Refusal To Comply

Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
CDC has been wrong about everything at every turn,...Less credible than the China Nooz Network.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
I call straight-up bullshit to that. Wait..unless it's 4-5 people.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
CDC has been wrong about everything at every turn,...Less credible than the China Nooz Network.
No one can predict anything with 100% certainty. They’ve been far more accurate than you geniuses.
 
They can't arrest everybody.

A network of 3,000 California churches, representing 2.5 million members, plans to defy Gov. Gavin Newsom by resuming in-person services, as pastors insist they've been left out of the process.

California Church United pastors announced Thursday in front of a Fontana megachurch that they plan to open May 31, instead of waiting until stage 3, when gyms, movie theaters, and other venues open, the San Bernardino County Sun reports.


California pastors vow to defy Gov. Newsom and reopen: 'Churches are part of the answer not the problem'
Jesus will protect them
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought

Choir practice, where people stand next to each other and are forcefully expelling air in proximity to each other.

How does that require Churches to be entirely shut down?

Also, lumping confirmed and probable cases together is shaky, and how many of said people actually became sick? How many became seriously ill? How many died?
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

I guess that's their trouble, not yours control freak.
If it was only them who would get infected I wouldn't care but they leave church to go eat out and visit friends and relatives. We also have to suspect the motives of the pastors who are worried about their racket. There's the real control freaks here.
Your just afraid they will defy authority, mass congregate and nothing will happen.

mind your own business.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
CDC has been wrong about everything at every turn,...Less credible than the China Nooz Network.
No one can predict anything with 100% certainty. They’ve been far more accurate than you geniuses.
They've been nearly 100% wrong on everything, fool....I can throw darts and be more right than they have been.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

I guess that's their trouble, not yours control freak.
If it was only them who would get infected I wouldn't care but they leave church to go eat out and visit friends and relatives. We also have to suspect the motives of the pastors who are worried about their racket. There's the real control freaks here.

No, you are just a hater. Mind your own business and you should be fine!
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
I call straight-up bullshit to that. Wait..unless it's 4-5 people.

finalironymeter_zps9935014f.gif
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought

Choir practice, where people stand next to each other and are forcefully expelling air in proximity to each other.

How does that require Churches to be entirely shut down?

Also, lumping confirmed and probable cases together is shaky, and how many of said people actually became sick? How many became seriously ill? How many died?

They counted suspect and confirmed cases and reported them separately. There’s nothing shaky about how they treated the data. To be a suspected case, you had to have symptoms compatible with COVID.

I’m just saying that the spread of COVID is easier than we think. Church attendance is an unnecessary risk.
 
They can't arrest everybody.

A network of 3,000 California churches, representing 2.5 million members, plans to defy Gov. Gavin Newsom by resuming in-person services, as pastors insist they've been left out of the process.

California Church United pastors announced Thursday in front of a Fontana megachurch that they plan to open May 31, instead of waiting until stage 3, when gyms, movie theaters, and other venues open, the San Bernardino County Sun reports.


California pastors vow to defy Gov. Newsom and reopen: 'Churches are part of the answer not the problem'
They can arrest every pastor though.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
I call straight-up bullshit to that. Wait..unless it's 4-5 people.

finalironymeter_zps9935014f.gif

Where’s the irony? I showed a scientific case study of spread of COVID. Y’all replied with disbelief based solely on your unwillingness to want to believe it.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought

Choir practice, where people stand next to each other and are forcefully expelling air in proximity to each other.

How does that require Churches to be entirely shut down?

Also, lumping confirmed and probable cases together is shaky, and how many of said people actually became sick? How many became seriously ill? How many died?

They counted suspect and confirmed cases and reported them separately. There’s nothing shaky about how they treated the data. To be a suspected case, you had to have symptoms compatible with COVID.

I’m just saying that the spread of COVID is easier than we think. Church attendance is an unnecessary risk.

Again, how does Choir practice compare to church attendance, especially if spacing and PPE requirements are followed?
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought
I call straight-up bullshit to that. Wait..unless it's 4-5 people.

finalironymeter_zps9935014f.gif

Where’s the irony? I showed a scientific case study of spread of COVID. Y’all replied with disbelief based solely on your unwillingness to want to believe it.

Your chart comes from one of the most unreliable sources available....Then you post a video about rejecting reality and substituting it with one of your own?!?

That defines irony, Chumlee.
 
They can't arrest everybody.

A network of 3,000 California churches, representing 2.5 million members, plans to defy Gov. Gavin Newsom by resuming in-person services, as pastors insist they've been left out of the process.

California Church United pastors announced Thursday in front of a Fontana megachurch that they plan to open May 31, instead of waiting until stage 3, when gyms, movie theaters, and other venues open, the San Bernardino County Sun reports.


California pastors vow to defy Gov. Newsom and reopen: 'Churches are part of the answer not the problem'
They can arrest every pastor though.

I don't think they'll care.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought

Choir practice, where people stand next to each other and are forcefully expelling air in proximity to each other.

How does that require Churches to be entirely shut down?

Also, lumping confirmed and probable cases together is shaky, and how many of said people actually became sick? How many became seriously ill? How many died?

They counted suspect and confirmed cases and reported them separately. There’s nothing shaky about how they treated the data. To be a suspected case, you had to have symptoms compatible with COVID.

I’m just saying that the spread of COVID is easier than we think. Church attendance is an unnecessary risk.

Again, how does Choir practice compare to church attendance, especially if spacing and PPE requirements are followed?
To hell with all of it....I'll gladly enter a busy bar today.

There is nothing to fear.
 
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.
Yeah right. When was the last time you went to church, asshole. Let me guess, not fucking lately if ever. Now sit down and shut the fuck up and let people practice their freedom of religion as THEY see fit. It's none of your god damn business what they do and it sure as hell isn't Nuisances so butt the fuck out.
 
Last edited:
Churches are the worst for this kind of thing. They can't keep their hands off each other. Everyone has to hug and shake hands and pack in as closely as possible. A nightmare in the making since churches are full of old people.

Methods can be taken to lessen the risk. Limits to people in the church, social distancing of non-family units. Spillover service broadcasts to parking lots with proper spacing. everyone wearing masks/gloves.

The issue is the blanket ban, and the fact of the matter that when it comes to Religion and Free Exercise, the government is required to use the least intrusive method when it comes to limiting said free exercise due to a compelling government interest.
View attachment 335455

Food for thought

Choir practice, where people stand next to each other and are forcefully expelling air in proximity to each other.

How does that require Churches to be entirely shut down?

Also, lumping confirmed and probable cases together is shaky, and how many of said people actually became sick? How many became seriously ill? How many died?

They counted suspect and confirmed cases and reported them separately. There’s nothing shaky about how they treated the data. To be a suspected case, you had to have symptoms compatible with COVID.

I’m just saying that the spread of COVID is easier than we think. Church attendance is an unnecessary risk.

Again, how does Choir practice compare to church attendance, especially if spacing and PPE requirements are followed?
To hell with all of it....I'll gladly enter a busy bar today.

There is nothing to fear.

I might not just yet, but I would enter one that practiced limited entry and spacing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top