Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't get too confused about the GOP's war on women.
It's not a war on THEIR women.
Don't any of you remember back when abortions were illegal?
I do.
Let's go back to the 60's shall we?
I also remember that my rich friends who get knocked op disappeared for a few months and then suddenly their problem was gone.
So when the GOP says they do not want to pay for abortions, do remember they do not want to pay for POOR FOLKS' abortions,
Their gals will be just fine, thanks.
look at the links then come back and run your mouth
Don't get too confused about the GOP's war on women.
It's not a war on THEIR women.
Don't any of you remember back when abortions were illegal?
I do.
Let's go back to the 60's shall we?
I also remember that my rich friends who get knocked op disappeared for a few months and then suddenly their problem was gone.
So when the GOP says they do not want to pay for abortions, do remember they do not want to pay for POOR FOLKS' abortions,
Their gals will be just fine, thanks.
I really must thank you. For proving my point. You only care about women when it comes to politics or is convenient to you. I hope you're happy with yourself, my friend. Frankly if I were you, I'd be ashamed. Women overseas are being abused and mistreated daily, and the worst you have to worry about is abortion. Seriously. The two pale in comparison.
Perhaps we need stick to reality, okay? Put away the time machine.
Just to clarify, you are stating that the war on women in the US is not occurring because women are mistreated in the Middle East. Yes?
No, what you call a "war" is nothing more than propaganda. It is political hyperbole. Drummed up hysteria. You can't possibly believe that there is a war being waged against women here in America, can you? Since when do we stage public beatings and stonings of women in the streets as a matter of punishment or twisted justice? Hmm? Do you see anyone doing such a thing here? No. Because you would be arrested and put away for a long, long time if you did.
So, what "war" are we talking about exactly? The real one in the Middle East, against those poor women.
Just to clarify, you are stating that the war on women in the US is not occurring because women are mistreated in the Middle East. Yes?
No, what you call a "war" is nothing more than propaganda. It is political hyperbole. Drummed up hysteria. You can't possibly believe that there is a war being waged against women here in America, can you? Since when do we stage public beatings and stonings of women in the streets as a matter of punishment or twisted justice? Hmm? Do you see anyone doing such a thing here? No. Because you would be arrested and put away for a long, long time if you did.
So, what "war" are we talking about exactly? The real one in the Middle East, against those poor women.
So your argument, again, seems to be that a woman should be happy being forced to have a baby she doesn't want because, gosh darn it, at least we aren't taking you out in the street and stoning you.
Do you really think this is an intellectually honest argument?
Sorry, guy, there is a misogynistic streak in the GOP. The very thought of women controlling their sexuality frightens you for some reason.
Just to clarify, you are stating that the war on women in the US is not occurring because women are mistreated in the Middle East. Yes?
No, what you call a "war" is nothing more than propaganda. It is political hyperbole. Drummed up hysteria. You can't possibly believe that there is a war being waged against women here in America, can you? Since when do we stage public beatings and stonings of women in the streets as a matter of punishment or twisted justice? Hmm? Do you see anyone doing such a thing here? No. Because you would be arrested and put away for a long, long time if you did.
So, what "war" are we talking about exactly? The real one in the Middle East, against those poor women.
[
Lovely. Imagine this very same woman being castrated as a child, married off to an elderly man to perhaps be sodomized, beaten, stoned, or worse, killed for exercising her own rights. Imagine, that if she wanted to have a baby, these men would beat her until she miscarried. Yes, there are other choices rather than abortion, Joe. You'd prefer murder to a choice, and that's good to know. Par for the course for you.
So, understand one thing, Joe. You're comparing a political party to these people. Is this what you want to go with?
Sorry, you saying so doesn't make it so.
g
but there is a war on women reproductive rights...
Just to clarify, you are stating that the war on women in the US is not occurring because women are mistreated in the Middle East. Yes?
No, what you call a "war" is nothing more than propaganda. It is political hyperbole. Drummed up hysteria. You can't possibly believe that there is a war being waged against women here in America, can you? Since when do we stage public beatings and stonings of women in the streets as a matter of punishment or twisted justice? Hmm? Do you see anyone doing such a thing here? No. Because you would be arrested and put away for a long, long time if you did.
So, what "war" are we talking about exactly? The real one in the Middle East, against those poor women.
No, what is hysteria is arresting and imprisoning women who have a still born child or a miscarriage with a drummed up charge of unproven substance abuse leading to "fetal homicide". Completely ignoring the fact that miscarriages occur most often spontaneously. There are an estimated 250 women in the US that have been imprisoned since 2005. There were 413 cases between 1973 and 2005.
Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973?2005: Implications for Women?s Legal Status and Public Health
The war on women constitutes both legislative and rhetorical attacks that come from the GOP. Not some made up propaganda/comparison that you pulled out of your head.
(a)
(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.
(2)
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the punishment for that separate offense is the same as the punishment provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn childs mother.
(B) An offense under this section does not require proof that
(i) the person engaging in the conduct had knowledge or should have had knowledge that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant; or
(ii) the defendant intended to cause the death of, or bodily injury to, the unborn child.
(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.
Come now. If women really meant that much to you guys, you wouldn't be using them as tools for your sick political "war on women" schtick. Alas, no admissions are forthcoming, just more trolling and name calling. Such is the self defeating nature of liberalism.
Have a good morning!
How odd that they all have the same victimizes, heterosexual men.Women, homosexuals, the "poor", so many different demographics serve the liberal agenda as victims. Shame is, so many appear so incapable of independent thought, they fall into the trap and become useful tools.
I don't think anyone here will defend the kind of outrages presented in that film. A more pertinent question might be if any of the lefties here recognize the abuse inherent in 'feminists' denigrating and demeaning women who choose to be full-time stay at home moms/caregivers/homemakers?
No, what you call a "war" is nothing more than propaganda. It is political hyperbole. Drummed up hysteria. You can't possibly believe that there is a war being waged against women here in America, can you? Since when do we stage public beatings and stonings of women in the streets as a matter of punishment or twisted justice? Hmm? Do you see anyone doing such a thing here? No. Because you would be arrested and put away for a long, long time if you did.
So, what "war" are we talking about exactly? The real one in the Middle East, against those poor women.
No, what is hysteria is arresting and imprisoning women who have a still born child or a miscarriage with a drummed up charge of unproven substance abuse leading to "fetal homicide". Completely ignoring the fact that miscarriages occur most often spontaneously. There are an estimated 250 women in the US that have been imprisoned since 2005. There were 413 cases between 1973 and 2005.
Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973?2005: Implications for Women?s Legal Status and Public Health
The war on women constitutes both legislative and rhetorical attacks that come from the GOP. Not some made up propaganda/comparison that you pulled out of your head.
You must be joking. A study done by a women's advocacy group? You insult my intelligence. But then again, you do realize that Federal law recognizes that a developing child is indeed human, correct? And if that woman is doing something to intentionally harm, or if anyone for that matter is trying to harm the child, they could be held liable for a crime.
Title 18, Chapter 1 (Crimes), §1841 (18 USC 1841)
(a)
(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.
(2)
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the punishment for that separate offense is the same as the punishment provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn childs mother.
(B) An offense under this section does not require proof that
(i) the person engaging in the conduct had knowledge or should have had knowledge that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant; or
(ii) the defendant intended to cause the death of, or bodily injury to, the unborn child.
(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.
And there you have it. Keep that garbage to yourself. "War on women," ha!
No, what is hysteria is arresting and imprisoning women who have a still born child or a miscarriage with a drummed up charge of unproven substance abuse leading to "fetal homicide". Completely ignoring the fact that miscarriages occur most often spontaneously. There are an estimated 250 women in the US that have been imprisoned since 2005. There were 413 cases between 1973 and 2005.
Arrests of and Forced Interventions on Pregnant Women in the United States, 1973?2005: Implications for Women?s Legal Status and Public Health
The war on women constitutes both legislative and rhetorical attacks that come from the GOP. Not some made up propaganda/comparison that you pulled out of your head.
You must be joking. A study done by a women's advocacy group? You insult my intelligence. But then again, you do realize that Federal law recognizes that a developing child is indeed human, correct? And if that woman is doing something to intentionally harm, or if anyone for that matter is trying to harm the child, they could be held liable for a crime.
Title 18, Chapter 1 (Crimes), §1841 (18 USC 1841)
(a)
(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.
(2)
(A) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the punishment for that separate offense is the same as the punishment provided under Federal law for that conduct had that injury or death occurred to the unborn childs mother.
(B) An offense under this section does not require proof that
(i) the person engaging in the conduct had knowledge or should have had knowledge that the victim of the underlying offense was pregnant; or
(ii) the defendant intended to cause the death of, or bodily injury to, the unborn child.
(C) If the person engaging in the conduct thereby intentionally kills or attempts to kill the unborn child, that person shall instead of being punished under subparagraph (A), be punished as provided under sections 1111, 1112, and 1113 of this title for intentionally killing or attempting to kill a human being.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the death penalty shall not be imposed for an offense under this section.
And there you have it. Keep that garbage to yourself. "War on women," ha!
There is a war on women sponsored and legislated by the GOP. It is not my problem that you lack the capacity to grasp this. It is yours. Our conversation has reached the end.
