that one, is under an obligation to prove he was not there. Since, he admitted that he was there. And helped rape the woman.


You can shove your race baiting up your ass, you piece of shit.
 
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.


The actions of you libs, in releasing them, was a hideous injustice to their victim and to the women they will victimize in the future.


You are disgusting that you support releasing rapists into our communities.
They were not shown to be innocent. It was always known that additional rapists had raped that woman and escaped.


That one was found, in no way clears the 5 that were already caught.
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?
trump-supporters-are-calling-anti-trump-people-bi-2-3957-1478814046-4_dblbig.jpg





Ultra-liberal New York City has a "white supremacist justice system"? What does that say about the Far Left and the Democrat Party?
 
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?
trump-supporters-are-calling-anti-trump-people-bi-2-3957-1478814046-4_dblbig.jpg





Ultra-liberal New York City has a "white supremacist justice system"? What does that say about the Far Left and the Democrat Party?


I thought about that point too, but you know how simple minded libs are. I had to pick which was the best one to crush him with.


Two points? Way too many for the average lib to grasp.


REally, I'm surprised most of them don't drown when they look up to see where the rain is coming from.


beer.jpg
 
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?...


What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?

I would certainly think that that one, is under an obligation to prove he was not there. Since, he admitted that he was there. And helped rape the woman.


You can shove your race baiting up your ass, you piece of shit.
What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?
Which one was that?
How old was he?
Were any adult family members present when he "confessed?"
Was his "confession" obtained without access to counsel?
 
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?...


What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?

I would certainly think that that one, is under an obligation to prove he was not there. Since, he admitted that he was there. And helped rape the woman.


You can shove your race baiting up your ass, you piece of shit.
What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?
Which one was that?
How old was he?
Were any adult family members present when he "confessed?"
Was his "confession" obtained without access to counsel?



Don't recall. A lot of it was just volunteered. YOu can't blame the cops because some punk they pick up, running wild in the streets, doesn't have his mommy with him.


You know that the juries, all knew that their DNA was NOT found at the scene right? And still found them guilty based on the evidence and their testimony?
 
Trump placed his racist ad calling for their execution BEFORE they were tried and "convicted."
970.jpg

All five were later exonerated of that particular rape based on DNA evidence.

Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"None of the suspects' DNA matched the DNA collected from the crime scene: two semen samples that both belonged to one unidentified man. No substantive physical evidence connected any of the five teenagers to the rape scene, but each was convicted in 1990 of related assault and other charges."


DNA cannot exonerate someone.
DNA cannot exonerate someone.
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?...


What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?

I would certainly think that that one, is under an obligation to prove he was not there. Since, he admitted that he was there. And helped rape the woman.


You can shove your race baiting up your ass, you piece of shit.
Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia

"In 2001, Matias Reyes, a convicted murderer and serial rapist serving life in prison, confessed to officials that he had raped the female jogger. His DNA matched that found at the scene, and he provided other confirmatory evidence.

"|He said he committed the rape alone.[3]

"Reyes could not be prosecuted for raping Meili, because the statute of limitations had passed. In 2002 Robert Morgenthau, District Attorney for New York County, had his office conduct an investigation and recommended to the state court that the convictions of the five men on all charges be vacated.

"The court vacated their convictions in 2002, and the state withdrew all charges against the men."
 
Got a link for that claim?

DNA Exonerations in the United States - Innocence Project

"Fast facts:

  • 1989: The first DNA exoneration took place
  • 365 DNA exonerees to date
  • 37: States where exonerations have been won
  • 14: Average number of years served
  • 5,065.5: Total number of years served
  • 26.6: Average age at the time of wrongful conviction
  • 43: Average age at exoneration
  • 20 of 365 people served time on death row
  • 41 of 365 pled guilty to crimes they did not commit
  • 69%: Involved eyewitness misidentification"


I should say, that DNA cannot, by itself, exonerate someone.


In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
In this case, the DNA does not show that they were not there, just that someone else WAS there.

Which we always knew.

ONly some one irrationally biased in favor of the rapists in question, could look at that evidence, and see anything that "exonerates" the other rapists.
Which "rapists in question" are you referring to?
The ones who were falsely convicted by a white supremacist justice system?
What makes you think they are under any obligation to prove they were not there aside from the color of their skins?...


What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?

I would certainly think that that one, is under an obligation to prove he was not there. Since, he admitted that he was there. And helped rape the woman.


You can shove your race baiting up your ass, you piece of shit.
What about the one that volunteered that he only held her legs down, during the rape?
Which one was that?
How old was he?
Were any adult family members present when he "confessed?"
Was his "confession" obtained without access to counsel?



Don't recall. A lot of it was just volunteered. YOu can't blame the cops because some punk they pick up, running wild in the streets, doesn't have his mommy with him.


You know that the juries, all knew that their DNA was NOT found at the scene right? And still found them guilty based on the evidence and their testimony?
Don't recall. A lot of it was just volunteered. YOu can't blame the cops because some punk they pick up, running wild in the streets, doesn't have his mommy with him.
You can blame cops who interview minors without adult family members or legal counsel present, especially if the cops are racist, white-skinned bigots like Trump.
 

Forum List

Back
Top